1.1 has not been posted on www.simplecloud.info

[CJ Lofstedt]

FYI,  http://www.simplecloud.info/ still points to the 1.0 specs.

Thanks,

C-J

[Leif Johansson]

It should also clearly point to the ietf wg page for continued work.

[Trey Drake]

Yup.  Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the Heroku hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?

The latest revs are linked below.  Note that the below links reflect a few changes post-1.1, namely, addition of required, RFC boiler plate tags (copyright, standard track, etc).  

API

http://code.google.com/p/scim/source/browse/trunk/specs/draft-scim-api-01.xml

Schema

http://code.google.com/p/scim/source/browse/trunk/specs/draft-scim-core-schema-01.xml

Thanks,

Trey

[Chuck Mortimore]

On Jul 31, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Trey Drake wrote:

Yup.  Samuel/Chuck - when will we be able to flip the switch on the Heroku hosted website (which presumably link to the latest spec revs)?

I'm ready if Samuel is.

-cmort

[Samuel Erdtman]

Sorry for the delay, I have been on vacation for the last weeks, but
now I´m back and will do the last polish (e.g. link to the ietf
drafts) on the page and then deployment.

//Samuel

[Samuel Erdtman]

Now http://www.simplecloud.info/ is updated with the new webpage.

Feel free to comment on it. Send the comments to me or Erik and we
will update the page.

If you have a SCIM server you can try the Compliance Test feature, It
still has some limitation but send comments to us and we will try to
improve it.

Thank you Chuck for fixing the Heroku instance.

Cheers
//Samuel

[Morteza Ansari (moransar)]

Looks awesome! Thanks for getting this done.


Cheers,
Morteza

[Chuck Mortimore]

Thanks Samuel - great work

- cmort

[Darran Rolls (SailPoint)]

Nice! Super clean layout - are you available for general web design :-)

--
Darran

[Samuel Erdtman]

Thanks a lot!

However I should not take all the credit, Erik and Daniel has helped a
lot and we have been using Bootstrap from Twitter
(http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap/) for most components.

Cheers
//Samuel

[Trey Drake]

Thanks Samuel - looks fantastic. Gotta love Bootstrap.

Thanks,
Trey

[Christian Metz]

While the site itself is - more or less - a prettified link to the specifications I personally found the Compliance Test to be very helpful.

I really would love to see more work done for this tool.
Especially I would like be informed in more detail what was tested and maybe an example of why a test fails. This might be helpful when I hit another failed test for an "Unkown Test".

Till then
Christian

[Erik Wahlström]

If you hover the failed link you get feedback on what was wrong. You can also view the wire-logs. 

But yes, it still needs more work  :)

By the way, source can be found here (at the moment): 

http://code.google.com/p/scimproxy/source/browse/#svn%2Ftrunk%2Fscimcompliance

/ Erik

[jevge...@gmail.com]

Hi Samuel,

I have a SCIM server running at https://ee.dy.fi

Whenever I try to run Compliance Test it fails already on the web server without even reaching the application.

You can hit https://ee.dy.fi/v1/ServiceProviderConfigs with any browser.

Any clue?

Thanks,

Eugene

[Erik Wahlström]

Hi,

We just made a small change to the simplecloud complence test. It now accepts self signed certificates. Try again.

Cheers

Erik & Samuel

[jevge...@gmail.com]

Hello,

Thanks for the quick fix and response!

Now it fails on "Unknown Test" with:

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class info.simplecloud.core.User

BR,

Eugene