LogBook-esque app
1 view
Skip to first unread message
arpit
Jun 4, 2008, 10:45:29 PM6/4/08
to cimlogbook
Check out
http://www.websector.de/blog/2008/06/01/the-new-thunderbolt-as3-console-based-on-adobe-air/
Its very similar to LogBook, although I still think logBook is cooler.
Still its worth a look.
http://www.websector.de/blog/2008/06/01/the-new-thunderbolt-as3-console-based-on-adobe-air/
Its very similar to LogBook, although I still think logBook is cooler.
Still its worth a look.
Kevin Fitzpatrick
Jun 5, 2008, 10:04:39 AM6/5/08
to cimlo...@googlegroups.com
The fact that it logs out to Firebug is HUGE for a large segment of
the front-end populace. Specifically, people who are working on
projects that rely on a large bit of JavaScript.
the front-end populace. Specifically, people who are working on
projects that rely on a large bit of JavaScript.
I would think that added Firebug support to the CIM Logging framework
would go a long way towards making it a worthwhile product for a
larger audience. I know that at one point I had written a Firebug
console target before the project went open source.
What do you guys think about adding this in? Maybe we can work with
the Thunderbolt team.
- Kevin
couchoud
Jun 5, 2008, 12:30:27 PM6/5/08
to cimlogbook
I think that adding firebug support would be a fantastic addition to
Logbook. I often use firebug for network monitoring while at the same
time using Logbook to monitor the inner workings of my app. Having
both consoles sitting along side one another would rock.
On Jun 5, 10:04 am, Kevin Fitzpatrick
Logbook. I often use firebug for network monitoring while at the same
time using Logbook to monitor the inner workings of my app. Having
both consoles sitting along side one another would rock.
On Jun 5, 10:04 am, Kevin Fitzpatrick
<kevin.m.a.fitzpatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The fact that it logs out to Firebug is HUGE for a large segment of
> the front-end populace. Specifically, people who are working on
> projects that rely on a large bit of JavaScript.
>
> I would think that added Firebug support to the CIM Logging framework
> would go a long way towards making it a worthwhile product for a
> larger audience. I know that at one point I had written a Firebug
> console target before the project went open source.
>
> What do you guys think about adding this in? Maybe we can work with
> the Thunderbolt team.
>
> - Kevin
>
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:45 PM, arpit wrote:
>
>
>
> > Check out
> >http://www.websector.de/blog/2008/06/01/the-new-thunderbolt-as3-conso...
> The fact that it logs out to Firebug is HUGE for a large segment of
> the front-end populace. Specifically, people who are working on
> projects that rely on a large bit of JavaScript.
>
> I would think that added Firebug support to the CIM Logging framework
> would go a long way towards making it a worthwhile product for a
> larger audience. I know that at one point I had written a Firebug
> console target before the project went open source.
>
> What do you guys think about adding this in? Maybe we can work with
> the Thunderbolt team.
>
> - Kevin
>
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 10:45 PM, arpit wrote:
>
>
>
> > Check out
Kevin Fitzpatrick
Jun 5, 2008, 1:53:07 PM6/5/08
to cimlo...@googlegroups.com
For me, it would be the ability to look at my JavaScript console
outputs along side my LocalConnection traces. I don't want to give up
LogBook's ability to filter and whatnot. But it would be nice to have
both options.
outputs along side my LocalConnection traces. I don't want to give up
LogBook's ability to filter and whatnot. But it would be nice to have
both options.
- Kevin
Mathur, Arpit
Jun 5, 2008, 3:07:21 PM6/5/08
to cimlo...@googlegroups.com
There is a firebug console in the checked in code, but I have never verified
it worked.
it worked.
On 6/5/08 1:53 PM, "Kevin Fitzpatrick" <kevin.m.a....@gmail.com>
wrote:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages