On 21/09/2016 17:09, PHILIP ATKINSON wrote:
> Andrew, can you elaborate on this comment you made?
>
> Cider making like wine
> making goes straight through. Only beer brewers need to make a primary /
> secondary distinction as the sugar composition of the wort changes
> during fermentation.
>
> I'm wondering what is happening specifically in beer that is not
> happening in cider and what sugar composition changes occur.
The sugars in apple juice and grape juice are the simple monosaccharides
glucose and fructose, any sucrose being quickly 'inverted' to a mixture
of G & F. These are fully fermentable by all normal yeasts. [There is a
slight difference between 'glucophilic and 'fructophilic' yeast strains
but not enough to make any practical difference]. The sugar composition
does not markedly change during cider or wine fermentation in most cases.
Beer wort is very different. Because of its production from malt, it
contains some glucose, some maltose (a disaccharide) and rather a lot of
oligosaccharides such as maltotriose, maltotetrose and other higher
oligomers. All brewers yeasts can assimilate glucose, and most can
handle maltose though a little more slowly. They begin to struggle when
it comes to maltotriose and above, and it's at this point that
fermentation begins to slow down markedly. The distinction between
primary and secondary fermentation in beer wort is pretty much the point
at which all the glucose and most of the maltose has gone and the
maltose oligomers are all that is left, because this is something of a
discontinuity in the fermentation process.
Some yeasts are better at handling the oligosaccharides than others and
these are known as high attenuation yeasts. By contrast low attenuation
yeasts are really only adapted to handle glucose and maltose. However,
these concepts have no place in wine or cider making, nor does the
primary / secondary distinction, because all apple and grape sugars are
fully fermentable and the sugar composition does not change during
fermentation as it does in brewing wort.
Claude made the good point that often in cider there is a turbulent
initial phase and a quieter later phase. This is especially true when
dealing with unsulphited wild fermentations, since there is a
'succession' of yeast species. The initial fermentation is vigorously
conducted by apiculate yeasts, while the quieter phase is conducted by
Saccharomyces strains. I think this is why some people apply the terms
'primary' and 'secondary' to these two phases. But it's not the same
change in sugar composition and speed of assimilation that takes place
in beer brewing.
To further complicate things, some cidermakers and winemakers use the
word 'secondary' to refer to a controlled yeast fermentation in the
bottle (natural conditioning to get sparkle), and some cidermakers and
winemakers use the term 'secondary' to refer to the malo-lactic change
which is bacterial and does produce carbon dioxide although it has
nothing to do with yeast nor the assimilation of sugar.
That's why I think all these terms are best avoided in cidermaking. They
only lead to confusion.
I hope this helps.
Andrew
--
near Oxford, UK