>
> The more I spoke to my EHO the more I realised that he had no idea
> what the process of traditional cidermaking is, he seems to think that
> Im producing apple juice!
This story seems to come up often outside of the traditional areas. Are
you a member of the Welsh Cider and Perry Society?
http://www.welshcider.co.uk/ They may have some advice.
Andrew
--
Wittenham Hill Cider Page
http://www.cider.org.uk
I don't know of any data to show that rat-borne infections are destroyed
by cider although I would guess that they might be - if you think about
it, it would have been a pretty bizarre piece of work to have done
specifically because it would imply that a person was tolerant of rats
crawling all over their apples. Rats are opportunists and if there is
other easier stuff they can feed on, they will. Personally I found that
simple chicken mesh protection over stored apples elevated above ground
was sufficient to keep them out where other food was available - I also
used (covered) bait boxes outdoors near to my apples. At very least you
should put some such protective measures in case. But I do not sell my
cider so I have never had a personal EHO visit.
There are two general problems here:
One is that the whole Food Safety landscape has changed hugely in the
last 20 years. Issues like E coli 0157H and BSE and attributable
consumer deaths have forced EHO's to become much more vigilant, not just
because new legislation demands it but also because they have been
criticised at inquests and enquiries for not being more pro-active and
for falling down on the job. I think a lot of cider makers, seeing
themselves as rural craftsmen, have not caught up with these changes and
the fact that in law they are food production businesses now bound and
ruled like all others. What worked even in the 1980's does not work now.
But against that is the fact that cider requires some form of
proportionality of approach. It is inherently low risk due to the
alcohol and the low pH of the product. It is not like meat or dairy.
Badly-made cider is very unlikely to kill a person. The EHO's in the
main production areas understand this and they know what is 'acceptable
practice' because the test of time has shown it to be so. But in new
areas the EHO's have nothing to fall back on, and they will start from
the viewpoint of generic 'best practice' for food production overall,
which is likely to be much more stringent.
None of this helps you now. Sadly you are looking for documentation that
does not, and never has, existed. My feeling is that a one or two page
semi-official briefing document on acceptable practice in small-scale
cidermaking for EHO's and other interested parties is long overdue. I
think this is something that the 3 regional associations should jointly
push for through the NACM to which they are affiliated. It will cost
money, because some professional will have to be paid to research and to
write it, but if it then carries the NACM endorsement it could be lodged
with the Food Standards Agency and EHO's as a "Code of Practice". Nick
Bradstock tells me that there may be as many as 500 small cidermakers in
the UK. If they all club together a few quid to prepare such a document,
it would be a good investment, I think.
> My feeling is that a one or two page semi-official briefing document on
> acceptable practice in small-scale cidermaking for EHO's and other
> interested parties is long overdue. I think this is something that the 3
> regional associations should jointly push for through the NACM to which
> they are affiliated. It will cost money, because some professional will
> have to be paid to research and to write it, but if it then carries the
> NACM endorsement it could be lodged with the Food Standards Agency and
> EHO's as a "Code of Practice". Nick Bradstock tells me that there may be
> as many as 500 small cidermakers in the UK. If they all club together a
> few quid to prepare such a document, it would be a good investment, I
> think.
I've been following this thread with great interest for a couple of reasons.
The first is that we also live in a 'historically' non-cider-making area and
the second being that I sympathise greatly with the concerns Gethin is
having, especially after drinking and enjoying his ciders at the Clytha.
Only a few years ago I was considering throwing the whole craft commercial
cider-making idea into touch after initial contacts with my EHO and TS folk;
some may remember that time and I remember it as a very black and depressing
time. However, we persevered and came through - though I still keep TS at
arms length and my wallet is still having nightmares!
The idea of such a document as Andrew is suggesting is, I feel, an excellent
one. We will then all have some evidence of what the problems - real or
not - are and hopefully a clear plan of how to overcome them; and of course
we will have a pukka document to refer EHO's and TS folk to. I'd be very
interested in seeing this idea taken further. If it costs me a few pounds to
contribute to this research, I'd consider it money well spent. Particularly
in light of the worries and headache that ill-informed EHO's and TS folk can
bring. I had to fork out plenty dollar to meet what the EHO's demanded, yet
experience shows that others have been passed with nothing akin to what
we've had to set up, while others again have had much more draconian
measures enforced.
In my travels around the UK visiting cider-makers I hear horror stories such
as that of EHO's demanding floor-to-ceiling 316 S/Steel, or emptying then
steam and pressure washing of all cider-making buildings (ceilings, walls
and all) on a 6-monthly or yearly cycle. We need some form of specification
that we can work to and use to fight our corners.
Bring it on.
Good luck, Gethin.
Cheers,
Ray.
http://hucknallciderco.blogspot.com/
http://torkardcider.moonfruit.com/
Tim in Dorset
Andrew wrote:
Bring it on.
Good luck, Gethin.
Cheers,
Ray.
http://hucknallciderco.blogspot.com/
http://torkardcider.moonfruit.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cider Workshop" group.
To post to this group, send email to cider-w...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cider-worksho...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cider-workshop?hl=en.
David Llewellyn
Tim in Dorset
David Llewellyn
--
> Bring it on.
I think I'm right in saying that annual meeting for small cidermakers
with the NACM is coming up very soon. Those of you who are members of
one of the regional associations (as you should all be IMHO) will
doubtless have had the details. I suggest one of you aim to get it on
the Agenda or at least as AOB. Then the idea can have its first outing
and kick around.
BTW this shouldn't be seen as a plan to allow dirt and filth in through
the back door. Cider makers *are* food producers, no question. It's a
mater of being proportionate in the context of what is inherently a
low-risk food production process.
In summary, there is cause to be scrupulously careful in handling edible
food crops (eg: apples for direct consumption as fruit or fresh-pressed
untreated juice) but a proportionately less stringent approach (but still
careful) to the handling of raw material for processing.
As far as orcharding is concerned, NACM is revising its 'Growing Cider
Apples' handbook (which is after all aimed at people with some knowledge
already of procedures) but the entry on grazing, etc, remains the same and
as indicated below.
To write a handbook on EH matters would be a major task and require a
specialist author (Andrew?) - clearly if there's a demand for such a thing
then NACM would consider it but I have to say that such matters are usually
for individual members to equip themselves and NACM itself can only provide
an overview and advise of changing official attitudes, new regs etc.
The NACM day Andrew refers to is on 10/02/11 at Westons (so there probably
won't be too much interest in it?) and attendance, if you do wish to explore
the possibility, is free but as a member of SWECA, TCC&PA or the WC&PS.
All the best
Nick
General:
- No cases known that might give cause for concern.
- US-style 'cider' and fresh apple / pear juice are a very different
matter and should at least be filtered and/or pasteurised before consumption
(FSA aware).
Specific:
The UK cider making process inc. arrested fermentation and low-alcohol
ciders (includes pears/perry/pear cider):
1. Apples growing in the orchard - exposed to more (wild) animals, etc,
than just stock (and dogs) which are controlled as in the "Growing Cider
Apples" handbook (remove stock at least 56 days before harvest and dog
owners to take away dog faeces).
2. Apples picked up from the ground - exposed to soil contamination.
3. Apples washed in cider mill and generally inspected with worst
rots/damaged fruit removed.
4. Milling and pressing so that conditions are immediate exposure to pH
typically in the range 3.5 - 3.9.
5. Sulphiting, typically at 100 mg / litre as SO2 (legal max in
finished cider 200) depending on pH.
6. Fermentation over say 21 days, could be longer - strongly reductive
conditions with alcohol developing to at least 5% abv.
7. Maturation/storage - say another 21 days at ambient/cool
temperatures but possibly up to 300 days for farm cider.
8. Preparation for packaging - typically includes carbonation but with
some dissolved oxygen present and more sulphiting (ca. 50 mg/l).
9. Filtration - depth x 2 stage and typically to about 0.5 micron or
ultra-filtration to perhaps 0.1 micron or even below.
10. Pasteurization - continuous or in-pack (no spec given).
11. Warehousing - with final QC checks inc micro (for yeasts mainly, on
media suited to fungi but bacteria observable).
12. Relatively poor nutrient status of apple juice and cider - high
sugar perhaps but low nitrogen and low vitamin B1.
Notes:
For Farm Cider the process might stop at 7. For low-alcohol / arrested
fermentation cider, the means of achieving this are technically quite
intensive and carried out only in well-equipped and scientifically-literate
cider mills.
> Bring it on.
Andrew
Therefore, I have a couple of documents and a HACCP written out for my own
production which I hope to share with you... although for at least one of
them I need to go away and find out who gave it to me and ask their
permission.
Basically, when I initially spoke to them we agreed that they would go off
and research cider making (and speak to one of the cider making counties
EHO's). When we met, I gave them the document to which I adhere to, plus the
HACCP and the TS certificate ref patulin etc. Yes, even though they had
asked about it, patulin was still important to them... and he was very happy
that TS had been there first and tested it.
They took a look at my cider garage and gave it the OK as per the guidelines
I work to, and then asked if I could provide a one off document to show what
I do (as per the HACCP). The only other thing we discussed was working out
how we could agree on a cleaning schedule (document) that was not too
onerous, but would be sufficient to demonstrate that I do what I say I do.
The argument is that, even if I do a check list, it doesn't prove that I did
it - although not doing it leaves no defence at all.
Its only right to point out that I haven't had any kind of 'letter' from
them yet, so the situation could change.
I will post more later (am in Manchester with no access to the information I
require to post), and will probably want to send it to Andrew/Nick first for
their opinion. As it is to do with my business model I am not sure what
needs doing to make it universal (if it can be made universal), but at least
it would be a start.
All the best
Jez
Tim in Dorset
All the best
Jez
--