Ray Blockley wrote:
> Just to help get the full picture, I've been and measured the thread on my
> Vigo rack and cloth press:
> External diameter of thread: 1 7/16ths" or 36.5 mm (measured with vernier
> calipers).
> No ball bearing at end of thread. It is flat and polished (chromed?), and
> bears on a brass bush set inside the cast iron plate on the press plate.
> Food grade grease is supplied in a small tub for the thread and base-plate
> bearing surface.
Well, it seems they did a bit of work to reduce friction, which is a
good point. This would improve a bit the torque-load formula, to maybe
T = 0.16 F d
Note this is approximative - the exact formulation would use the
number of threads per inch and need more exact friction coefficient,
but it is accurate enough for our needs.
So, with this updated data (now that we know the diameter of the
screw), we can calculate the torque needed to get a load of 4 tons to
be 153 foot-pounds. This is a lot more than the torque required for
your car tyre bolts for example... And the feet of the press are
better be well bolted to the floor if one is to apply such a torque to
the screw... You would also need a longer handle (which acts as a
lever).
So, I will keep my first impression - I don't think this press
delivers much more than 2 tons of load.
Plus, consider that a hydraulic jack costs very little (here in
Canada, about 15$ for 4 tons, 25$ for 12 tons), and is ready to use.
Just the screw will cost more than that, and you will have to do some
welding to fix a handle on it and to weld the nut on a plate before
you can use it. The only disadvantage of the hydraulic jack is that
the stroke is limited, and I have to retract the jack in the middle of
the run, add some wood blocks and start again - a minor inconvenient.