The invisible web of relationships is what holds societies together. Peacebuilding can thus be thought of as rebuilding the relational spaces that hold things together and give people a sense of identity, direction, and purpose. A relationship-centered approach to peacebuilding emphasizes the 'who' rather than the 'how' of transcending conflict. It understands the human community in terms of the crisscrossing connections between people, their lives, activities, and patterns of conflict. Understanding things in this way requires appropriate lenses so that people can bring the web of relationships into focus. To understand existing social webs, we should examine both the web makers and the web watchers.
Unlike a linear change theory, the web approach emphasizes that multiple processes at different levels and social spaces should take place at the same time. It does not think in terms of "us" versus "them," but rather about how multiple sets of interdependent processes link people together and bring about social change. In settings of protracted conflict, movement away from fear and violence requires large numbers of people. However, it is important to note that it is not necessarily the amount of participants that sustain change processes. The focus on "numbers" has led to a misunderstanding and misapplication of the concept of critical mass.
There is something transcendent that takes place both in artistic endeavors and in authentic reconciliation. Like artistic processes, reconciliation is not linear. It proceeds in all kinds of unexpected ways, has its own sense of time, and is not chronological. Like a creative endeavor, reconciliation has its own inner timing and cannot be forced. It arises from the heart as much as from the head and is most effective when it expresses a message that is simple and honest. The knack for playfulness and for seeing the life inside of things is highly important. Ledearch recommends that peacebuilders begin to see themselves as artists who feel a sense of connection to what they create, love for what they do, and a desire to bring beauty to what they build. The work of peacebuilding and social change needs to move beyond analytical techniques and tap into people's more artistic selves.
Conflict transformation is accurate because the core of my work is indeed about engaging myself in constructive change initiatives that include and go beyond the resolution of particular problems. It is scientifically sound because the writing and research about conflict converge in two common ideas: conflict is normal in human relationships and conflict is a motor of change. And transformation is clear in vision because it brings into focus the horizon toward which we journey, namely the building of healthy relationships and communities, both locally and globally. This process requires significant changes in our current ways of relating.
However, the transformational approach addresses this situation somewhat differently. This is because conflict transformation is more than a set of specific techniques. It is about a way of looking and seeing, and it provides a set of lenses through which we make sense of social conflict. These lenses draw our attention to certain aspects of conflict, and help us to bring the overall meaning of the conflict into sharper focus.
Before proceeding further, I should describe what I mean by a lens as a transformational tool. I recently purchased a set of glasses that have what are called progressive lenses. This means that in my eyeglasses I have three different lens types in the same frame. One lens helps bring into focus things at a great distance that would otherwise be a blur. A second brings objects that are at mid-range into a clear picture. The third helps me read a book or thread a fish line through a hook.
It is interesting to note three things about my new glasses and how they relate to a transformational view. First, if I try to use the close-up lens to see at a distance, the lens is counterproductive and useless. Each lens has its function and serves to bring a specific aspect of reality into focus. But when it brings that layer of reality in focus, other layers are placed in a blur. If you look through a camera with a telephoto lens or through a microscope at a slide of bacteria you can find this happening in dramatic fashion.
Second, no one lens is capable of bringing everything into focus. Rather, I need multiple lenses to see different aspects of a complex reality, and cannot rely exclusively on one lens to see the multiple layers of complexity.
The Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) consortium is a group of federal agencies who coordinate and generate consistent and relevant land cover information at the national scale for a wide variety of environmental, land management, and modeling applications. The creation of this consortium has resulted in the mapping of the lower 48 United States, Hawaii, Alaska and Puerto Rico into a comprehensive land cover product termed, the National Land Cover Database (NLCD), from decadal Landsat satellite imagery and other supplementary datasets.
Too often we can reduce both the challenge and opportunities of such a move into simplistic implementation steps and a more linear, technical view of change. I hope that this series helps you and your colleagues to dig deeply into the shifts needed, not just to change a transcript, but to transform learning.
Note.Content developers should only resort to alternativepages when other solutions fail because alternative pagesare generally updated less often than "primary" pages. An out-of-datepage may be as frustrating as one that is inaccessible since, in bothcases, the information presented on the original page isunavailable. Automatically generating alternative pages may lead tomore frequent updates, but content developersmust still be careful to ensurethat generated pages always make sense, and that users are able tonavigate a site by following links on primary pages, alternativepages, or both. Before resorting to an alternative page,reconsider the design of the original page; making itaccessible is likely to improve it for all users.Guideline 12. Provide context and orientation information. Provide context and orientation information to help usersunderstand complex pages or elements.Grouping elements and providing contextual information about therelationships between elements can be useful for allusers. Complex relationships between parts of a page maybe difficult for people with cognitive disabilitiesand people with visual disabilities to interpret. Checkpoints:12.1 Title each frame to facilitate frame identification and navigation. [Priority 1]For example, in HTML use the "title" attribute on FRAMEelements.Techniques for checkpoint 12.112.2 Describe the purpose of frames and how frames relate to each other if it is not obvious by frame titles alone. [Priority 2]For example, in HTML, use "longdesc," or adescription link.Techniques for checkpoint 12.212.3 Divide large blocks of information into more manageable groups where natural and appropriate. [Priority 2]For example, in HTML, use OPTGROUPto group OPTION elements inside a SELECT;group form controls with FIELDSET and LEGEND;use nested lists where appropriate;use headings to structure documents, etc.Refer also to guideline 3.Techniques for checkpoint 12.312.4 Associate labels explicitly with their controls. [Priority 2]For example, in HTML use LABEL and its "for" attribute.Techniques for checkpoint 12.4Guideline 13. Provide clear navigation mechanisms. Provide clear and consistent navigation mechanisms --orientation information, navigation bars, a site map, etc. -- toincrease the likelihood that a person will find what they are lookingfor at a site.Clear and consistent navigationmechanisms are important to people with cognitivedisabilities or blindness, and benefit all users. Checkpoints:13.1 Clearly identify the target of each link. [Priority 2]Linktext should be meaningful enoughto make sense when read out of context --either on its own or as part of a sequence of links.Link text should also be terse.For example, in HTML, write "Information aboutversion 4.3" instead of "click here".In addition to clear link text, content developers mayfurther clarify the target of a linkwith an informative link title(e.g., in HTML, the "title" attribute).Techniques for checkpoint 13.113.2 Provide metadata to add semantic information to pages and sites. [Priority 2]For example, useRDF([RDF])to indicate the document's author,the type of content, etc.Note. Some HTML user agentscan build navigation tools from document relations described bythe HTML LINK element and "rel" or "rev" attributes(e.g., rel="next", rel="previous", rel="index", etc.).Refer also to checkpoint 13.5.Techniques for checkpoint 13.213.3 Provide information about the general layout of a site (e.g., a site map or table of contents). [Priority 2]In describing site layout,highlight and explain available accessibility features.Techniques for checkpoint 13.313.4 Use navigation mechanisms in a consistent manner. [Priority 2]Techniques for checkpoint 13.413.5 Provide navigation bars to highlight and give access to the navigation mechanism. [Priority 3]Techniques for checkpoint 13.513.6 Group related links, identify the group (for user agents), and, until user agents do so, provide a way to bypass the group. [Priority 3]Techniques for checkpoint 13.613.7 If search functions are provided, enable different types of searches for different skill levels and preferences. [Priority 3]Techniques for checkpoint 13.713.8 Place distinguishing information at the beginning of headings, paragraphs, lists, etc. [Priority 3]Note.This is commonly referred to as "front-loading" and isespecially helpful for people accessing information with serialdevices such as speech synthesizers.Techniques for checkpoint 13.813.9 Provide information about document collections (i.e., documents comprising multiple pages.). [Priority 3]For example, in HTMLspecify document collections with the LINKelement and the "rel" and "rev" attributes.Another way to create a collection is by buildingan archive (e.g., with zip, tar and gzip, stuffit, etc.)of the multiple pages.Note.The performance improvement gained by offlineprocessing can make browsing much lessexpensive for people with disabilities who maybe browsing slowly.Techniques for checkpoint 13.913.10 Provide a means to skip over multi-line ASCII art. [Priority 3]Refer to checkpoint 1.1 and the example of ascii artin the glossary.Techniques for checkpoint 13.10Guideline 14. Ensure that documentsare clear and simple. Ensure that documents are clear and simple sothey may be more easily understood.Consistent page layout, recognizable graphics, and easy to understandlanguage benefit all users. In particular, they helppeople with cognitive disabilities or whohave difficulty reading. (However, ensure that imageshave text equivalents for people who are blind, havelow vision, or for any user who cannot or haschosen not to view graphics. Refer also to guideline 1.)Using clear and simple language promotes effectivecommunication. Access to written information can be difficult forpeople who have cognitive or learning disabilities. Using clear andsimple language also benefits people whose first language differs fromyour own, including those people who communicate primarily in signlanguage. Checkpoints:14.1 Use the clearest and simplest language appropriate for a site's content. [Priority 1]Techniques for checkpoint 14.114.2 Supplement text with graphic or auditory presentations where they will facilitate comprehension of the page. [Priority 3]Refer also to guideline 1.Techniques for checkpoint 14.214.3 Create a style of presentation that is consistent across pages. [Priority 3]Techniques for checkpoint 14.3 Appendix A. -- ValidationValidate accessibility with automatic tools and humanreview. Automated methods are generally rapid and convenient but cannotidentify all accessibility issues. Human review can help ensureclarity of language and ease of navigation.Begin using validation methods at the earliest stages ofdevelopment. Accessibility issues identified early are easier tocorrect and avoid.Following are some important validation methods, discussed in moredetail in the sectionon validation in the Techniques Document.