Re: [Cincinnati 2600] Digest for cinci2600@googlegroups.com - 1 Message in 1 Topic
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Chris Anderson
Sep 29, 2012, 6:35:48 AM9/29/12
to cinc...@googlegroups.com
bytecode is tougher to obfuscate than old school compiled binaries.
especially managed code that uses MS's CLR.
one company i worked for used an off the shelf tool to obfuscate its
java codebase, but i have no idea how effective it was.
especially managed code that uses MS's CLR.
one company i worked for used an off the shelf tool to obfuscate its
java codebase, but i have no idea how effective it was.
Craig
Sep 30, 2012, 7:26:13 PM9/30/12
to cinc...@googlegroups.com
Bytecode like java and .net are trivial to reverse. Don't waste time with obfuscation. Doesn't work. If any one want details on how to bypass and reverse obfuscated VMs maybe we can do a session on a protection at Hive13.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages