Tim,
Brooke brought up a good point. I thought that the ultimate winner was determined by Total Wins, with Total Deviation being the tie-breaker?
So if Mark were to tie for the win, despite his having missed a week, he would probably win the Total Deviation tie-breaker (i.e. having missed a week). So shouldn't the tie-breaker be "Average" deviation, not Total Deviation?
Or would the reasoning be that if Mark could tie for Total Wins, despite having missed a week, then maybe he should get an advantage in the tie-breaker?
See, this is what happens to a person who has a terrible season making picks.
Bill