Where did you find the proposal? I can't find any info about let->
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
The primary point of let-> is that you can insert it into an existing -> pipeline.
A) let-> becomes as->
B) test-> becomes cond->
C) when-> becomes some->
and in doing so, tests for non-nil rather than truth.
--
> Given that some-> threads while non-nil but the fn some stops with the first logical true value, this seems counter-intuitive to me. when-> seems better here, or while-> perhaps? What other names were considered?when and while also use logical truth. We don't have anything where the basis is non-nil. Thus my extended description of how some* could come to occupy that role.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
It'd be better, when coming up with great ideas, if you didn't reply to 15-month-old threads as if they were recent! It makes for very confusing reading in most mail clients. Better to start a new thread, if you feel like the discussion is still relevant.
- Korny
--