Is there a freeware of this tool to ID? I tried Terminal's file command
on a doc file (changed the names):
"test.doc: CDF V2 Document, Little Endian, Os: Windows, Version 4.10,
Code page: 1252, Title: ?鸨?j?D?D?P????, Author: First Last, Template:
Normal.dot, Last Saved By: First Last, Revision Number: 6, Name of
Creating Application: Microsoft Word 9.0, Total Editing Time: 06:00,
Last Printed: Mon Jul 31 04:43:00 2000, Create Time/Date: Sun Sep 17
05:07:00 2000, Last Saved Time/Date: Sun Sep 17 05:13:00 2000, Number of
Pages: 1, Number of Words: 602, Number of Characters: 3437, Security: 0"
I hope that helps for clues?
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 08:53:28AM +0800, Henry Leperlier 羅維文 wrote:
> The trial version of Wenlin lets you do this as well by dropping the file onto its icon.
>
> It lets then you see different encodings and allow you to see which encoding your file has.
>
> Henry Leperlier
>
>
> On 24 Mar 2013, at 08:39, John Delacour <
johnde...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 23/03/2013 21:44, Ant wrote:
> >
> >> Is there a way to use old Chinese TTF files (also, where to get them?)
> >> from old Windows (98 SE, 2000, and XP) in Mac OS X (e.g., 10.5.8 and
> >> 10.8.3)?
> > If you can save the documents as plain text documents on the original system then there is no problem. It is not the fonts (which you can forget) that you are concerned with but the obsolete character sets, ie. big5 for traditional Chinese and gb-2312 for simplified. The documents need to be converted to Unicode UTF-8.
> >
> > If you have an old text document written in big5 encoding, you can open it in TextWrangler or BBEdit specifying this encoding and it will display correctly. You can then change the encoding to UTF-8 and save it. After that it can be opened in any text editor or word processor and the (Unicode) fonts and formatting changed to what you want.
> >
> > The word processor Nisus Writer will allow you to choose the encoding of documents you open but whether it will open such documents as you are talking of and preserve formatting I rather doubt.