Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: FW: Ramp widths along Colfax BRT Project
Bryan Wilson
I've done some more digging on this issue, which I think needs to be addressed...
Generally, here's what I think all of this boils down to in no particular order of importance...
- Every raised curb along sidewalks needs to be removed to allow water to flow through the ROW freely. They should all look like the one currently being installed at Colfax & Steele, or at Colfax & Park Ave next to Scooter Liquors.
Please address these going forward & correct the issues that have been installed.
Respectfully,
Bryan Wilson
Dear Bryan,
Thank you for your interest in the East Colfax BRT project.
Final design of the project concluded in 2024, and construction is currently underway. The time for public input on design has ended, and the project is not accepting altered design suggestions. Additional information related to your concerns is outlined below. To review the final designs in full, please visit the project website.
DOTI adheres to PROWAG (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines), which dictates the alteration of facilities within the public right-of-way to maintain accessibility for use (pedestrian push buttons for crossing) and accessible circulation. The minimum widths for sidewalks can be found here. The regulation states “sidewalks constructed adjoining existing curbs shall be a minimum of five (5) feet wide measured from the back of the curb head, with expansion joint between sidewalk and curb, unless otherwise specified by the Engineer.”
All project installations meet all PROWAG requirements and conflict clearances. The project design has been diligently reviewed and approved by the FTA and meets all ADA requirements. New light pole and equipment installations have been specifically placed to meet all design standards and requirements while also avoiding underground utility conflicts. The above ground installations you have identified through emails and social media have been installed correctly and legally with a multitude of review processes and will not be altered.
At the corner of Williams Street and Colfax Ave, there will be trees installed. You can view the final design in more detail here.
The project worked closely with DOTI’s bike planners to incorporate several bikeway connections across Colfax as part of the BRT project. Reach out to the city’s bike team to discuss your concerns about bikeway plans and connections with the Denver Bike Team at bi...@denvergov.org. You can also share specific Denver Moves: Bikes project feedback by emailing denve...@denvergov.org or calling (720) 865-9378.
Unfortunately, we are unable to add Google groups to our mailing list due to limitations with our mass mailing software. We apologize for the inconvenience. You may be able to automatically forward our email updates to your Google group through your email provider.
While no project of this magnitude can satisfy everyone, the goals of the project are to create a more reliable, sustainable and safe experience for all people who move throughout the corridor. We appreciate your enthusiasm for public transit and bikeways that support meaningful connections and movement for all community members.
Thank you,
East Colfax BRT Project Team
From: Bryan Wilson <bryan...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2026 6:11 AM
To: City Council District 10 <Distr...@denvergov.org>; frank <fr...@colfaxave.com>; sociali...@gmail.com
Cc: Chris Nicholson <Chris.N...@rtd-denver.com>; JoyAnn Ruscha <JoyAnn...@rtd-denver.com>; City Council District 5 <DenverC...@denvergov.org>; Denver Moves Bikes <bi...@denvergov.org>; east-cent...@googlegroups.com; east-...@googlegroups.com; Colfax BRT <colf...@denvergov.org>; DOTI Sidewalks <Side...@denvergov.org>; Haines, Amber <amber....@atkinsrealis.com>; City Council District 9 <Dist...@denvergov.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: FW: Ramp widths along Colfax BRT Project
Hello again, I'm now asking for my city council member and the local business improvement districts to see if they can find the answers to these questions. . . Why aren't we prioritizing 8-ft wide sidewalks along Colfax? Why are we installing
Hello again,
I'm now asking for my city council member and the local business improvement districts to see if they can find the answers to these questions...
Why aren't we prioritizing 8-ft wide sidewalks along Colfax?
Why are we installing signal posts and what seems to clearly be the Pedestrian access route?
I do understand budget constraints and why we can't widen every sidewalk, but I feel we can and should be installing 8-ft wide sidewalk ramps as often as possible.
Instead, we're installing new signal posts that result in sidewalk ramps that are incredibly narrow, especially at Transit stations.
I'm also concerned about the raised curbs being installed along sidewalks.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Respectfully,
Bryan Wilson
On Tue, Feb 10, 2026, 10:01 AM Bryan Wilson <bryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello again, Amber.
I just wanted to see if you had a chance to locate the documentation about the minimum sidewalk requirements.
I agree that they broadly state a minimum of 5 ft, but that minimum I think is different as the street types move up from residential to collector to arterial.
Just walked past Colfax at Williams, where I feel it's clear that we could have achieved an 8-ft wide ramp even if it wasn't required.
I also believed the raised curbs shouldn't be installed when reviewing the rules and regulations governing encroachments to the public right of way.
It's my understanding that these are not to obstruct water from flowing off the sidewalk into the tree lawn because it'll result in ice melt refreezing on the sidewalk.
I'll have to see if I can find the answer to my sidewalk question there.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Respectfully,
Bryan Wilson
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026, 11:42 AM Bryan Wilson <bryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you for the response, Amber.
Can you please clarify the "must-have" widths & where that is documented?
I've observed a number of developments upgrading to 8ft wide, so I find it hard to believe that they would spend extra money unnecessarily when it isn't required of them.
- South side of Colfax from Downing to Marion
- North side of Colfax from Milwaukee to Saint Paul
- South side of Colfax from Madison to Monroe
- North side of Colfax from Monroe to Garfield
- South side of Colfax from Garfield to Harrison
Just seems like there is one standard for developers & another for this project.
As for the signals, they're being relocated at many other intersections. Why can't they be relocated at these other locations the same way?
I just watched the signals get relocated on Colfax at Williams. Will we get 8ft wide ramps there?
I don't understand why 8ft wide widths seem to be prioritized for redevelopments, but not for this project.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Respectfully,
Bryan Wilson
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 10:57 AM Haines, Amber <Amber....@atkinsrealis.com> wrote:
Hi Bryan,
In response to your below inquiry, the design team followed the CCD standards for the “must have” widths. We did take the Complete Streets guidelines into consideration for the “where possible” widths, and DOTI committed to placing 8’ widths where we do not have above or below ground built condition conflicts. This specific location at Colfax/Vine Street has a signal and equipment preventing us from upsizing to the 8’ width.
Thanks,
From: Bryan Wilson <bryan...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 17, 2026 12:35 PM
To: City Council District 10 <distr...@denvergov.org>; Chris Nicholson <Chris.N...@rtd-denver.com>; JoyAnn Ruscha <JoyAnn...@rtd-denver.com>; City Council District 5 <DenverC...@denvergov.org>
Cc: Denver Moves Bikes <bi...@denvergov.org>; east-cent...@googlegroups.com <east-cent...@googlegroups.com>; east-...@googlegroups.com <east-...@googlegroups.com>; Colfax BRT <colf...@denvergov.org>
Subject: Ramp widths along Colfax BRT Project
Hello Council members Hinds & Sawyer, and RTD Directors Nicholson & Rusha,
Could you please connect with the Colfax BRT Project team to find out why we're not installing 8ft wide sidewalk ramps at intersections where there is sufficient space?
Here is an example at Colfax & Vine.
The Right-of-Way is clearly marked to the right indicating that there is plenty of space to accommodate a wider ramp. It's my understanding based on the Complete Streets Guidelines that the sidewalk & ramps along Colfax should be a minimum of 8ft wide, but wider where possible.
At other locations, like at City Park Esplanade, we could probably be installing 12ft wide ramps & designating it as a shared-use connection to the Josephine & York Street Stations.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DTnzbAikbwt/?igsh=NHllaWZvZ3RpajFi
I requested that in the prior email below.
Obviously, we won't be able to do that where buildings are in the way, but that isn't the case with Vine Street & other locations.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Please respond when you're able to get any information.
Respectfully,
Bryan Wilson
On Tue, Jan 6, 2026, 10:53 AM Bryan Wilson <bryan...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Please reference the Denver Moves Bikes Update and the plans for the Colfax BRT project.
Requesting both to be updated identifying the sidewalk along Colfax Ave between York and Detroit Street as shared-use.
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/f4fafe1405b6443da158f4d9e257887a
I added the sections in question with the yellow dots.
This will not only connect riders from the Colfax BRT transit station to the Carla Madison Rec Center, but also connect riders from the Carla Madison Rec Center to the future 16th Avenue neighborhood Bikeway to the East of Denver East High School.
This would be an excellent opportunity for the Colfax BRT project to install wider sidewalk ramps to accommodate Shared-use.
Thank you in advance for your help!
Respectfully,
Bryan Wilson
NOTICE – This email message and any attachments may contain information or material that is confidential, privileged, and/or subject to copyright or other rights. Any unauthorized viewing, disclosure, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of or reliance on this message or anything contained therein is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you believe you may have received this message in error, kindly inform the sender by return email and delete this message from your system. Thank you.
