Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What happened to Diann Burns?

213 views
Skip to first unread message

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Feb 28, 2003, 7:56:29 PM2/28/03
to
Jed Taylor <easy...@offthedial.com> wrote:

>In other words, you don't have the slightest idea beyond what's been
>published.

Don't top post, you git.

>Thanks for the brilliant insight and taking the time to share it.

Well, I have it on good authority... Why the hell should I tell you?

>On Sat, 01 Mar 2003 00:19:36 GMT, Mr. Crabbypants
><crabbyremo...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
>>Jed Taylor <easy...@offthedial.com> wrote:
>>
>>>So what's the real story with Diann Burns being told not to show up
>>>for work anymore?
>>
>>Do they have newspapers where you live? It's been reported in both
>>the Trib and the Sun Times.
>>
>>She decided she wanted to test the waters of free agency and not sign
>>an early renewal of her contract.
>>
>>So they decided to dump her.
>>
>


Sdrahcir

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 8:05:03 AM3/1/03
to
Who cares? I never watched her anyway.

"Jed Taylor" <easy...@offthedial.com> wrote in message
news:ebkv5vsa44qjbhpba...@4ax.com...


> So what's the real story with Diann Burns being told not to show up
> for work anymore?
>

> It's hard to believe any station is so stupid that it keeps the
> insufferable Cheryl Burton around and lets Diann Burns go.


Sdrahcir

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 8:08:32 AM3/1/03
to
WBBM-TV will offer her more $$$$$.
What else do you need to know?

"Jed Taylor" <easy...@offthedial.com> wrote in message

news:amsv5v0jq1t2ta24n...@4ax.com...


> In other words, you don't have the slightest idea beyond what's been
> published.
>

> Thanks for the brilliant insight and taking the time to share it.
>
>

> On Sat, 01 Mar 2003 00:19:36 GMT, Mr. Crabbypants
> <crabbyremo...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>
> >Jed Taylor <easy...@offthedial.com> wrote:
> >

> >>So what's the real story with Diann Burns being told not to show up
> >>for work anymore?
> >

Dave Moorman

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 9:08:45 AM3/1/03
to
In article <Kf28a.308194$Ec4.3...@rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net>,
"Sdrahcir" <Sdra...@attbi.com> wrote:

> WBBM-TV will offer her more $$$$$.
> What else do you need to know?

It's very nasty that they didn't allow her a dignified farewell to
coworkers and audience. Bizarre. Something that bizarre usually has
some sort of motivation, but it could just be a case of total
cluelessness on the part of the management.

Dave

Gregory Morrow

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 11:56:59 AM3/1/03
to

Dave Moorman wrote:

It's standard practice that when someone "gets the hook" in broadcasting,
they are not allowed to say "goodbye"......

--
Best
Greg

>
> Dave


Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 12:08:52 PM3/1/03
to
Dave Moorman <dmoo...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote:

>It's very nasty that [WLS-TV news] didn't allow [Diann Burns] a dignified


>farewell to coworkers and audience. Bizarre.

Linda McClennon had a tearful farewell Wednesday with her family on stage;
not sure how dignified it was.

paperw8

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 12:53:10 PM3/1/03
to
Gregory Morrow wrote:

> Dave Moorman wrote:
>
> > It's very nasty that they didn't allow her a dignified farewell to
> > coworkers and audience. Bizarre. Something that bizarre usually has
> > some sort of motivation, but it could just be a case of total
> > cluelessness on the part of the management.
>
> It's standard practice that when someone "gets the hook" in broadcasting,
> they are not allowed to say "goodbye"......
>

right, because she could turn up new month on a competing station.
the "goodbye" stuff is usually only done when a person is retiring,
or leaving for another market. i found out about diann burns getting
sacked when she was on wvaz-fm on friday afternoon talking about it.
as i understand it, she found out about it from reading the newspaper.
that part of it did strike me as being pretty low class.

paperw8

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 12:59:33 PM3/1/03
to
"Mr. Crabbypants" wrote:

> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.chinet.com> wrote:
>
> >Linda McClennon had a tearful farewell Wednesday with her family on stage;
> >not sure how dignified it was.
>
> Had she just finished chowing down on some fried chicken, or was the
> buffet for afterwards?
>

it seems as though she really let herself go after she hit 40. it's
kind of interesting because when she turned 40, she did a series called
"40 fit and fabulous" or some such. clearly she was trying to deal
with the difficulties that she was experiencing in coming to terms with
middle age. there was a period of about 5 or 6 years where i wasn't
watching television but when i saw her recently she looked like she
had really packed on the weight. i think that she is around 47 or 48
now so i would attribute the weight gain more to stress than age.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 4:06:38 PM3/1/03
to
Mr. Crabbypants <crabbyremo...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.chinet.com> wrote:

>>Linda McClennon had a tearful farewell Wednesday with her family on stage;
>>not sure how dignified it was.

>Had she just finished chowing down on some fried chicken, or was the
>buffet for afterwards?

Fried chicken makes YOU cry?

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Mar 1, 2003, 4:10:41 PM3/1/03
to
pap...@mindspring.com wrote:

>it seems as though she really let herself go after she hit 40.

Post a naked picture of yourself, or shut the fuck up.

Geoff Gass

unread,
Mar 2, 2003, 11:24:06 AM3/2/03
to
Mr Crabbypants <crabbyremo...@ameritech.net> wrote:
> "... and disappointed I didn't get the opportunity to say `thank you'
> to the people of Chicago who have made me part of their families."
>
> Watching the news is making someone part of the family??
>
> Sounds kind delusional to me.

Sounds like your average local newscaster who wants the audience to move
with her when she gets a job at another station.

Geoff Gass

unread,
Mar 2, 2003, 11:25:39 AM3/2/03
to
Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.chinet.com> wrote:
> Mr. Crabbypants <crabbyremo...@ameritech.net> wrote:
>>"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.chinet.com> wrote:
>
>>>Linda McClennon had a tearful farewell Wednesday with her family on stage;
>>>not sure how dignified it was.
>
>>Had she just finished chowing down on some fried chicken, or was the
>>buffet for afterwards?
>
> Fried chicken makes YOU cry?

That must be some really good fried chicken.

Dave Moorman

unread,
Mar 4, 2003, 6:46:36 PM3/4/03
to
In article <v61q94k...@corp.supernews.com>,

"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.chinet.com> wrote:

> Linda McClennon had a tearful farewell Wednesday with her family on stage;
> not sure how dignified it was.

Sounds like it was real. Better real than dignified.

Dave

Dave Moorman

unread,
Mar 4, 2003, 6:48:57 PM3/4/03
to
In article <vD58a.5979$Uy4.5...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Gregory Morrow" <grege...@att.net> wrote:

Standard practice or no, it's still crude.

Dave

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Mar 5, 2003, 1:14:16 AM3/5/03
to
Dave Moorman <dmoo...@NOSPAMattbi.com> wrote:
>"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.chinet.com> wrote:

>>Linda McClennon had a tearful farewell Wednesday with her family on stage;
>>not sure how dignified it was.

>Sounds like it was real. Better real than dignified.

Quite. Tee Vee.

Robert John

unread,
Mar 6, 2003, 10:03:03 AM3/6/03
to
Glad the leftist is gone. Almost anyone can read a teleprompter for no more
then 30K per year.


EyeonMedia

unread,
Mar 7, 2003, 10:02:29 AM3/7/03
to
<<Almost anyone can read a teleprompter for no more
then 30K per year.<<

What a brilliant observation.

Of course, reading is the easy part. The hard part, the part they actually pay
you for, is getting other people to watch you read the teleprompter.

BJ

unread,
Apr 2, 2003, 1:40:23 PM4/2/03
to
I don't care who spends 6 minutes per newscast to read a teleprompter. I'm
interested in the news. Most anyone could do her job for 30K per year.
BJ


John Simmons

unread,
Apr 2, 2003, 6:00:52 PM4/2/03
to
BJ wrote:

> I don't care who spends 6 minutes per newscast to read a teleprompter. I'm
> interested in the news.

You've got a lot of people like myself that agree with you. Feder even
printed a few letters that made this same point not to long ago.

> Most anyone could do her job for 30K per year.
> BJ

I could do it for less. But let's not mislead anyone who thinks she only
makes $30,000 a year. She probably makes that amount every day.


0 new messages