"July 2-6" http://rtw.ml.cmu.edu/rtw/kbbrowser/date:july_2_6
"1833-38" http://rtw.ml.cmu.edu/rtw/kbbrowser/year:n1833_38
I've been marking those as false. It would be nice if I could say
"you're close, but it's actually a representation of a range", rather
than just saying that NELL's incorrect. Is there anything I can do to
point NELL in the right direction?
Personally, I've been considering ranges to be valid dates on the
assumption that we'll sort and refile them some day when we reconsider how
best to model time ontologically. We're finally getting started on doing
stuff with time this year, but not that far along yet. I think allowing
ranges is also in keeping with allowing things like "sheep" to be an
instance of "animal" or "northern countries of the EU" to be a valid
"country". We're not really doing much with class vs. instance at this
piont.