For CQM to explain the structure of heavy nuclei, an aether made of touching orbitspheres filling all of space may be in order.
40 views
Skip to first unread message
kmarinas86
Jun 26, 2012, 12:53:56 PM6/26/12
to classica...@googlegroups.com
As John Barchak has said, "It is absolutely amazing that most real physics (non-QM) is geometric."
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/classical-physics/4uePGas1xhY/discussion
Another recent poster, who mentions the possibility of vortex behavior inside the orbitsphere, alluded to the problem of finding what is inside the orbitsphere:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/classical-physics/75M0AtqaBfQ/discussion
I've been curious about what happens during transitions where orbitspheres cross each other.
I wondered, "Well, how would that work?"
Some of you still visiting this page might vaguely remember about my position on Joseph Newman's concept of gyroscopic particles.
Personally, I'm curious about geometrical mystery surrounding the nature of, well, nature.
Now before I go any further, let me show you a few pictures:
The following is a 3D version of an Apollonian Gasket, known as the Apollonian sphere:
Could it be possible that an orbitsphere could actually be a clusterball of orbitspheres?
Could the orbitspheres have current-density distributions that cause the orbitspheres to "stick" together?
http://klein.math.okstate.edu/IndrasPearls/DoubleCuspGroup/DoubleCuspGroup/
The following is an example of circles being used to fill in a circle. Note the patterns that somewhat resemble the exterior product of an electric field with a magnetic field around anti-parallel conductors and also somewhat the dipolar field of electric charges.
In this example, you could, in your mind, hop from one circle to another circle, one adjacent circle at a time, and no matter what crooked path taken, the number hops between the first and last circle is always either odd or even. This means that if you were to rotate one circle in this cluster CW, as if it were a gear, all the gears that are an even number of hops away would also begin to rotate CW, while all those rotating CCW would be an odd number of hops away. If you made a system of gears just like this. They would not fight each other. They could all be rotated as a unison.
There is also an implication as to what direction the energies would transfer:
This allows for there to be a sensible mechanism for large-to-small-to-large energy transfer, in addition to providing a basis as to how these "orbitspheres" would translate positions with respect to one another.
High-quality PDF below:
http://www.math.okstate.edu/~wrightd/Works/MyScans/Notices.pdf
Below is a "marbles" version of a similar pattern:
Try the ball "hopping" experiment, and see if you can find the similarity.
Now, let's realize the significance of this.
You could have countless orbitspheres "kissing" at the surface where the currents go in the same direction.
Each orbitsphere acts as a resonant cavity, at different frequencies depending size and other factors.
The possibilities are not limited to spheres. They can also applies to bars, such as in the following picture:
If the current travels at the boundary of the circles, bearing CW or CCW, from circle to circle, it would seem that the progress averaged along the overall path of a straight chain of circles would be pi/2 times slower than as measured along the full length around the circles (pi/2 being half the circumference, when 1 is the diameter).
However, consider the paths consisting of the top and bottom "staight-edge" boundaries in the above picture.
It turns out that all the circles that touch the same boundaries (either top or bottom) are an even number of hops away. This means that if you rotated all these circles, as if they were gears, then all the circles touching the bottom boundary would move the bottom area together in the same direction. Ditto for the top boundary. However, the bottom and the top boundaries would actually be pulled in opposite directions, as circles touching opposite boundaries are an odd number of steps away.
So, if we could imagine a situation where two seemingly touching circles must rotate together (sharing the same spin orientation), they could in fact do so if they were separated by a bar like this one, however thin such a bar were (even perhaps as thin as the Schwarzschild radius of a much larger orbitsphere that it is a part of). In fact, it would appear that such bars must exist between the circles touching the two edges of the above bar (i.e. the top and bottom boundaries mentioned previously). This relationship would appear to be infinitely recursive if all the space in the bar were to be filled with circles. In a sense, we have could have "bars within bars".
It would be clear that any speed of energy transfer from "border-to-border" would be reduced by a factor of pi/2 averaged over the length of the chain, assuming a straight chain. However, given that these chains are not straight, the border-to-border energy transfer would propagate significantly slower. One could imagine that properties such as material permittivity, refractive index, resistivity, and emissivity, all of which are frequency and/or wavelength dependent, might only be explained at a fundamental level if understanding about them is obtained from some geometric pattern embodying the properties themselves. Otherwise, they may remain as solely empirically-determined properties that evade an accurate classical, first-principles explanation.
Given the arrangement of the circles, it would also be possible to stack these "bars" layer by layer, while still allowing all the circles to rotate in "unison", in the sense I mentioned above. To the extent that such layers do not line up, the extent to which such layers may have difference in "bar curvature" to make up for the offset. The result would be an alternating pattern of "left"-oriented and "right"-oriented motions with a variable overall orientation. Thus, any energy moving across layers, particularly along paths such as those "vertical" chains highlighted in red, would have a characteristic alternation about them, perhaps identifiable as a TEM wave, or transverse electromagnetic mode wave, with the ability to have interactions with surrounding media.
A connection can be made here with the alleged "longitudinal [aether] waves" that some, such as Konstantin Meyl (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7SR4vF_pug) and Eric Dollard (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GObB67ETvRQ) have supposed as being capable of traveling at pi/2 times the speed of light (https://www.google.com/search?q="pi%2F2+times+the+speed+of+light"). [This notion in fact became a catalyst for my development of a geometrical hypothesis that longitudinal waves might travel in spherical surfaces, which I later compared to Mills' orbitsphere concept.] If we were to take the above image as a guide, then the likely place that such "longitudinal waves" would travel along would be the relatively straight path at the top and bottom boundaries, in opposite directions, perpendicular to what maybe analogous to a TEM wave (the red "vertical" chains).
Beyond this point, there is too much to speculate at this time. The patterns remain very interesting and suggestive, however.
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/classical-physics/4uePGas1xhY/discussion
Another recent poster, who mentions the possibility of vortex behavior inside the orbitsphere, alluded to the problem of finding what is inside the orbitsphere:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/classical-physics/75M0AtqaBfQ/discussion
I've been curious about what happens during transitions where orbitspheres cross each other.
I wondered, "Well, how would that work?"
Some of you still visiting this page might vaguely remember about my position on Joseph Newman's concept of gyroscopic particles.
Personally, I'm curious about geometrical mystery surrounding the nature of, well, nature.
Now before I go any further, let me show you a few pictures:
The following is a 3D version of an Apollonian Gasket, known as the Apollonian sphere:
Could it be possible that an orbitsphere could actually be a clusterball of orbitspheres?
Could the orbitspheres have current-density distributions that cause the orbitspheres to "stick" together?
http://klein.math.okstate.edu/IndrasPearls/DoubleCuspGroup/DoubleCuspGroup/
The following is an example of circles being used to fill in a circle. Note the patterns that somewhat resemble the exterior product of an electric field with a magnetic field around anti-parallel conductors and also somewhat the dipolar field of electric charges.
In this example, you could, in your mind, hop from one circle to another circle, one adjacent circle at a time, and no matter what crooked path taken, the number hops between the first and last circle is always either odd or even. This means that if you were to rotate one circle in this cluster CW, as if it were a gear, all the gears that are an even number of hops away would also begin to rotate CW, while all those rotating CCW would be an odd number of hops away. If you made a system of gears just like this. They would not fight each other. They could all be rotated as a unison.
There is also an implication as to what direction the energies would transfer:
This allows for there to be a sensible mechanism for large-to-small-to-large energy transfer, in addition to providing a basis as to how these "orbitspheres" would translate positions with respect to one another.
High-quality PDF below:
http://www.math.okstate.edu/~wrightd/Works/MyScans/Notices.pdf
Below is a "marbles" version of a similar pattern:
Try the ball "hopping" experiment, and see if you can find the similarity.
Now, let's realize the significance of this.
You could have countless orbitspheres "kissing" at the surface where the currents go in the same direction.
Each orbitsphere acts as a resonant cavity, at different frequencies depending size and other factors.
The possibilities are not limited to spheres. They can also applies to bars, such as in the following picture:
If the current travels at the boundary of the circles, bearing CW or CCW, from circle to circle, it would seem that the progress averaged along the overall path of a straight chain of circles would be pi/2 times slower than as measured along the full length around the circles (pi/2 being half the circumference, when 1 is the diameter).
However, consider the paths consisting of the top and bottom "staight-edge" boundaries in the above picture.
It turns out that all the circles that touch the same boundaries (either top or bottom) are an even number of hops away. This means that if you rotated all these circles, as if they were gears, then all the circles touching the bottom boundary would move the bottom area together in the same direction. Ditto for the top boundary. However, the bottom and the top boundaries would actually be pulled in opposite directions, as circles touching opposite boundaries are an odd number of steps away.
So, if we could imagine a situation where two seemingly touching circles must rotate together (sharing the same spin orientation), they could in fact do so if they were separated by a bar like this one, however thin such a bar were (even perhaps as thin as the Schwarzschild radius of a much larger orbitsphere that it is a part of). In fact, it would appear that such bars must exist between the circles touching the two edges of the above bar (i.e. the top and bottom boundaries mentioned previously). This relationship would appear to be infinitely recursive if all the space in the bar were to be filled with circles. In a sense, we have could have "bars within bars".
It would be clear that any speed of energy transfer from "border-to-border" would be reduced by a factor of pi/2 averaged over the length of the chain, assuming a straight chain. However, given that these chains are not straight, the border-to-border energy transfer would propagate significantly slower. One could imagine that properties such as material permittivity, refractive index, resistivity, and emissivity, all of which are frequency and/or wavelength dependent, might only be explained at a fundamental level if understanding about them is obtained from some geometric pattern embodying the properties themselves. Otherwise, they may remain as solely empirically-determined properties that evade an accurate classical, first-principles explanation.
Given the arrangement of the circles, it would also be possible to stack these "bars" layer by layer, while still allowing all the circles to rotate in "unison", in the sense I mentioned above. To the extent that such layers do not line up, the extent to which such layers may have difference in "bar curvature" to make up for the offset. The result would be an alternating pattern of "left"-oriented and "right"-oriented motions with a variable overall orientation. Thus, any energy moving across layers, particularly along paths such as those "vertical" chains highlighted in red, would have a characteristic alternation about them, perhaps identifiable as a TEM wave, or transverse electromagnetic mode wave, with the ability to have interactions with surrounding media.
A connection can be made here with the alleged "longitudinal [aether] waves" that some, such as Konstantin Meyl (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7SR4vF_pug) and Eric Dollard (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GObB67ETvRQ) have supposed as being capable of traveling at pi/2 times the speed of light (https://www.google.com/search?q="pi%2F2+times+the+speed+of+light"). [This notion in fact became a catalyst for my development of a geometrical hypothesis that longitudinal waves might travel in spherical surfaces, which I later compared to Mills' orbitsphere concept.] If we were to take the above image as a guide, then the likely place that such "longitudinal waves" would travel along would be the relatively straight path at the top and bottom boundaries, in opposite directions, perpendicular to what maybe analogous to a TEM wave (the red "vertical" chains).
Beyond this point, there is too much to speculate at this time. The patterns remain very interesting and suggestive, however.
Message has been deleted
kmarinas86
Jul 29, 2012, 3:58:08 PM7/29/12
to classica...@googlegroups.com
I looked more carefully at some of the pictures in the previous post.
___________
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:53:56 AM UTC-5, kmarinas86 wrote:
___________
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:53:56 AM UTC-5, kmarinas86 wrote:
In this example, you could, in your mind, hop from one circle to another circle, one adjacent circle at a time, and no matter what crooked path taken, the number hops between the first and last circle is always either odd or even. This means that if you were to rotate one circle in this cluster CW, as if it were a gear, all the gears that are an even number of hops away would also begin to rotate CW, while all those rotating CCW would be an odd number of hops away. If you made a system of gears just like this. They would not fight each other. They could all be rotated as a unison.
[....]
Below is a "marbles" version of a similar pattern:
Try the ball "hopping" experiment, and see if you can find the similarity.
Kmarinas86's self-correction:
It turns out that the above pictures are not proper examples of what I was trying to describe.
The pattern on the top-left of the graphic below is a good example of what I'm talking about.
It's the one that says "(i) 1/10 cusp:" right below it.
Generally, if the numerator of the cusp fraction is odd and the denominator of the cusp fraction is even, then all the possible paths from any one circle to any other one circle has "circle lengths" which are all either even or odd, meaning that if one imagines turning one circle, as if it were a gear, then all circles would cooperate:
- For every two circles separated by an even number of hops, no matter which path, will be made to rotate in the same direction.
- For every two circles separated by an odd number of hops, no matter which path, will be made to rotate in opposite directions.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages