Why BBC's Panorama got it wrong on Green Energy

[Nick Balmer]

Hello,

Isn't a good thing that the establishment and energy lobby doesn't have a monopoly on the issuing of information these days

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28jjWyaeNUI&feature=youtu.be&mid=539

Nick Balmer

[dave andrews]

--
Dave Andrews
K.E.N.T.
+ 44 (0) 755 265 9166
+ 31 (0) 631 926 885
+ 44 (0) 1225 837978

[Herbert Eppel]

See also
<http://groups.google.com/group/energy-discussion-group/browse_thread/thread/5a8c269b04c5cca6?hl=en-GB>

Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk

> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28jjWyaeNUI&feature=youtu.be&mid=539>
>
> Nick Balmer

[Neil Crumpton]

Hi,

This is a few minutes worth watching. I wonder if the BBC board will be big enough to realise that they have not been providing a public service in recent times on the issue of energy (eg Panorama, Bang). They should show this video by way of apology for the Panorama programme (much like apologies in newspapers - when they do actually occur) and do a proper programme on Fukushima.

I will email the Action for Renewables link to some BBC people I know - and some ITV ones too.

Neil

PS Question Time yesterday evening with Chris Huhne on the panel had a interesting clash on the solar FiTs. I reckon Huhne took a hit on the speed of FiT cuts, if not the scale. David Dimbleby asked what PV stood for and settled for solar panels. He also mentioned that QT was an opinion, rather than factual, programme. Progress indeed.... but no harm in bringing in a few facts and leaving out the regular corrosive commentators (with potentially non-transparent or private agendas).