> I'd like to do my first steps in cider making next weekend. I know
> it's late, it's cold. I'd rather consider it chemical experiment at
> this stage. The goal is to gain some experience by next Autumn. If the
> result is drinkable, I'd be more than happy.
>
> I'd like to get 150 kg apples. Unfortunately I only have dessert
> apples available: Golden, Jonagold and Idared. I know it isn't ideal,
> but that's available in January here. In long term I'm planning to
> find the best local varieties, but it needs time since cider making
> isn't part of our culture.
Welcome to the group! Where is 'here' for you? Which country are you in?
Many people say that Jonagold can be surprisingly successful for cider.
Idared and Golden Delicious do not ripen easily here in the UK, but of
the two I think Idared would probably be better for cider. Mature
Goldens can be difficult to press and may not have much acid. I think
all 3 will come out quite different. Can you try all 3 as separate
varieties? And as a blend as well? 10L is plenty for test purposes.
Good Luck!
Andrew
--
Cider Workshop Website
www.ciderworkshop.com
Andrew's Website
www.cider.org.uk
>Hi,
>
>I've been following the discussions for a while, but this is my very
>first post here. Easy on me please.:)
>
>I'd like to do my first steps in cider making next weekend. I know
>it's late, it's cold. I'd rather consider it chemical experiment at
>this stage. The goal is to gain some experience by next Autumn. If the
>result is drinkable, I'd be more than happy.
Hi Gyuri,
Like you, I am new to the group and new to cider making. I'm still stunned
that I'm able to benefit from the wisdom of Andrew Lea, Claude Jolicoeur
and many others on a daily basis. I started making cider in August after
buying two 24 litre buckets of delicious, freshly pressed and UV
pasteurized juice from two brothers in Clarington, Ontario. They run a
press that their Swiss grandfather started many years ago. My 18th and
19th 24L batches are currently fermenting. The goal was to build up an
inventory that could age properly (well that was the theory). Along the
way I've read the books by Andrew Lea (the gospel), Ben Watson, Annie
Proulx and Simon McKie. They've all been great reading and I highly
recommend them.
The varieties used have been various combinations of Macintosh, Golden
Russet, Northern Spy, Empire, Greening and Mutsu. I'm not sure that the
combination of Mac and Spy would meet with the approval of most cider
purists, but I salivate in anticipation of the tartness and fruitiness and
that combination.
Also like, you, I expect to experiment with acidity and tannin. At the
moment I'm playing with yeast. I recently finished three batches each one
using a different yeast. Until now, I've used Lavlin E-1118 for all my
batches. I understand it to be a champagne yeast. However, I've often
found that the champagne taste tends to overpower the fruitiness of the
cider. For the three test batches I used Lavlin E-1118, Wyeast English
Cider yeast (4766) and Wyeast Sweet Mead yeast (4184). I won't know the
results for a few months but I confess to sneaking a taste during racking
and they are distinctly different. The cider yeast batch is delightfully
"apply", the mead yeast batch is very "mellow" and the E-1118 somehow
tastes more "sophisticated" but it has sulphur overtones initially. Based
on my brief experience, I'd encourage you to add yeast variety, as a
variable, to your experiments.
Rudy Petershofer
Markham, Canada
> For some reason I believed that if I go with a little bigger (10l)
> amounts, it helps me to keep things better under control, the process
> will be more stable and more like in bigger scale. Or am I wrong? What
> amount would you recommend?
Obviously a large vessel (> 100 L) will be more buffered against
temperature changes, pick-up of air etc. But 10L is fine for tests of
different varieties, different yeasts etc. When I worked in cider
research we used 10 - 15L glass jars for such experiments (though they
were in a temperature controlled room).
>
> My last question for today is about pectolytic enzyme. Andrew advised on
> www.cider.org.uk <http://www.cider.org.uk/> that it is supposed to be
> added to the freshly pressed juice. Wouldn't it help if I added some
> enzyme to the pulp before pressing too? Wouldn't I get more juice?
You might get more juice if you add it to the pulp, and it may make
late-stored dessert apples easier to press. But you would need to leave
the treated pulp overnight in the cold with the enzyme before pressing
to get a good effect of pectin breakdown. (You will probably need more
enzyme if you do this.) In fact special branded enzymes are sold for
pulp enzyming and they are a different blend from the standard juice
enzymes (eg compare Erbsloeh Fructozyme P and MA). But these are used
mostly by large producers and on a small scale might prove quite
expensive to get hold of.
>
> The real headache was titration. Sulphuric acid was 5 mg/l (should be
> 0.7% malic acid). The bad news is that this was the lowest end of the
> scale, unfortunately this set can't measure below 5 mg/l.
> What this set can measure is "titratable" acid. I have no idea what
> "titratable" means in English, I just translated it as it is. The
> process was simple, I had to add NaOH to the juice, till it's colour
> turns to blue. The result is much more reliable here (at the middle of
> the scale), but I have no clue what it means in cider terms: 5g/l.
> What do you think, can I use this number or should I look for some other
> kit?
I don't really understand your question, but ...
"Titratable acid" just means "acid analysed by a titration method" i.e.
by neutralisation with alkali (base) against an indicator. Which is what
you are doing.
A result expressed as "5 grams per litre as sulphuric acid" needs to be
multiplied by 1.4 to convert it to grams per litre as malic acid. So 5
g/L as sulphuric becomes 7 g/L as malic. Or 0.7% of course.
(I don't understand where your 5 mg/L comes in. That is 1000 times
lower. Maybe that's just a typo?)
Andrew
--
Wittenham Hill Cider Portal
www.cider.org.uk
--
Visit our website: http://www.ciderworkshop.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cider Workshop" group.
To post to this group, send email to cider-workshop@googlegroups.com
OK I understand about the SO2 confusion. If you didn't add any, then
there won't be any there. You don't need to buy another kit for the
malic acid. The titration kits do not measure *specific* acids, they
measure any acid that is present. If the value is expressed "as
sulphuric", just multiply by 1.4 to convert it to "as malic".
Yes but there is much more to flavour than just pH and acid. Anyway you
can blend the ciders later. One reason for blending the juice now is to
get the pH as low as you can for protection against adverse moulds and
bacteria and so you do not have to add too much SO2.
Interestingly I expected these apples to be much more acid.
It is now mid-February. They will have had 4 months or so in store.
During that time some of the acid will have been lost by respiration.
When the apples were fresh they were probably more acid.