--
--
Visit our website: http://www.ciderworkshop.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "Cider Workshop" Google Group.
By joining the Cider Workshop, you agree to abide by our principles. Please see http://www.ciderworkshop.com/resources_principles.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cider Workshop" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cider-worksho...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cider-workshop/28c1c287-0d5d-4c56-b2ca-94a5456f7ed4n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cider-workshop/CAF%3DUv_OmhDZEPk78kNcLWxfD2-1dXEGLbQ90Q8%2Bj7fLjjt8YKA%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Jeff
I think your findings with European bottles and conclusions are pretty well supported by the distribution of failures in the Jo Morgan Teague PhD thesis that I mentioned. You might find a read of it worthwhile (apart from it being written way back when we had manual typewriters and became very excited when the first +-x/ calculators became affordable).
It is available via OhioLINK. I can’t find the search reference number that I had, but I can still get to it by Googling (Stress in Glass Bottles PhD thesis Teague)
I really haven’t been able to find anything more recent than this which covers bursting pressure for bottles. Having spent some time in the glass container industry back in the day, I can’t see much difference between the manufacturing technology described by Teague and that of more recent times. As far as I know, it is still a matter of heating and shaping Silica Sand, Soda Ash, Limestone and Cullet (recycled glass).
I also understand that stress builds up slowly in glass under pressure, and is relieved if the cause is removed (e.g. the pasteurising pressure drops as the bottles cool back to normal).
The Teague study was on bottles quite similar in shape and size to those commonly used today except that they had about 20% more glass. Having said that, the Teague bottle wall thickness was quite variable from <2mm to >4mm and it could well be that the thickness and hence strength of “modern” bottles is better controlled. Interestingly the study also covered “abused” as well as new bottles where the spread of failures was similar.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cider-workshop/051ce162-37ce-4d0d-a274-b1ec7ac82d0cn%40googlegroups.com.