Scott,
apologies for the late answer, your email went into my spam folder...
Thank you for spotting the problems.
I had a quick look and it seems my mistake in not defining the temperatures
of the spline nodes internally if nothing is given as input.
You are right about the default abundance file which changed in v.10.1
I always run the routine with a minimum and max temperature range
and a few spline nodes, and often with a range of max and min DEM values,
otherwise MPFIT usually fails.
I've tried
chianti_dem, file_input='input',output='test',dens=1e6
and reproduced your errors.
If you try this
chianti_dem, file_input='input',output='test',$
file_gt='test.contributions',$
spl_logt=[4.2,4.4,4.8,5.0,5.2,5.5,5.7],$
min_logt = 4.2, max_logt = 5.7
you get an answer.
However, it would not be realistic, mainly because
- neutral lines are very much wrong with the current CHIANTI version, even if they are optically thin.
- many lines you have are from anomalous ions, so their EM is wrong; indeed if you plot the EM loci you can see it yourself.
We (me and Roger Dufresne) are in the process of including in CHIANTI more physical processes (mainly density and charge transfer) which improve 2), see e.g. our papers in the past few years. It may take just a few weeks/months to have a
new version released.
In the mean time you could experiment with the improved ionization equilibria we have
produced.
For 1) we'll need to include photo-ionisation which will take some more time.
Giulio