This is very interesting, I'll be in DC next week including meeting with various federal CIO's and presenting at the cloud-counsel's Quarterly meeting. Will you be there?ruv--
On Monday, March 12, 2012 12:45:52 PM UTC-4, Craig Lee wrote:Ruv, et al.,Imho, a revitatlized CCIF could help tremendously in NIST's "Priority
Action Plans" (PAPs) to promote cloud standards!The first volume of NIST's Cloud Computing Technology Roadmap released
last November
(http://www.nist.gov/itl/cloud/upload/SP_500_293_volumeI-2.pdf)
identified ten "High Priority Requirements", such as metrics, security,
SLAs, federation management, etc., along with "recommended" PAPs for
each requirement.NIST can't "pick winners in the marketplace" so these PAPs are their
mechanism to facilitate the market to do so. While NIST has some
high-level recommendations, they are actually looking towards the
marketplace to define the specifics in a set of working groups:
http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-cloud-computing/bin/view/CloudComputing/WebHomeIf CCIF was "boss of the world" wrt cloud interop, what would it do?
--Craig
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum (CCIF)" group.
To post to this group, send email to cloud...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cloudforum+...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cloudforum?hl=en
-----
Join our Twitter Group at www.twitter.com/cloudforum
Or Our Linkedin Group at http://ruv.net/a/1eo
=====================================================