Azure costs discrepancies between CCF and Azure Diagnostic Costs
54 views
Skip to first unread message
Julien Le Cerf
unread,
Jan 12, 2024, 10:44:56 AMJan 12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Cloud Carbon Footprint
Hi everyone,
We started using Cloud Carbon Footprint to measure our emissions linked to cloud activities on Azure and very satisfied with the results. However we are seing some differences between the cost indicator given by CCF and the one that we get using the Azure Diagnostic costs tool.
In particular, we are seing quite a huge gap with costs linked to Virtual Machines and Storage. Did any of you already faced this issue and would have some explanation on this behavior ?
Cloud Carbon Footprint
unread,
Mar 28, 2024, 2:05:38 PMMar 28
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Cloud Carbon Footprint
Hi Julien,
Thanks for bringing this up! Would you be able to provide any figures for the discrepancies! We do have former conversations here in google groups and also github issues addressing some of these discrepancies that you could refer to that may help as well!