>> I was under the impression that logo 1 was the "winner" of that
>> collection, am I wrong?
>> We can certainly add those to the vote.
>>
>
> There wasn't a winner chosen. I like B, H, I, and J from that image.
Oh, sorry for my misunderstanding then.
> What's the best method for choosing a winner? Obviously whoever goes to the
> trouble to make a GUI will have the freedom to use whatever icon he or she
> wants, and also could ship under a completely different name than
> "clearskies".
In my view, other apps will implement the CS protocol. The benefit of
having a recognizable logo will be that it can then be displayed
within the app, either in the protocol choice UI (for multi-protocol
apps), or in the about screen.
The official app would have a logo which is either the CS logo, or a
variation thereof.
> I kind of like the "sketched" look for that purpose, since it makes it feel
> conceptual. However, for other places where an icon is used, it'd make
> sense to polish it off.
I see. Personally I'd prefer a polished icon (gives an immediate
impression of quality), understand your point.
> Instead of picking one logo, we could go with "yellow sun, with arrows", and
> leave individual sub-projects to build on that idea as suits their needs.
> With Clearskies, we're definitely using a "bazaar" process, meaning there's
> no central command-and-control, so it'd be hard to try and force centralized
> branding anyway.
This is true, but not unheard of. Popular examples are Linux and git
(
http://git-scm.com/images/lo...@2x.png).
It's clear that anyone can use a different icon, and there's no way we
would enforce otherwise (and why would we want that anyway?), but it's
in fact a benefit to the implementer to be able to easily show that
they're CS-compatible.
> We could set a deadline for votes, say a week out, and then everyone could
> vote for the logos they like. Everyone would be allowed to vote for more
> than one logo- i.e. you're voting for the logos you find acceptable. We
> could then total all the votes and whichever has the most can be the winner.
I agree with this.
In that case, how would we do the voting? It just dawned on me that
running the vote through the mailing list is going to be difficult.
I'm pretty sure there must be a better way of doing it. Doodle maybe?