cmpt-295-sfu

- Grades will be released on Assignment 1 by the end of the day - A log file has been pushed to each

Should be fine On Friday, September 25, 2020 at 7:12:28 PM UTC-7 hsmoo...@gmail.com wrote: SFU ID:

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/cmpt-295-sfu/fqJQevtRVss/uH0iwdhhAwAJ On Friday, September 25, 2020

As the assignment page says. Check if SUCCESS OR FAILED was dumped by scripts in your top repo folder

I found and fixed my bug, and now it's successful. Thank you! 在 2020年9月24日星期四 UTC-7下午10:53:16，

You cannot restart travis in debug mode as you will be blocking others from obtaining badges on their

Yes you can. On Thursday, September 24, 2020 at 7:48:27 PM UTC-7 tan...@gmail.com wrote: SFU ID:

The newest test is done! Sorry to bother you. I need to be more patient next time. Have a great day!

Think about when you can free the tree You only need to follow the rules we have specified in the

As we approach the deadline, I would like to remind everyone that travis-ci is a batch build process

If your localci reports failed or travis reports failure then your assignment is not complete. - In

direct leak is a block which has no pointers to it. An indirect leak is a block which is only pointed

I see thank you. Very strange because my LOG.md also shows that nothing has failed. On Wednesday,

Looking in more details at your code. Part 2 binary tree is not implemented. You need to finished all

You do not have to worry about attempting to insert to locations beyond the end of the arraylist (

Could you please provide some insights on what I might be doing wrong for realloc and memmove? I have

I believe this is expected. If you do valgrind --leak-check=yes ./tree.bin it will show the problem

I assume you only ran the command ./arraylist.bin? Try ./arraylist.bin --verbose instead. On Tuesday,

Values should be moved forward by 1 (behind the just inserted value). Example: Original array {1,2, 3

Unless it signals an error, your code is ok. The compiler just gives you extra information through

Thanks, I got it. On Tuesday, September 22, 2020 at 9:52:42 am UTC-7 b.minh96 wrote: The number of

either you have a bug. Or you have not completed the assignment. On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 10:

C99 supports declaration of i within for-loop and gcc supports C99. Another compiler may complain;

You only need to modify: void arraylist_free(arraylist *a) Any leaks arising out of arraylist.c is

I meant in the tree and array code; if there is a leak in acutest that's fine On Friday,

Short answer: should be ok. Please read "Assignment 2 Freeing Tree Memory" message thread

Seems Ok! FYI; make sure you comment out your own printfs. For this assignment you passed travis, but

You need to run "make" to generate the bin file. On Monday, September 14, 2020 at 1:11:24

#include "tree.h" is a path-based inclusion ie, it is trying to look for tree.h in ./ #

Thank you. I checked valgrind and saw that I had no memory leaks, but it turns out I should've