EC Self-Eval assignment - due by end of period 4/30

[Ron W]

Reply to sender of this post - not to "all".  Due by the end of the period Monday April 30.

 

You do not need to repeat the questions, just the question number. Keep your answers to at most 2 sentences for each question. The easiest way to loose points on this self-eval is to leave a question blank or to answer "nothing".

 

1. what went well with this project?

2. what went well with this team?

3. what could have gone better with this project?

4. what could have gone better with this team?

5. What is one thing I could have done to make this a better experience for you?

 

6. If you had to choose today ... who woudl be your three team-mates from this class for next year's Symposium project?

 

7. if you had to choose today, what would be your Symposium project for next year?

[Rachel Greene]

1. On this project, we got our board done fairly quickly and then only had to worry about using the meter to test the resistance, voltage, and current of each circuit.

 

2. Our team worked well together and we didnt argue. We allowed eachother to try out our different ideas and did not make fun of eachother if their idea didnt work.

 

3. We could have understood how to work the meter more clearly so that we did not have to spend as much time working on it and the equations.

 

4. For our team, we could have designated the jobs a little bit better. For example, everyone focused on the building of the circuits and testing the resistance, voltage, and current.

 

5.This would have been a better experience for me if the way to use the meter was explained more clearly in the first place so that I wouldn't have had to spend as much time on learning it multiple times.

 

6. If I had to choose today, I would want my three teammates to be Caroline, Dahlia, and Esther.

 

7. If I had to choose today, my symposium project for next year would be solar energy related.

[Lizzy Nickerson]

1. Something that went well was that we were able to do the project quickly and well so it was an easy project.

2. The team worked well with each other and there were no arguements; we acted like a functional team.

3. I think there could have been more to it because it seemed too easy and we were done after the first day.

4. I think all members of the team could have helped, because while some were working others were off at other projects and not helping the people that were working to complete the task at hand.

5. I think a bit more dirrection would have been nice because there were some aspects that were confusing and the voltage thing was hard to figure out.

6. I would personally like a one or two man team but if I had to choose a bigger one, maybe Rio, Jon, and Esther. But to be honest, I don't really know who I would like on my team at this point in time.

7. I probably would choose the nitrogen removal project in aquiponics, my only concern would be how well it would actually work with chemistry. Not to mention if the team working with aquponics will let me test this is there is the possibility of hurting their fish.

[arya pathak]

1. what went well with this project?

We got all our work done efficiently and I learned about how to take
all of the measurements.
2. what went well with this team? We worked well together and we did
all of our jobs correctly.
3. what could have gone better with this project? We could have all
been explained about how to take measurements.
4. what could have gone better with this team? Better communication
about the measurements.

5. What is one thing I could have done to make this a better
experience for

you?  I think that it would have been good if we could have spent more
time learning about how to take measurements.

6. If you had to choose today ... who woudl be your three team-mates
from

this class for next year's Symposium project? Caroline Kealoha, Karina
Orasud, Sophie Shoemaker

7. if you had to choose today, what would be your Symposium project
for

next year?  Testing solar panels on buildings