It would be helpful to read this first
http://groups.google.com/group/clubmusicians/browse_thread/thread/b30fd6ec2a2e703d?hl=en
So you see where I am coming from with the following;
Why a tiered minimum pay? So everyone can play and be part of the
union.
Lets say Pros want a $200 minimum pay (obviously you who can sell out
will get much more) But Hobbyists just want to play, and the "trying
to make it" crowd want "exposure" and a few bucks. This is considered
by the Pros to be why the union isn't working for them. No?
What if the clubs were to agree to the following?
"A" level clubs agree to a minimum pay of $200 (TBD) per musician
(plus the 10% leader fee) other compensation to be negotiable by the
band. Like 10% of the drink profit or head count, or whatever.
Details.
"B" level clubs pay a $100 minimum (plus the above options)
"C" level clubs Pay a $50 minimum (etc)
"D" level clubs don't promise to pay, just like they do now......and union
people DON'T play there.
So now there is room for everyone. There is a sensible goal for the
musicians to get them selves moved up in the clubs while not hurting
the pay scale for those that have the experience and headliner
(headcount) clout to get into the club tiers above them.
Obviously the scale has to shift for what type of establishment, IE
club, Restaurant etc, but the theory stays the same.
So why would the clubs not just be "D" clubs? What is their motivation
to be "A" clubs?
Well if we create an environment, and movement, away from that by
opening up the possibility to make a few bucks to those that rise to
the occasion, the wheat will separate from the chaff. A movement means
that there is an awareness that bands do not want to play at "D" level
clubs, and that being a "D" level club is an embarrassing place to be
as only the worst of (or newest) bands play there. Club goers cant
expect much at a "D" club and they know it.
How to create a movement? Well if one new Hobbyist joins the union
under these premises, (Right here guys) and even one club can be sold
on this (can be done even with out this) then there is a movement. You
sustain it with the press.
I am convinced that there are writers at our hip local rags that will
totally support ANY idea that makes the scene better. The union can be
represented that it has changed its structure to be better for
everyone (including the clubs) and there is a big movement in that
direction. If the media say its so, it is so. More media follows.
After that, rallies, union events, etc carry it forward. More bands
and groups join, I mean why not if you play once a Quarter at "C"
clubs, you break even on it.
Selling it to the clubs has to happen at the same time. We need to
have reasons it benefits them. Real world numbers. Not easy for sure
but, if we are prepared we can do it. It will take research. We need
to find out what the objections to the plan is before they do. Talking
to them BEFORE asking them to rank themselves would be wise. Go to
them totally ready to SELL it to them.
If they refuse. The answer is simply OK, let us know when you change
your mind. We will be back soon. By the way, we will publicly be
listing you on our "D" list.
Eventually they won't have a choice. But you have to get the musicians
joining the union, or even just supporting it to have any "weight"
added to the argument.
If you think this idea has no merit I would think it better to start a
new thread with your idea instead of putting it here. If you have
suggestions on what would help THIS idea, post away. If you see holes
in this argument and want to see if we can figure them out. Post that
here. If you think it justs sucks, ignore it..........it will go away on its
own.
Ideas on what will make this beneficial (sell-able) to the Hobbyists
and the clubs would be MOST helpful.