On May 31, 2012, at 9:14 AM, michaelr524 <
micha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why the following triggers infinite realization of the infinite lazy
> seq
You've catted together an infinite seq of empty seqs, and forcing a lazy seq doesn't stop until either an element or known emptiness is found, whereas you provide neither. Consider: should the following terminate?
(doall (filter #(< % 42) (range)))
> and how I can work around it and make it stop when f1 returns an
> empty seq,
You need a sentinel so you can use take-while, or another code path in f2 that provides the aforementioned termination condition.
--
Stephen Compall
Greetings from sunny Appleton!