Didact Thoughts

TLA

unread,

Jul 30, 2013, 8:42:29 PM7/30/13

to Cip...@googlegroups.com

Hay, I think I know why the Bass Track data was cut off. It was because the overall volume of the track was below -6db, it was at like -8db if I remember right, so we have got to make sure before we do a Track Divide that the track is at zero or we will lose data. Increasing the In-Treash my do the trick as well.

TLA on behalf of PHD

TLA

unread,

Jul 30, 2013, 8:46:27 PM7/30/13

to Cip...@googlegroups.com

I felt this was a great topic to track so I brought it in as a topic into the Ggroup.

So, are you saying the overall volume of the printed data itself captured within the phrase? Or the overall volume of the current location of the volume fader for that track containing the phrase?

TLA

Rob Wright

unread,

Jul 31, 2013, 9:18:39 AM7/31/13

to Cipher-Tu Productions on behalf of TLA

I was saying that the Overall track volume was Below -6, Witch means that it would cut anything out that is below that volume and not come back in tell it reached say -5 or anything above that. So if we know that the Real volume of a given track is say -5 we'd just make are "In-Threash" point is like -20 to -48 to insure we dont loss wanted data.

Im sure this is how that works.

From: TLA via Cipher-Tu Productions <cipher2+noreply-APn2wQfHLo0dMepK...@googlegroups.com>
To: Cip...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 7:46 PM
Subject: [C2p Ggroup] Re: Didact Thoughts

--
Cipher-Tu Productions
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cipher-Tu Productions" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Cipher2+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Rob Wright

unread,

Jul 31, 2013, 9:23:39 AM7/31/13

to Cipher-Tu Productions on behalf of TLA

The Volume Fader containing the track.

From: Rob Wright <pda...@yahoo.com>
To: Cipher-Tu Productions on behalf of TLA <cip...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: [C2p Ggroup] Re: Didact Thoughts

TLA

unread,

Jul 31, 2013, 5:24:24 PM7/31/13

to Cip...@googlegroups.com

I truly believe, and this is a hunch since we are not sure, that the physical placement of the fader has no bearing on how the phrase divide function carries out it's function. I believe that the DB level setting in phrase divide is in regard to what is already captured within the phrase itself, the size of the waveforms in the phrase is what counts, NOT the fader placement.

What are your thoughts on this?

TLA

On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 7:42:29 PM UTC-5, TLA wrote:

Rob Wright

unread,

Aug 7, 2013, 8:42:07 AM8/7/13

to Cipher-Tu Productions on behalf of TLA

But if that we'r true why would that data have disappeared?

To sum it up, I think the Thresh in&out is Volume of the track we do not want to play under the set level we choose. This determines ware the cutts will be made through out the Phrase. The margin is Time, if you we'r to change it to say, 3 full seconds, I bet it would cut 3 seconds of the start of the phrase and most likely after every cut made by the Phrase Divide. Likewise with are out point.

From: TLA via Cipher-Tu Productions <cipher2+noreply-APn2wQfHLo0dMepK...@googlegroups.com>
To: Cip...@googlegroups.com