The following may be of interest. They relate to a Churchill poem being sold at auction on which I was asked to comment.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/feb/06/winston-churchill-manuscript-poetic-side
-- Gregory B. Smith 154 W. Spain St., Villa T Sonoma, CA 95476 707 974-9324 Live dangerously, dread naught, all will be well. (W. S. Churchill)
Has anyone any idea who is the only woman (in the middle ground, above Churchill's cap) on the famous photograph of Churchill on
the east bank of the Rhine on 25 March 1945 :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Churchill_on_the_east_bank_of_the_Rhine.jpg
The Churchills: A Naval History published in Finest Hour No 110, Spring 2001 pp 26-7 details the service of HMS Churchill, ex USS Herndon, later USSR Dyeyatielnyi. The destroyers for bases agreement is dealt with in Fifty Ships that Saved the World: The Foundation of the Anglo-American Alliance by Philip Goodhart, 1965. The definitive work on the whole class of over 250 destroyers is Flush Decks and Four Pipes by John D Alden, 1965. In addition to Conway’s All the World’s Fighting Ships, those outside the US may have easier access to Jane’s Fighting Ships of World War II, foreword by Anthony Preston, 1989 which is a reprint of the 1946/7 edition of Jane’s supplemented by information from pre-war editions to cover the losses during the war.
Most opinions of the usefulness of the destroyers is less than positive. However, they did provide practical assistance at a critical time when no other resources were available. I have recently acquired a copy of Lend-Lease, Weapon for Victory by Edward R Stettinius, Jr, 1944 which provides a more positive contemporary view. Stettinius was appointed by Roosevelt as Commissioner for Industrial Materials , the position responsible for the implementation and administration of Lend-Lease until his appointment as Under Secretary of State late in 1943.
I have not come across any significant information about the role of the bases. The 99 year rights to bases in Newfoundland and Bermuda were “freely given” and strategically located for operations in the North Atlantic and thus make a direct contribution to the defence of the US. The rights to the Bahamas, Jamaica, St Lucia, Trinidad, Antigua and British Guiana were “traded.” These locations are more suited to operations in the Caribbean and in Latin America.
The greatest legacy of the agreement is the political climate this step provided between the “cash and carry” policy and the implementation of “Lend-Lease.”
Neil Coates
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChurchillChat" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to churchillcha...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to church...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Take care.
Brett Weiss
Chung & Press, LLC
V: 301.924.4400
F: 240.627.4186
E: br...@BankruptcyLawMaryland.com
W: www.BankruptcyLawMaryland.com
B: www.BankruptcyLawNetwork.com/author/bweiss
----------------------------------------------
Selected as a 2007 through 2013 Super Lawyer for Maryland and the District of Columbia
----------------------------------------------
Maryland, DC and Federal Bars
Maryland State Chair, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Founding Member, Bankruptcy Law Network
----------------------------------------------
The information transmitted in this message is intended to be privileged and confidential and for the use of only the recipient. Any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of the attorney-client or work-product privileges.
True, but it doesn’t make Senator Cruz a “terrorist”.
Best,
Quinn Bastian
The information contained in this communication is confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or unauthorized use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify the sender immediately and return the communication to sender.
Take care.
Brett Weiss
Chung & Press, LLC
V: 301.924.4400
F: 240.627.4186
E: br...@BankruptcyLawMaryland.com
W: www.BankruptcyLawMaryland.com
B: www.BankruptcyLawNetwork.com/author/bweiss
----------------------------------------------
Selected as a 2007 through 2013 Super Lawyer for Maryland and the District of Columbia
----------------------------------------------
Maryland, DC and Federal Bars
Maryland State Chair, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Founding Member, Bankruptcy Law Network
----------------------------------------------
The information transmitted in this message is intended to be privileged and confidential and for the use of only the recipient. Any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of the attorney-client or work-product privileges.
Pretty broad.
Webster’s definition: “the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion”
I do not believe that throwing around a word like “terrorist” because we don’t like a person’s approach is appropriate or helpful. WSC often used words to describe his opponents that were hardly complementary and that is part of the game but I don’t recall him throwing around the word “Nazi” very lightly . Also, due to the events of the last decade and the lives that are still being lost through the use of terror, it would be better if opponents were more sensitive to its use and chose to stick to their arguments rather than using a description that is unfitting. I realize this I may be naïve, but that does not invalidate my point.