You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CLIPSESG
Hi everybody,
I'm a student in computer engineering. I’m working on a project where
I have to use an inference engine. I have read a lot of things about
CLIPS and prolog and I have to choose one of them.
I would be very grateful if you could give me a comparison between
them (kind of: CLIPS vs Prolog)
Note : I am using Python and I might use fuzzy logic
CLIPS Support
unread,
Dec 24, 2008, 11:17:13 PM12/24/08
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CLIPSESG
Here's a thread discussing Prolog and Jess (which has forward chaining
features similar to CLIPS):
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CLIPSESG
Thanks but... it’s not really what I want.
I know how CLIPS and Prolog work. I just have to choose between them.
But to do this I need to know more than just the syntax and how they
do inference (forward or backward chaining).
I'd like to get a kind of comparison in terms of efficiency between
CLIPS and Prolog. Or at least for what kind of applications CLIPS is
more suitable than Prolog?
Peter Lin
unread,
Jan 9, 2009, 11:25:04 PM1/9/09
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CLIPSESG
prolog uses classic backward chaining.
jess is forward chaining. the backward chaining in jess uses
subgoaling technique, so it's not full opportunistic backward
chaining.