"
"I think the customer can expect only that laws will remain within the
constitutional (or doctrinal) bounds of their particular government,
and that government retains the right to create law as it deems
necessary within those parameters."
This seems wildly naïve. The
current regime in the US has systematically circumvented, superseded,
and otherwise navigated around core constitutional rights.
The
recent debacle surrounding Warrantless Wiretaps alone should give
pause. And while "Freedom of Privacy" is not a guaranteed
constitutional right, it was a nearly as strong legal precedent.
It
doesn't take a wild frothing dissident to be uncomfortable with the
sticking power of any "constitutional (or doctrinal) bounds" as they
apply to any cloud server located on US soil.
Has anyone seen my Habeas Corpus? I swear I just had it."