Hi Fabiola,
We are investigating this.
It seems likely that there was an issue with the node.
You can try cloning and resubmitting while we investigate if you like.
I will credit your account for any time lost.
Mark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CIPRES Science Gateway Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
cipres-science-gatew...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cipres-science-gateway-users/7ae382de-4b34-431f-bca2-988dc461764en%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cipres-science-gateway-users/ca75acac-8177-4afe-8842-7fdb9399f822n%40googlegroups.com.
On Nov 4, 2024, at 5:55 AM, Fabiola Sepulveda <fabio...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi again,
Unfortunately, Phylobayes is a fairly slow and compute-intense code.
Your run of 12 hours used 48 cores, so the total charge for the run was 12 x 48 = 576 hours.
The run so far ran 35017 iterations, and you can only get about another 8 hours of run time using PhyloBayes.
If you need a Bayesian code, you could try MrBayes which is much faster, if it offers the tools you need..
Let me know if you have further questions.
Mark