To the chairman of the IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Dear Dr Pachauri,
I argued, in an open letter to you in March 2009 [1], that the only way
to save the Arctic sea ice is through geoengineering to cool the
Arctic. CO2 reduction can reduce heating but it cannot have a cooling
action. Could we be reaching the point of no return with the sea ice?
In April 2007, the IPCC forecast that the Arctic sea ice would remain
beyond the end of this century. The whole Copenhagen process, in
focussing almost entirely on emissions reductions, has laboured under a
tacit assumption that no tipping points would be reached this century.
The disappearance of the sea ice would be a tipping point, and possibly
a point of no return, even with the most drastic geoengineering to try
to cool the Arctic. And the unabated warming of the Arctic, when the
sea ice is gone, would inevitably lead to both massive methane
discharge and Greenland ice sheet disintegration. This would be
catastrophic for all humanity.
But in September 2007 there was an unexpected and dramatic retreat to
around 3 million square kilometres [2]. This represented an anomaly of
about 2.5 million square kilometres [3]. There following some alarming
projections, later that year, of possible disappearance by 2013 or
earlier [4].
In past two months, the anomaly has increase from 0 to 1 million square
kilometres. If this continues at the same rate for another 4 months,
through the rest of the Arctic summer, the sea ice will practically
disappear.
Furthermore, much of the land mass normally covered with snow at this
time of year (e.g. in Siberia) is bare, reducing the albedo and
increasing absorption of solar energy.
The current warming may not continue throughout the summer, but the
disregard of the Arctic warming by the IPCC and scientific advisers to
the Copenhagen meeting, is inexcusable.
WE HAVE AN EMERGENCY
The meeting of two UNFCCC working groups (twelfth session of the AWG-KP
and tenth session of the AWG-LCA [5]) in Bonn, 1st to 11th June,
represents an opportunity for a "declaration of emergency", to which
the geoengineering community must respond with proposals. Governments
must respond with the necessary funding and logistics for
implementation of one or more proposals.
John Nissen,
Chiswick, London, UK
[1]
http://geo-engineering.blogspot.com/2009/03/open-letter-to-dr-pachauri.html
[2]
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.area.arctic.png
[3]
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.anomaly.arctic.png
[4]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7139797.stm
[5]
http://unfccc.int/2860.php
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Climate Intervention" group.
.
.