On May 18, 2015, at 10:06 AM,
laus...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for the instant replies!
>
> понедельник, 18 мая 2015 г., 19:17:49 UTC+3 пользователь Josh написал:
>
>> Mac applications, or MacRelix command-line tools?
>
> Just Mac applications. Primitive self-written CLI utilities to start with
> :-)
Are you thinking of some other CLI system than MacRelix, or are we not understanding each other?
>> Do you mean CW Pro 7, or just 7?
>
> Sorry for inaccuracy, I've meant CW Pro 7.
The good news is that it's not too old. The not-so-good news is that it's an untested configuration.
>> Right now, the only officially supported build environment is CodeWarrior
>> Pro 6.
>
> Luckily it's not a big deal as for me (hope not only just for me).
It should be possible to make it work.
>> At the moment, setting up the build environment is complex and difficult.
>
> It would be great if you could write at least briefly on how to setup CW
> for MacRelix in public or private letter. Also CC'ing my mentioned friend,
> as he's interested to tinker with compiling in MacRelix as well.
I'm not sure how to describe the process, as I haven't done a proper installation in years. But I can start by documenting the required end result.
>> I'd like to make it more automated, but it's tricky because e.g. you
>> can't download MPW anymore, so where should it even start?
>
> <piracy>Ahem, at least full CW Pro 6 is on a known abandonware
> attic</piracy>.
s/piracy/bootlegging/
> Not sure of Pro 6, but it looks like Pro 7 includes a
> somewhat complete MPW on a Reference CD.
As does Pro 6. I think my own setup uses Apple's distribution, though.
What version is your Universal Interfaces? That's probably the only thing that really matters.
> Maybe it's possible to ask Apple to re-host MPW once again.
It is certainly possible to shout the question into the void. Getting someone at Apple to hear it, much less a non-null response, is another matter.
> A free compiler
> toolchain is another question, esp. capable of producing PPC binaries...
That would be nice. It's not something I'm pursuing personally at the moment, but I'd be interested in third-party efforts. :-)
>> That said, if you're willing to be the user/tester, we can certainly
>> improve things.
>
> We would like to try :-)
Be prepared for a bumpy ride. But at least it's paved, unlike Pro 5. :-P
> P.S.: Sorry for the dumb qustion, but is it possible to get tab completion
> in MacRelix shell?
Again, it's complicated. Continue in a new thread, maybe?
Josh