Re: reactive programming for UIs and other use cases

[David Nolen]

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:23 AM, eric <er...@mailup.net> wrote:
> Now, reactive programming isn't necessarily central to the development of
> Clojure core or contrib so readers here might be interested, too. Posting in
> "Clojure Dev" is handled rather restrictively so if you can't post there,
> why not post to this thread here.

Thanks for bringing it up here!

I do think having something in contrib is important. ClojureScript
users consistently ask for better ways to do deal with UI & async
events.

David

[Maik Schünemann]

I don't know how much this goes in frp, but couldn't be the bind functionality in seesaw a good starting point.
It seems as a good abstraction for dataflow programming (in the ui world)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

[Yann Schwartz]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:38 PM, David Nolen <dnolen...@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm in no way a clojurescript specialist, but how hard would it be to wire RxJs (the javascript version of the impressive Reactive Extensions framework) to clojurescript? 

[David Nolen]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Yann Schwartz <abolib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm in no way a clojurescript specialist, but how hard would it be to wire
> RxJs (the javascript version of the impressive Reactive Extensions
> framework) to clojurescript?

Using it probably wouldn't be much work. It's not clear to me that it
supports Google Closure advanced compilation well though.

One tension is that we already have a sequence api. Perhaps it's
unavoidable to duplicate it.

David