first experiments, first hello

107 views
Skip to first unread message

Gyuri

unread,
Jan 22, 2012, 4:54:59 AM1/22/12
to Cider Workshop
Hi,

I've been following the discussions for a while, but this is my very
first post here. Easy on me please.:)

I'd like to do my first steps in cider making next weekend. I know
it's late, it's cold. I'd rather consider it chemical experiment at
this stage. The goal is to gain some experience by next Autumn. If the
result is drinkable, I'd be more than happy.

I'd like to get 150 kg apples. Unfortunately I only have dessert
apples available: Golden, Jonagold and Idared. I know it isn't ideal,
but that's available in January here. In long term I'm planning to
find the best local varieties, but it needs time since cider making
isn't part of our culture.
After pressing I'd like to do the usual measures (SG, pH and maybe
acidity), just to see how they work. I'd like to buy some 10l (2.2
gallon) vessels.
Add the basic things to the juice, like pectolytic enzyme, sulphur
dioxide and cultured wine yeast. Maybe I'll fine tune acidity and add
some tannin to some vessels.

How does this plan sound to you? Which type of apple would you buy?
What do you think does it worth the time and energy to blend them or
they have just similar character?
Is 10l vessel appropriate in size as a "test tube"?

Thanks,

Gyuri

Andrew Lea

unread,
Jan 22, 2012, 5:52:16 AM1/22/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
On 22/01/2012 09:54, Gyuri wrote:

> I'd like to do my first steps in cider making next weekend. I know
> it's late, it's cold. I'd rather consider it chemical experiment at
> this stage. The goal is to gain some experience by next Autumn. If the
> result is drinkable, I'd be more than happy.
>
> I'd like to get 150 kg apples. Unfortunately I only have dessert
> apples available: Golden, Jonagold and Idared. I know it isn't ideal,
> but that's available in January here. In long term I'm planning to
> find the best local varieties, but it needs time since cider making
> isn't part of our culture.

Welcome to the group! Where is 'here' for you? Which country are you in?

Many people say that Jonagold can be surprisingly successful for cider.
Idared and Golden Delicious do not ripen easily here in the UK, but of
the two I think Idared would probably be better for cider. Mature
Goldens can be difficult to press and may not have much acid. I think
all 3 will come out quite different. Can you try all 3 as separate
varieties? And as a blend as well? 10L is plenty for test purposes.

Good Luck!

Andrew


--
Cider Workshop Website
www.ciderworkshop.com

Andrew's Website
www.cider.org.uk

Claude Jolicoeur

unread,
Jan 22, 2012, 12:34:10 PM1/22/12
to Cider Workshop, Gyuri
Gyuri wrote:
> I'd like to get 150 kg apples. Unfortunately I only have dessert
> apples available: Golden, Jonagold and Idared. I know it isn't ideal,
> but that's available in January here.

I'll add a few points to what Andrew wrote...
From what I know of the 3 varieties:
Idared, high acidity and medium-high SG
Golden Delicious, medium acidity, medium-low SG
Jonagold, never tested, but as Andrew said, there are reports saying
it is quite good for cider.
Suitability of an apple for cider varies a lot with factors like how
and where it has been grown. You may get large variations in SG and
acidity. But probably Idared will be too sharp by itself but would
make a good blend with Golden Delidious. Then Jonagold could be tried
by itself. So I would probably make 2 batches, one 50-50 Idared-
Golden, and one Jonagold SV. And at bottling, I would probably blend
together a part of each into a 50-25-25 blend - you would then have 3
different blends to taste.

Ideally however, if you could get a sample of juice from each variety
before buying your 150 kg, you could then measure SG and acidity, and
from this, plan your blend. We would be happy to help.

With 150 kg, you will get a good 80 litres of juice - this is a large
amount for a first trial - you could settle for less.
For a first trial, I wouldn't suggest to play with acidity and tanin -
there is no reason why the cider wouldn't be OK naturally. I did my 10
first years of cidermaking without any significant amount of tanic
apples in the cider and it was nevertheless very good.

About the material you will need, don't forget a racking tube. For
each batch you will need a large plastic bucket for primary
fermentation, and ideally, a glass carboy (plastic is also possible)
with an airlock for secondary and maturation. These carboys are
available in 3, 5 and 6 US gallons (appx 11, 19 and 23 litres) - the
least expensive being the 19 L size, and I also find this size the
most useful. If you make 80 L, you could have 4 of those.

Claude

Rudy Petershofer

unread,
Jan 22, 2012, 12:15:45 PM1/22/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
On 12-01-22 4:54 AM, "Gyuri" <szl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I've been following the discussions for a while, but this is my very
>first post here. Easy on me please.:)
>
>I'd like to do my first steps in cider making next weekend. I know
>it's late, it's cold. I'd rather consider it chemical experiment at
>this stage. The goal is to gain some experience by next Autumn. If the
>result is drinkable, I'd be more than happy.

Hi Gyuri,

Like you, I am new to the group and new to cider making. I'm still stunned
that I'm able to benefit from the wisdom of Andrew Lea, Claude Jolicoeur
and many others on a daily basis. I started making cider in August after
buying two 24 litre buckets of delicious, freshly pressed and UV
pasteurized juice from two brothers in Clarington, Ontario. They run a
press that their Swiss grandfather started many years ago. My 18th and
19th 24L batches are currently fermenting. The goal was to build up an
inventory that could age properly (well that was the theory). Along the
way I've read the books by Andrew Lea (the gospel), Ben Watson, Annie
Proulx and Simon McKie. They've all been great reading and I highly
recommend them.

The varieties used have been various combinations of Macintosh, Golden
Russet, Northern Spy, Empire, Greening and Mutsu. I'm not sure that the
combination of Mac and Spy would meet with the approval of most cider
purists, but I salivate in anticipation of the tartness and fruitiness and
that combination.

Also like, you, I expect to experiment with acidity and tannin. At the
moment I'm playing with yeast. I recently finished three batches each one
using a different yeast. Until now, I've used Lavlin E-1118 for all my
batches. I understand it to be a champagne yeast. However, I've often
found that the champagne taste tends to overpower the fruitiness of the
cider. For the three test batches I used Lavlin E-1118, Wyeast English
Cider yeast (4766) and Wyeast Sweet Mead yeast (4184). I won't know the
results for a few months but I confess to sneaking a taste during racking
and they are distinctly different. The cider yeast batch is delightfully
"apply", the mead yeast batch is very "mellow" and the E-1118 somehow
tastes more "sophisticated" but it has sulphur overtones initially. Based
on my brief experience, I'd encourage you to add yeast variety, as a
variable, to your experiments.

Rudy Petershofer
Markham, Canada


Szlamka Gyuri

unread,
Jan 23, 2012, 6:28:35 AM1/23/12
to Cider Workshop, cjol...@gmail.com
Thank you for your detailed answers. 

I know it's just my first test and I may think too forward. Later on, if I like my cider, I'd like to be able to reproduce it in bigger scale. That's why I run tests.:)
For some reason I believed that if I go with a little bigger (10l) amounts, it helps me to keep things better under control, the process will be more stable and more like in bigger scale. Or am I wrong? What amount would you recommend?

I'll get the apples from a cold storage, close to the orchard. I hope they won't show that much maturation.  

I think I'll loose the tannin and acid experiments for now. I'd like to ferment all the 3 variety separately, even if some of them has terrible taste (this should be part of the experiment). The fourth would be an Idared-Golden blend as Claude recommended. I'll try to measure and post acidity and SG as soon as I can after pressing the juice. I can do blending on the day after according to your recommendations, just before I add yeast.

I have no access to cider yeast at the moment, so I'll go with wine yeast, but I haven't selected any yet. Do you have any tip how to pick one?

My last question for today is about pectolytic enzyme. Andrew advised on www.cider.org.uk that it is supposed to be added to the freshly pressed juice. Wouldn't it help if I added some enzyme to the pulp before pressing too? Wouldn't I get more juice?

Thank you for your comments again. I really appreciate your help. Oh, I nearly forgot, I'm writing from Hungary.  

Gyuri




2012/1/22 Claude Jolicoeur <cjol...@gmail.com>

Claude Jolicoeur

unread,
Jan 23, 2012, 11:43:48 AM1/23/12
to Cider Workshop
Szlamka Gyuri wrote:
> For some reason I believed that if I go with a little bigger (10l) amounts,

I am not too sure I understand here. 10L is bigger than what? Actually
10L is quite small.

> I'll get the apples from a cold storage, close to the orchard. I hope they
> won't show that much maturation.

I wouldn't worry about overmaturation. I would even say that if the
apples are still very hard coming out of storage, you could wait a
little while until they get softer before pressing - slightly overripe
apples tend to have less Nitrogen, and their pectins will have
transformed. This might give you a better cider.

> I have no access to cider yeast at the moment, so I'll go with wine yeast,
> but I haven't selected any yet. Do you have any tip how to pick one?

Champagne yeasts are usually good for cider. This type of yeast is
surely a good choice for a beginner. When you have more experience,
you can then play with yeast type.

> Thank you for your comments again. I really appreciate your help. Oh, I
> nearly forgot, I'm writing from Hungary.

Great! Soon I will be able to go all around the world and visit cider
friends!
Claude

Andrew Lea

unread,
Jan 23, 2012, 12:05:45 PM1/23/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
On 23/01/2012 11:28, Szlamka Gyuri wrote:

> For some reason I believed that if I go with a little bigger (10l)
> amounts, it helps me to keep things better under control, the process
> will be more stable and more like in bigger scale. Or am I wrong? What
> amount would you recommend?

Obviously a large vessel (> 100 L) will be more buffered against
temperature changes, pick-up of air etc. But 10L is fine for tests of
different varieties, different yeasts etc. When I worked in cider
research we used 10 - 15L glass jars for such experiments (though they
were in a temperature controlled room).

>
> My last question for today is about pectolytic enzyme. Andrew advised on

> www.cider.org.uk <http://www.cider.org.uk/> that it is supposed to be


> added to the freshly pressed juice. Wouldn't it help if I added some
> enzyme to the pulp before pressing too? Wouldn't I get more juice?

You might get more juice if you add it to the pulp, and it may make
late-stored dessert apples easier to press. But you would need to leave
the treated pulp overnight in the cold with the enzyme before pressing
to get a good effect of pectin breakdown. (You will probably need more
enzyme if you do this.) In fact special branded enzymes are sold for
pulp enzyming and they are a different blend from the standard juice
enzymes (eg compare Erbsloeh Fructozyme P and MA). But these are used
mostly by large producers and on a small scale might prove quite
expensive to get hold of.

simoncider

unread,
Jan 25, 2012, 9:17:44 AM1/25/12
to Cider Workshop


On Jan 22, 9:54 am, Gyuri <szla...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd like to get 150 kg apples. Unfortunately I only have dessert
> apples available: Golden, Jonagold and Idared. I know it isn't ideal,
> but that's available in January here. In long term I'm planning to
> find the best local varieties, but it needs time since cider making
> isn't part of our culture.


Hey Gyuri,

We have made plenty of cider from Idareds with great success,
definitely haven't got the depth of flavour that you'd expect from the
traditional cider apples, but i've had enough dessert apple cider to
actually prefer the taste now!
Have also had success with Jonagold, but would agree with previous
comments that Golden Delicious is difficult to press and not really
worth the bother.

Good Luck!

Simon.

Szlamka Gyuri

unread,
Feb 8, 2012, 5:41:30 PM2/8/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for all the valuable info. Things happens slower in cidermaking, than one would expect.:) 
Anyway, I did the very first measurements today. 
Results are a somewhat different than I expected. The apple variety, I tested, was Jonagold.

SG is 1046 which has 5.6% potential alc, pretty much at the borderline. pH was 4.1, I actually expected much lower.

The real headache was titration. Sulphuric acid was 5 mg/l (should be 0.7% malic acid). The bad news is that this was the lowest end of the scale, unfortunately this set can't measure below 5 mg/l. 
What this set can measure is "titratable" acid. I have no idea what "titratable" means in English, I just translated it as it is. The process was simple, I had to add NaOH to the juice, till it's colour turns to blue. The result is much more reliable here (at the middle of the scale), but I have no clue what it means in cider terms: 5g/l.  
What do you think, can I use this number or should I look for some other kit?

Thanks,

Gyuri
 

Andrew Lea

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 3:56:53 AM2/9/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
On 08/02/2012 22:41, Szlamka Gyuri wrote:

>
> The real headache was titration. Sulphuric acid was 5 mg/l (should be
> 0.7% malic acid). The bad news is that this was the lowest end of the
> scale, unfortunately this set can't measure below 5 mg/l.
> What this set can measure is "titratable" acid. I have no idea what
> "titratable" means in English, I just translated it as it is. The
> process was simple, I had to add NaOH to the juice, till it's colour
> turns to blue. The result is much more reliable here (at the middle of
> the scale), but I have no clue what it means in cider terms: 5g/l.
> What do you think, can I use this number or should I look for some other
> kit?

I don't really understand your question, but ...

"Titratable acid" just means "acid analysed by a titration method" i.e.
by neutralisation with alkali (base) against an indicator. Which is what
you are doing.

A result expressed as "5 grams per litre as sulphuric acid" needs to be
multiplied by 1.4 to convert it to grams per litre as malic acid. So 5
g/L as sulphuric becomes 7 g/L as malic. Or 0.7% of course.

(I don't understand where your 5 mg/L comes in. That is 1000 times
lower. Maybe that's just a typo?)

Andrew


--
Wittenham Hill Cider Portal
www.cider.org.uk

Szlamka Gyuri

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 4:43:25 PM2/9/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
I'm sorry about the confusion. I'm not only struggling with the craft of cidermaking, but with the terminology on two languages as well. Moreover it was too late when I posted and I made a big mistake.

I'd like to measure total acidity as you recommend in your book as well as on your site. I bought a titration kit, that is widely used by winemakers here. Now I know that this kit measures total (titratable) acidity and free sulphite. 
Total acid was 5 g/l and free sulphite was below 5 mg/l. No surprise in a freshly pressed apple juice. It wasn't a typo, this measurement has no sense at this stage. I confused free sulphite (H2SO3) with sulphuric acid (H2SO4). I'm sorry about that, it was a translation mistake. 
I'll find an other kit for measuring malic acid, but I have time to do that.

Thank you,

Gyuri

  



--
Visit our website: http://www.ciderworkshop.com


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cider Workshop" group.
To post to this group, send email to cider-workshop@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cider-workshop+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cider-workshop?hl=en

Andrew Lea

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 4:51:17 PM2/9/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
On 09/02/2012 21:43, Szlamka Gyuri wrote:
>
> Total acid was 5 g/l and free sulphite was below 5 mg/l. No surprise in
> a freshly pressed apple juice. It wasn't a typo, this measurement has no
> sense at this stage. I confused free sulphite (H2SO3) with sulphuric
> acid (H2SO4). I'm sorry about that, it was a translation mistake.
> I'll find an other kit for measuring malic acid, but I have time to do that.

OK I understand about the SO2 confusion. If you didn't add any, then
there won't be any there. You don't need to buy another kit for the
malic acid. The titration kits do not measure *specific* acids, they
measure any acid that is present. If the value is expressed "as
sulphuric", just multiply by 1.4 to convert it to "as malic".

Szlamka Gyuri

unread,
Feb 9, 2012, 4:54:58 PM2/9/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
Oh I see, thanks for making that clear. 

Szlamka Gyuri

unread,
Feb 12, 2012, 4:47:59 AM2/12/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
I finished all the measurements today. As much as I can judge, there is no sense to blend these varieties, because they show pretty similar characteristics. Interestingly I expected these apples to be much more acid.

Mutsu
SG: 1054
4.0pH 
total acid: 3g/l

Idared
SG: 1052
3.8pH 
total acid: 5.5g/l

Starking
SG: 1054
4.3pH
total acid: 1.5 g/l

Golden
SG: 1060
3.8 pH
total acid: 5g/l

Jonagold 
SG: 1046
4.1 pH
total acid: 3.5g/l (last time I did this wrong)


Thanks,


Gyuri

Andrew Lea

unread,
Feb 12, 2012, 5:00:50 AM2/12/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
On 12/02/2012 09:47, Szlamka Gyuri wrote:
> I finished all the measurements today. As much as I can judge, there is
> no sense to blend these varieties, because they show pretty similar
> characteristics.

Yes but there is much more to flavour than just pH and acid. Anyway you
can blend the ciders later. One reason for blending the juice now is to
get the pH as low as you can for protection against adverse moulds and
bacteria and so you do not have to add too much SO2.

Interestingly I expected these apples to be much more acid.

It is now mid-February. They will have had 4 months or so in store.
During that time some of the acid will have been lost by respiration.
When the apples were fresh they were probably more acid.

Szlamka Gyuri

unread,
Feb 20, 2012, 5:04:03 AM2/20/12
to cider-w...@googlegroups.com
Thank you for all your help and support. The juice is waiting in the vessels for yeast to do it's job. 
Hopefully it will be fermented and matured by the time Claude starts his world tour.:) But I'm happy to show any of you around anyway. 

If you don't mind, I'll share some of my experiences, it may help for other newcomers in the future.

I managed to get 40 Liter juice with a stronger kitchen juicer (1200W, I could feed it with apples without halving) in a day. It may sound weird for first, but it worked better than I expected. The major drawback of this method is that the juicer basically mashes the apple and the juice gets full with fiber very quickly. To avoid this, I had to clean the juicer's filter after pressing every Liter and filter the juice again with a cloth. Pectolytic enzyme did the rest of the job and the juice was clear on the next day. Pressing juice this way is pretty tedious, but might be a good option for beginners and kitchen scale cider makers on low(er) budget. The juice yield was around 50%.

It was great fun. We enjoyed the work so much, that I started to think how to make it on bigger scale. I may build a rack and cloth press by the Atumn, but it's an other topic.


Gyuri





Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages