~SEAN HANNITY? house painter,and electrician? LMAO
ex_cathedra
"Hannitizer" LMAO !
I was listening to WLS last night (the only intelligent show on the
entire WLS 890AM lineup) Nate Clay
And found out that Hannity's political accomplishments were his
electricians license in 1986,and was a house painter before becoming
the supreme authority on who is and who isn't a conservative.
I heard a commercial for Common-Tater Sean Hannity(or should we call
him Sean Handyman LOL) while listeng to WLS where Sean Handyman says
Kerry isn't qualified to be President.
Not that I want Kerry,but in my opinion Sean Hannity isn't qualified
to be a political pundint in prime time radio time.
If you look at Nate Clay's resume on WLS's webpage you have to wonder
why a guy like Nate Clay is subjugated to a Saturday night/early
Sunday betwee like 12 and 3 am with his stunning resume,and
demonsrtrable languge skills ,and an uneducated imbecile like Hannity
it becomes apparent Hannity is there to collect the idiots of the
country into one stupified bundle.
Like attracts like,and Hannity isn't educated or qualified to discuss
anything political.
What a dunce.
I would like to see Nate Clay and Sean Shammity do a little Trading
Places .
Like in the movie with Eddie Murphy and Dan Akkroyd.
Nate Clay actually has a past that leaves him qualified to make
commentary and base sound opinion on.
If I want a house painters opinion or an electricians opinion on
global events I'll ask them when I hire them to tidy up or repair my
house.
Vader
"ex_cathedra" <excat...@eboxmail.net> wrote in message
news:a1928239.04103...@posting.google.com...
> How about that the hotshot "political" common-tater Hannity the
> "Hannitizer" LMAO !
>
Hannity and his ilk thrive off of attacks and confrontations with who they
percive to be "liberal".
That's what pulls in the ratings for them. Right-wingers listen to them, and
agree with every word they espouse, and the left listen in to provide the
outrage and conflict via hate mail and phone calls.
And electrician and house painter? Huh.
What a scam he's wrought.
Ian S
> "Hannitizer" LMAO !
>
> I was listening to WLS last night (the only intelligent show on the
> entire WLS 890AM lineup) Nate Clay
> And found out that Hannity's political accomplishments were his
> electricians license in 1986,and was a house painter
Hannity reminds me of the male half of the idiotic housepainter team - Alf
and Ralph - on "Green Acres" except Alf was brighter.
big benz
>
> How about that the hotshot "political" common-tater Hannity the
> "Hannitizer" LMAO !
>
hannity is a fraud and is little more than a rush limbaugh ripoff act.
emulating limbaugh is the way to get ratings because it appeals to the
worst instincts in people.
--
the ball was in!
Eris
wrote:
I also listen to WLS and have for most of my life. I return to this
area after living out of the WLS listening area for 25 years.
What happened? There talent was the highest when I left. Uncle Larry
and little snot nosed Tommy were hilarious.
Now I have to listen to Don and Roma yelling about the things that
Kerry should not be allowed to say. And that young snotty white chick
and the snotty black chick. They both sound like they were discovered
in a domestic violence shelter. Most of the talent seems to be found
in rehab centers. Yet I still listen and hope.
Is it my imagination or did Roe or Row become more right wing after
Gary left?
Where is Gary?
What is a Rev. Jim
Arthur T. Raymond
excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra) wrote:
> I was listening to Nate Clay on WLS last night (the only
> intelligent show on the entire WLS 890AM lineup), and
> found out that Hannity's political accomplishments
> were his electrician's license in 1986, and house painter
> before becoming the supreme authority on who is and
> who isn't a conservative.
> If you look at Nate Clay's resume on WLS's webpage
> you have to wonder why a guy like Clay is subjugated
> to a Saturday night/early Sunday between 12 and
> 3 am...
It's because Hannity draws ad bucks, and Clay -- God bless him for
coveting his paycheck-- allows WLS to use him as their Affirmative Action
lapdog (i.e. they put him on the air when most of Chicgao is fast asleep).
WLS has become a cesspool of neo-con hatred. Bad enough they carry Rush,
Hannity, Elder, Drudge and Snow on a syndicated feed, but even their local
personalities (save Clay, Jay Marvin and in most cases, Roe Conn) have
become unbearably biased.
1) What the hell crawled up Deborah "Affirmative Action" Rowe's ample rear
end and laid eggs? She used to present a fairly balanced political view
(albeit in a very amateurish fashion). But for the past year or so, she's
become a ranting cheerleader for the neo-cons. Methinks WLS's PD gave her
an ultimatum.. "conform or pack your bags."
Regardless, she's an indisputable digrace to Chicago, to women, and to
African Americans at large. A sellout. A "take the money & run" hack.
Hey Debbie -- if you're listening: look up the word "Bomba" (as it relates
to the the Virgin Island rum, sugar and slave trade).
If the shoe fits, "sister".
2) Much the same re Eileen Byrne... I remember her as a (fairly)
intelligent and well-spoken independent. Now, she spends her mid-morning
slot spewing carefully-scripted GOP vitriol, while her august co-host, Jay
Marvin, does his best not to reach over the table and wring her ignorant,
anorexic little throat.
Jay, brother -- send out your resume, man... there's a station out there
somewhere that wil hire you for your fair & honest viewpoint, and who
won't sell off your (or your dear wife Mary's) commercial endorsements
like some sort of circus clown. Shoe store and mattresses are beneath your
level of logic, politcal savvy and intellect.
3) The biggest insult -- by far -- is this Terri O'Brien "person" -- the
most spitefully venemous, fascist bag of middle-aged, dyed-hair ill wind
this side of the Aryan Nation. WLS has replaced what was already a fairly
repugnant morning pair (i.e. Don Wade & "Coma") with O'Brien, teaming her
with a sophomoric sockpuppet sidekick named Art Wallace; a man with
absolutely no opinions of his own; a snivelling, cowardly little yes-man
who is clearly thanking his lucky stars -- every day -- that he's even
getting a paycheck.
I've listened to -- and loved -- talk radio for 20 years. And I know that
when the very best of a radio station's lineup is Dr. Dean Edell (again,
relegated to a slot when no one is listening). they've pretty much sunken
to the lowest possible level of broadcast professionalism.
It's wonder WLS can draw even one respectable advertiser. They're a disgrace.
hol99
I would like to see Hannity debate practically anyone, where it isn't a
format that he can shout over the top of them. I don't care what his
politics are, he makes me sick. I wish they would get rid of Colmes and put
someone on with him that wouldn't take his shit. I think Bill Maher would be
good on that show.
Dave
hol99
"Arthur T. Raymond" <JusticeI...@Yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:JusticeIsSwerved...@c-24-12-208-240.client.comcast.net...
>
> I've listened to -- and loved -- talk radio for 20 years. And I know that
> when the very best of a radio station's lineup is Dr. Dean Edell (again,
> relegated to a slot when no one is listening). they've pretty much sunken
> to the lowest possible level of broadcast professionalism.
>
> It's wonder WLS can draw even one respectable advertiser. They're a
> disgrace.
I hear you. I live in Nevada and it's the same thing. Limbaugh, Hannity, Dr.
Laura, Savage (real name: Weiner), Michael Reagan, Drudge, O'Reilly, all
Rush and his clones, 24 hours a day. There is hope, though. Lately they've
started airing Colmes, who I think is a pansy, but at least they will take
all calls, unlike the carefully scripted stepford people Right wingers. And
also someone named Ed Shultz. The backlash has just begun.
Dave
Norma
"big benz" <big...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:418586E6...@mindspring.com...
I can't stand him, and I wonder why FOX keeps him around on prime time? If
they are so "fair and balanced", it certainly doesn't show. But why is his
partner, Alan Colmes around--he isn't able to banter or present another side
with any enthusiasm. It is the strangest arrangement I have ever seen.
Hannity sounds and looks like a bully most of the time. Norma
hol99
"Norma" <norm...@charter.net> wrote in message
news:10ob8sf...@corp.supernews.com...
Colmes is part of the design. Put an agressive bully up against someone that
won't fight back. Fox would never put up anyone that was a match for
Hannity, like maybe Bill Maher. Someone that could shout as loud as he
could. I had never even heard of this human skeleton, Colmes, until that
show came out. Ailes must've searched pretty hard to find someone that weak.
But Hannity is just another right wing punk, like Limbaugh. I'd like to meet
him someone face to face, just me and him, and see how much of a badass he
is. I'll bet you he'd piss on himself if someone confronted him.
Dave
Spammeister
for the right who's always well prepared with ambushes to trip up the
guests on the left. My problem with his show is Fox simulates real
debate by offering up knock down liberal co-moderator Alan Colmes whose
sole role appears to be to get his ass routinely handed to him on a
plate. I've never seen Colmes win an argument. Not once. Worse, much of
the time he doesn't even offer a response. He just sits there like a
lump with a vacant look on his face. So the poor liberal guests
routinely get stuck facing a tag-team of Hannity and some conservative
guest while Colmes sits on the sidelines. Conservative guests get a buy
with Colmes tossing out some anemic softball questions while Hannity
swaps spit with them when Colmes is done going through the motions.
Of course, that's how "fair and balanced" Fox wants it because it
marketing niche is conservatives.
--
"Stupidity's the deliberate cultivation of ignorance."
-- William Gladdis
Tired of junk email??? Fight back! Visit http://www.craigbanks.us.
big benz
>
> I can't stand him, and I wonder why FOX keeps him around on prime time? If
> they are so "fair and balanced", it certainly doesn't show.
>
the repeated statement about fox news being "fair and balanced" is a
joke - they don't try to be any such thing.
The Real Diddy Pop
Oh boy, another tough guy on the internet. Please spare us, your
analysis of Hannity/Colmes was already bad enough, but on top of that,
you're trying to act tough. HAHAHAH!!!!!
trotsky
JusticeIsSwerved...@c-24-12-208-240.client.comcast.net, Arthur
T. Raymond at JusticeI...@Yahoo.com wrote on 10/31/04 7:53 PM:
> In article <a1928239.04103...@posting.google.com>,
> excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra) wrote:
>
>> I was listening to Nate Clay on WLS last night (the only
>> intelligent show on the entire WLS 890AM lineup), and
>> found out that Hannity's political accomplishments
>> were his electrician's license in 1986, and house painter
>> before becoming the supreme authority on who is and
>> who isn't a conservative.
>
>> If you look at Nate Clay's resume on WLS's webpage
>> you have to wonder why a guy like Clay is subjugated
>> to a Saturday night/early Sunday between 12 and
>> 3 am...
>
> It's because Hannity draws ad bucks, and Clay -- God bless him for
> coveting his paycheck-- allows WLS to use him as their Affirmative Action
> lapdog (i.e. they put him on the air when most of Chicgao is fast asleep).
Hannity has some catching up to do: Rush has his drug addiction, O'Reilly
has his dirtbag activities, I figure Hannity should be convicted of murder
to keep in the running. At the very least he should be made to broadcast
from a tub of feces to keep the playing field level.
Jim Alder
Some revealing crap. Not about Hannity, but about him.
Apparently having a normal manual labor job in the past disqualifies
them to have an opinion in the present or the future. One must go right
from the cradle to one's present job.
I guess this shows why they feel so strongly about people like Kerry and
Clinton, who never had any job other than political. People who actually
work for a living are to be looked down on with scorn. They're only good
for votes.
--
Kerry claims Republicans disenfranchised 1 million black voters in Florida
in 2000, but neglects to mention that after extensive and expensive
hearings, the U.S. Civil Rights Commission failed to name a single one of
them. Can you name just one out of that "million," Sen. Kerry? We've found
more WMDs in Iraq than we've found disenfranchised blacks in Florida.
Indeed - to the contrary! - in 2000, blacks composed 11 percent of
registered voters in Florida, but made up 17 percent of those who actually
voted. If that's how Republicans "suppress" the black vote, blacks are
better off when Republicans attack them than when Democrats pretend to be
nice to them. - Ann Coulter
hol99
"The Real Diddy Pop" <cj...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:95cdfe04.0411...@posting.google.com...
> "hol99" <no...@youknow.com> wrote in message
> news:<HAhhd.72640$bk1.14137@fed1read05>...
>> "Norma" <norm...@charter.net> wrote in message
>> news:10ob8sf...@corp.supernews.com...
>
> analysis of Hannity/Colmes was already bad enough, but on top of that,
> you're trying to act tough. HAHAHAH!!!!!
No worse than him being rude and disrespectful to anyone on that show that
disagrees with him. I'll bet he has tons of security to back up that big
mouth.
And I guarantee you I can take him! :)
Dave
tcg
"trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
news:BDABAC47.125D7%gms...@email.com...
| in article
| JusticeIsSwerved...@c-24-12-208-240.client.comcast.net,
Arthur
| T. Raymond at JusticeI...@Yahoo.com wrote on 10/31/04 7:53 PM:
|
| > In article <a1928239.04103...@posting.google.com>,
| > excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra) wrote:
| >
| >> intelligent show on the entire WLS 890AM
<snip>
Isn't that an oxymoron?
glugg
> How about that the hotshot "political" common-tater Hannity the
> "Hannitizer" LMAO !
>
> I was listening to WLS last night (the only intelligent show on the
> entire WLS 890AM lineup) Nate Clay
> And found out that Hannity's political accomplishments were his
> electricians license in 1986,and was a house painter before becoming
> the supreme authority on who is and who isn't a conservative.
He is merely a non-elected political commentator.
You might consider losing the elitist view that a working man
should for some reason be banned from such a position.
But this opinion of yours brings up a strange conclusion.
If a house painter is unqualified to have an opinion worthy
of mention then should house painters be banned from voteing?
Transition Zone
> "Hannitizer" LMAO !
>
> I was listening to WLS last night (the only intelligent show on the
> entire WLS 890AM lineup) Nate Clay
> And found out that Hannity's political accomplishments were his
> electricians license in 1986,and was a house painter before becoming
> the supreme authority on who is and who isn't a conservative.
You don't need credentials to engage in name-calling and shouting
down facts - which is all any republican does.
Mark Anderson
> I would like to see Hannity debate practically anyone, where it isn't a
> format that he can shout over the top of them. I don't care what his
> politics are, he makes me sick. I wish they would get rid of Colmes and put
> someone on with him that wouldn't take his shit. I think Bill Maher would be
> good on that show.
Bill Maher's schtick is antithetical to the right wing/left wing talking
point spin blather shows such as Hannity/Colmes and Crossfire. Maher is
no more a "liberal" (whatever that is) than he is a "conservative" (a
label that has significantly changed meaning in the last few decades).
Maher is far more quick with the wit than Hannity who has problems when
it comes to thinking outside of the assigned talking points. Hannity is
like the dumb drunk obnoxious bloke you have the unfortune of accidently
sitting next to. Maher is a person who will insult you but you won't
realize it until the next morning when nursing your hangover.
Mark Anderson
> Is it my imagination or did Roe or Row become more right wing after
> Gary left?
I don't think Garry liked getting into political discussions. Politics
tends to take the humor out of a talk show and the Roe and Garry show was
an island of entertainment sandwiched between a cesspool of right wing
hate radio. Ever since Garry left Roe has spent more time on politics.
I suspect that he may have been required to dedicate a certain amount of
segments per week to carrying Republican water before the election.
Today it was all politics and his first 5 calls, before I changed
channels, were 4 Republicans and 1 "independent" voter. The so called
"independent" voter slipped near the end of the call and mentioned
something she heard on the Rush Limbaugh show.
> Where is Gary?
Good question.
ex_cathedra
Well...the stupid ones for sure.
Stupid People Love Bush New Study Shows Correlation Between Decline Of
IQ And Rise Of GOP
Stupid People Love Bush
New Study Shows Correlation Between
Decline Of IQ And Rise Of GOP
By Will Durst
10-30-4
"Stupid people love Bush" new study proves According to the
prestigious Southern California think tank, The Gluton Group, stupid
people prefer President George W Bush over Senator John Kerry by a
4-to-1 margin. As Chief Resident Dr. Louis Friend characterized the
results of the research, "the less intelligent you are, the more you
like Bush." This landmark study, conducted over a 5 month period,
involved 2400 likely voters bridging all economic stratas in the 17
states generally considered up for grabs on November 2nd. Participants
were tested for intelligence, then asked to fill out a 12 page series
of questions involving the Presidential candidates with results
released earlier this week.
The consensus: the higher the IQ, the less people trust Bush and
respect the job his administration has done. The lower the IQ, the
more people admire his steadfastness. "It was pretty much a slam dunk.
There's no nice way to say this. Dumb people like him. They think his
unwavering nature is a positive personality trait. They even venerate
him for never admitting mistakes, even when he's wrong. On the other
hand, smart people think he's a lying bully. I mean, c'mon, you have a
deserter accusing a decorated veteran of treason. Who's going to buy
that besides stupid people?"
Preliminary results:
IQ Above 140: Kerry 80%, Bush 20%.
120-140: Kerry 65%, Bush 35%.
100-120: Kerry 54%, Bush 46%.
80-100: Bush 54%, Kerry 46%.
60-80: Bush 60%, Kerry 15%, Dale Earnhardt Jr. 25%.
Apparently, Bush's good-evil, black-white philosophy resonates on an
inverse relationship with higher education, whereas it became evident
over the period of analysis that John Kerry's nuanced arguments are
only understood by people who paid attention in any class above the
5th grade.
Doctor Friend elaborated: "It has to do with intellectual curiosity.
Folks see Bush in front of a stream talking about the environment and
they assume he's in favor of it, even though if you read his
legislation, I'd be surprised to hear him endorse shade. This also
explains why Bush gets away with pretending he doesn't know how the
Senate works, allowing him to call Kerry a flip-flopper."
Friend released evidence that this type of disconnect exists across
the board: education, foreign policy, the economy, post 9-11 security
response and State Dinner entertainment choices. Also discovered was a
direct correlation between the number of preset Country Western
stations on car radios and Bush's approval rating. Dr. Friend
attributes this phenomena to the simplicity inherent in the messages
indigenous to both. Classical music listeners were preponderantly
Kerry supporters, but surprisingly, on heavy metal, the two split down
the middle.
Spotting a trend, Friend cautioned, "Because of the deterioration in
public education, larger and larger segments of the population are
creeping downward IQ-wise, cementing the hold Republicans have on the
electorate." However, if the election were held today, Bush would hold
a lead of 52-48 in the popular vote, but would be virtually tied in
the Electoral College, which Bush supporters argue against because the
word College angers them. When contacted, a Kerry spokesman just
chuckled. No Bush spokesperson was made available for comment. It was
also found that Ralph Nader supporters were the brightest of all
political proponents tested, but Dr. Friend dismissed them as "too
smart for their own good."
ex_cathedra
Check this out it's funny!
http://pssht.com/fauxnews/biohammity.html
ex_cathedra
They are merely jellyfish that do the bidding of the Rendon Group.
They have Nate Clay on Saturday in the wee hours(no doubt the lowest
number of listeners possible at that time)but otherwise it's the
Rendon Groups poopaganda cheerleader squad.
It literally is State Sponsored Radio comrade.
Taxpayers pay the Rendon Group to form opinions for us and drill it
into the heads of the stupid that are still watching TV and listening
to the meansteam radio.
ex_cathedra
> I don't hold Hannity's resume against him. He's an articulate spokesman
> for the right who's always well prepared with ambushes to trip up the
> guests on the left.
Elmo and Big Bird could do it with a script set of Karl Roves "talking
points" and the ability to hang up and get the last word with a 10
second delay.
Heck, even someone whacked out on taking hundreds of Hillbilly Heroin
Pills could do it.
Hillbilly Heroin Oxycontin pills have dangerous side effects if you
abuse them.
What happens is you lose your hearing.
In Rush Limbaughs case it was just a coincidence.
Ha
So a deaf doped up lunatic could even do it.
Not to mention have the calls screened.
Not to mention if someone does say anything that gets through the
barrage of obstacles,whos to say the underhanded house painter (Hitler
was a house painter btw) bully wouldn't have one of the staff or other
on hand poopagandists on saying they're a caller and slurp Hannity 5
times over for every "liberal" that makes it past the gauntlet of
Rendon Group,taxpayer funded poopieganda those people are really just
listeners?
I don't think anything about the meansteam press is legitamate.
And I do hold his puny resume against him.
He's not articulate,he's got Neocon talking points and loser waggin
yer dog that doesn't want to go back to painting houses.
> My problem with his show is Fox simulates real
> debate by offering up knock down liberal co-moderator Alan Colmes whose
> sole role appears to be to get his ass routinely handed to him on a
> plate. I've never seen Colmes win an argument. Not once. Worse, much of
> the time he doesn't even offer a response. He just sits there like a
> lump with a vacant look on his face. So the poor liberal guests
> routinely get stuck facing a tag-team of Hannity and some conservative
> guest while Colmes sits on the sidelines. Conservative guests get a buy
> with Colmes tossing out some anemic softball questions while Hannity
> swaps spit with them when Colmes is done going through the motions.
>
> Of course, that's how "fair and balanced" Fox wants it because it
> marketing niche is conservatives.
>
But he is a good spokesman for the GOP
The GOP: A Criminal Organization :: Intervention Magazine :: War,
Politics, Culture
http://www.interventionmag.com/cms/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=908&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
ex_cathedra
The sad thing is if you call the advertisers the advertisers get
rude.
(I tried that a while back)
(Fat Slob) Jay Marvin was going on about drug testing children in
school,and all employees (for the non legal drugs while rearranged
cocaine molecules Class 3 methamphetamine Ritalin IS legal
http://www.ritalindeath.org)
The news that day was saying how overweight employees cost our
glorious corporations $$$$ and employees needed to be counseled for
thier weight problems and treated.
I even called WLS and asked if they were counselling Jay and getting
him treatment for his problem,and why doesn't Jay Marvin talk about
the overweight problem.
I guess they're afraid to confront him because he's a sucidal nutcase
with a bad childhood and figure he might go whacky and kill hisself.
But a regular consumer at thier job overweight suicidal probably would
be pushed over the edge.
And have to take the ride.
Jay Marvin suffers from depression and makes no bones about his use
of medication to be "normal".
That whole station is like the Twilight Zone
I'd say get a shortwave radio...it was the internet of the 20's thru
40's and is still has some reliable documentable broadcasts.
Or listen to Rendon Group/Taxpayer funded meansteam "programming"
delivered by Hillbilly Heroin addicts Housepainters,nutcases,gambling
addicts,and guys abused by their father like deepockets O'Rielly.
ewwwwwwwwwwww!
Eris
I listened, she brought up late term abortion, an other slip.
ex_cathedra
> excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra) wrote:
>
> > I was listening to Nate Clay on WLS last night (the only
> > intelligent show on the entire WLS 890AM lineup), and
> > found out that Hannity's political accomplishments
> > were his electrician's license in 1986, and house painter
> > before becoming the supreme authority on who is and
> > who isn't a conservative.
>
> > If you look at Nate Clay's resume on WLS's webpage
> > you have to wonder why a guy like Clay is subjugated
> > to a Saturday night/early Sunday between 12 and
> > 3 am...
>
Well the days of the customer always being right are long over.
The Rendon Group and Clear channel know information is power.
And they control the "partnerships"and all the outlets.
Now the misbehaving customers must be punished.
They will collect the easy dummies who love to be entertained with
Black Panther styled attacks
as mentored by the Master and founder Panther David Horowitz's Art Of
Political War (Horowitz: One time enemy of the US
/Stalinist/Marxist/Maoist/Radical/Turned Reaganite Libertarian
Conservative) Karl Rove endorses the cover and reccomended David
Horowitz's book to be used as the Bible of the RNC (one time lifelong
sworn enemy of the US and all it stands for who jumped ship from
Marxists to the Democrats to the Republicans now)
Well somehow fascism creeped in and now the advertiser could give a
rats patoot what you think.
Business 2.0 :: Magazine Article :: What Works :: How to Get Tough ...
... How to Get Tough With Bad Customers By Elizabeth Esfahani,
September ... explains how
ING Direct gets rid of overly demanding customers
While this makes
for some unhappy customers, you also get some ... 2004 Business 2.0
Media Inc ...
www.business2.com/b2/subscribers/ articles/0,17863,692636-2,00.html
I disagree that he draws ad bucks.
There are partnerships and they're all guaranteed a spot on the only
game in town.
ex_cathedra
> excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra) wrote:
>
> Some revealing crap. Not about Hannity, but about him.
>
> Apparently having a normal manual labor job in the past disqualifies
> them to have an opinion in the present or the future. One must go right
> from the cradle to one's present job.
>
> I guess this shows why they feel so strongly about people like Kerry and
> Clinton, who never had any job other than political.
There you go again....
Thats just what Sean Handyman would have reverted to.
Klinton.
LOL
Klinton wasn't a radio parrot with GOP talking points.
He was alleged to be the President.
( He sucked too BTW. )
But you my uneducated friend are mixing apples with oranges.
You sound like a house painter.
Hitler was a house painter too!
Did ya know that?
Yep.
> People who actually
> work for a living are to be looked down on with scorn.
And theres less of them in the US thanks to the cheerleading
housepainter spewing David Horowitz's (The Black Panther
Stalinist/Marxist/Maoist/Racial agitator turned magically delicious to
Karl Rove and the RNC when he said he was _now_ a Reaganite
conservative.
The RNC is chock full of Trotskyites like Wolfowitz and Kristol,Frumm
and Feith.
A stupid housepainter wouldn't care about that.
The communists (that you don't have to worry about anymore thanks to
Veggie brain Reagan)are running the RNC and scooping up the dummies.
>They're only good
> for votes.
Well the appearance of votes ....
http://www.votescam.org/
Eris
I hear that Al Franken chased Hannity into Hannities dressing room.
Shows how brave big Hannity is against huge Franken.
My favorite show was when Hannity tried to use his entire show to get
his Boston Whaler boat delivered on time, by intimidating the dealer.
Several people called up and assured the idiot that no boat broker has
ever delivered a boat on time, and that he would be lucky to see the
boat in the next three weeks.
>Dave
>
ex_cathedra
Wow this post made it all over the usenet!
It doesn't seem anyone really likes Sean the Babyboy Handyman...
Hmmmm
I dunno if you saw this site but it's pretty accurate.
And...chock full of fun!
(I posted it to a different thread)
=-D
http://pssht.com/fauxnews/biohammity.html
Dave Moorman
excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra) wrote:
>
> I'd say get a shortwave radio...it was the internet of the 20's thru
> 40's and is still has some reliable documentable broadcasts.
That can help. You can get good English-language news broadcasts from
several European broadcasters plus the BBC. BBC TV news is available on
Channel 20 at 6PM and 10 PM. If you do buy a shortwave radio, get one
with a synchronous detector. It will make everything much more
intelligible.
Dave
Dave Moorman
> The news that day was saying how overweight employees cost our
> glorious corporations $$$$ and employees needed to be counseled for
> thier weight problems and treated.
The food industry grows by making people fatter. It's inevitable. I
think the fast food joints bear some responsibility for this. If they
never advertised, their responsibility would be reduced. When they
spend hundreds of millions of dollars each year, aim their ads at
children who don't have adult judgment in food matters in order to build
brand loyalty early in life, it's just absolutely disingenuous of the to
say, "Oh, we have nothing to do with what people eat! It's entirely up
to them!"
Dave
Wexford
>
> Some revealing crap. Not about Hannity, but about him.
>
> Apparently having a normal manual labor job in the past disqualifies
> them to have an opinion in the present or the future. One must go right
> from the cradle to one's present job.
>
> I guess this shows why they feel so strongly about people like Kerry and
> Clinton, who never had any job other than political. People who actually
> work for a living are to be looked down on with scorn. They're only good
> for votes.
Hannity was on the radio for several years down here in Georgia before
he was drafted and remade by Fox. While he was down here, he was
boring and seemed to be politically illiterate (really quite stupid),
certainly not the attack dog he is now. The only thing he had was a
firm right-wing prejudice, which kept him going on WQST, whose
programming largely appealed to the sports-talk and low-brow
right-wing radio crowd. When he left, he was replaced by Dr. Laura,
who has since been replaced by a sports-talk jock. I knew his wife,
Jill (in fact, she was my editor for several years), a very nice and
pleasant woman.
Sean got the job in New York -- hired mostly for his looks -- and the
first thing they did was put him through eight weeks of training. All
of that schtick of his -- the paper and "notes," the hair cut, the
suits (which he never wore down here), the pen, the pointing, the
responses (e.g. " Isn't that a LIBERAL newspaper you're quoting
from?"), are all artifical. He was molded and trained to do that. He's
put through rehearsals for every show, and repeats stock phrases and
lines in response to almost any issue. I know he didn't write his
books. The thought of him actually writing a coherent book is
phantasmagorical. Pigs would fly first. The books are outlined and
written by the Fox staff. Jill, his wife, does some editing. Sean
poses for the covers.
I once heard him say that he'd only spent one semester in college,
that he just wasn't cut out for higher education. In other words, he
flunked out and never returned to school. He's just an ignorant bozo
who has the right looks, the meanness, and is just glib enough to make
it with the Fox crowd. Low brows love him.
Wexford
The True AntiLiberal
> And electrician and house painter? Huh.
>
> What a scam he's wrought.
Just another elitist.
Adam Albright
Sissy boy Sean is a Limbaugh wannabe. Notice lardass never lets him
sub any more.
hol99
"Wexford" <wexfo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f53a27bf.04110...@posting.google.com...
> Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in message
> news:<Xns95946D77FB328...@216.168.3.44>...
>> excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra) wrote:
>
> Hannity was on the radio for several years down here in Georgia before
> he was drafted and remade by Fox. While he was down here, he was
> boring and seemed to be politically illiterate (really quite stupid),
He's still quite stupid, but a useful tool for the GOP. He just regurgitates
all
the party talking points, with the requisite rudeness and smugness, and all
the republican chickenhawk pansies get there little vicarious thrill because
Hannity shouted down some woman.
hol99
"glugg" <glug...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bf838b26.04110...@posting.google.com...
No problem that he was a working man. I just find it strange that people
condemn Michael Moore or Al Franken, yet revere this moron. Their all of the
same ilk, if you ask me.
Dave
mclark
Try:
http://johnkerryads.websiteanimal.com/
John Kerry's initial reaction to 9/11:
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/8/6/92357.shtml
M. Clark
Kenneth P. Stox
Drake R8, the only way to truly enjoy SW. ;->
Brent P
> Sissy boy Sean is a Limbaugh wannabe. Notice lardass never lets him
> sub any more.
If Hannity is a limbaugh wannabe he's doing a poor job of it. How anyone
can listen to Hannity everyday, let alone for 3 hours straight I cannot
fathom.
Jim Alder
news:f53a27bf.04110...@posting.google.com:
> Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in message
> news:<Xns95946D77FB328...@216.168.3.44>...
>> excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra) wrote:
>>
>> Some revealing crap. Not about Hannity, but about him.
>>
>> Apparently having a normal manual labor job in the past
>> disqualifies
>> them to have an opinion in the present or the future. One must go
>> right from the cradle to one's present job.
>>
>> I guess this shows why they feel so strongly about people like
>> Kerry and
>> Clinton, who never had any job other than political. People who
>> actually work for a living are to be looked down on with scorn.
>> They're only good for votes.
>
> Hannity was on the radio for several years down here in Georgia before
> he was drafted and remade by Fox. While he was down here, he was
> boring and seemed to be politically illiterate (really quite stupid),
> certainly not the attack dog he is now. The only thing he had was a
> firm right-wing prejudice,
Which is why you found him politically illiterate (really quite stupid).
> which kept him going on WQST, whose
> programming largely appealed to the sports-talk and low-brow
> right-wing radio crowd. When he left, he was replaced by Dr. Laura,
> who has since been replaced by a sports-talk jock. I knew his wife,
> Jill (in fact, she was my editor for several years), a very nice and
> pleasant woman.
>
> Sean got the job in New York -- hired mostly for his looks -- and the
> first thing they did was put him through eight weeks of training. All
> of that schtick of his -- the paper and "notes," the hair cut, the
> suits (which he never wore down here)
On the radio?! LOL!!
> ... the pen, the pointing, the
> responses (e.g. " Isn't that a LIBERAL newspaper you're quoting
> from?"), are all artifical. He was molded and trained to do that. He's
> put through rehearsals for every show, and repeats stock phrases and
> lines in response to almost any issue. I know he didn't write his
> books. The thought of him actually writing a coherent book is
> phantasmagorical. Pigs would fly first. The books are outlined and
> written by the Fox staff. Jill, his wife, does some editing. Sean
> poses for the covers.
>
> I once heard him say that he'd only spent one semester in college,
> that he just wasn't cut out for higher education. In other words, he
> flunked out and never returned to school.
Those are certainly 'other words' all right.
> He's just an ignorant bozo
> who has the right looks, the meanness, and is just glib enough to make
> it with the Fox crowd. Low brows love him.
I'm surprised the Democrats didn't endorse him for President. I guess
they don't share your opinion.
Dave Moorman
That's for sure - definitely an excellent receiver but a little pricey.
I stick with the lowly ICF-2010.
Dave
Jim Alder
news:bVEhd.74242$bk1.32425@fed1read05:
> No problem that he was a working man. I just find it strange that
> people condemn Michael Moore or Al Franken, yet revere this moron.
> Their all of the same ilk, if you ask me.
I don't know of anyone ridiculing Moore or Franken for their previous
menial occupations. I don't even know what job or jobs Moore had before he
became a lying maker of schlockumentaries. All I know of Franken is that he
was a poor comic on TV before he became... well., a poor comic on radio.
That's not my opinion, His last TV show stunk up the airwaves for mere
weeks before it was put to sleep. I thought he stunk on SNL, too, but that
would be an opinion. However, it was an opinion formed long before he began
blathering on about politics.
I've never seen a house painted by Hannity, so I can't base an opinion
on anything but his present work. You can lie and tell us that he is
'rehearsed' and 'a moron' but one has only to listen to him to know better.
One doesn't rehearse callers to the show or interviews with hostile
liberals. Kennedy and Moore have both been invited to the show - actually
challenged to show up - but run from the very idea. If he's a moron, why
don't they go on his show and expose that fact? I'm pretty sure that, deep
down, even you know the answer to that.
Jim Alder
news:p1Phd.355990$D%.317713@attbi_s51:
We'll add that to the list of things you can't fathom.
Brent P
> tetraethylle...@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote in
> news:p1Phd.355990$D%.317713@attbi_s51:
>
>> In article <rk5eo0d35l0iui9dc...@4ax.com>, Adam Albright
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sissy boy Sean is a Limbaugh wannabe. Notice lardass never lets him
>>> sub any more.
>>
>> If Hannity is a limbaugh wannabe he's doing a poor job of it. How
>> anyone can listen to Hannity everyday, let alone for 3 hours straight I
>> cannot fathom.
>
> We'll add that to the list of things you can't fathom.
>
Limbaugh is at least funny and makes rational arguements. Hannity on the
other hand....
Bring back chicago PM and that married couple that used to be on WLS
before hannity....
Nicik Name
"Brent P" <tetraethylle...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:p1Phd.355990$D%.317713@attbi_s51...
>
>
Cheney's Ass to Casper
> "hol99" <no...@youknow.com> wrote in
> news:bVEhd.74242$bk1.32425@fed1read05:
>
>
>>No problem that he was a working man. I just find it strange that
>>people condemn Michael Moore or Al Franken, yet revere this moron.
>>Their all of the same ilk, if you ask me.
>
>
> I don't know of anyone ridiculing Moore or Franken for their previous
> menial occupations. I don't even know what job or jobs Moore had before he
> became a lying maker of schlockumentaries. All I know of Franken is that he
> was a poor comic on TV before he became... well., a poor comic on radio.
> That's not my opinion, His last TV show stunk up the airwaves for mere
> weeks before it was put to sleep. I thought he stunk on SNL, too, but that
> would be an opinion. However, it was an opinion formed long before he began
> blathering on about politics.
>
> I've never seen a house painted by Hannity, so I can't base an opinion
> on anything but his present work. You can lie and tell us that he is
> 'rehearsed' and 'a moron' but one has only to listen to him to know better.
> One doesn't rehearse callers to the show or interviews with hostile
> liberals. Kennedy and Moore have both been invited to the show - actually
> challenged to show up - but run from the very idea. If he's a moron, why
> don't they go on his show and expose that fact? I'm pretty sure that, deep
> down, even you know the answer to that.
>
>
But, Hannity IS a little piece of right wing shit, a massive
liar of a little bastardly turd, and consequently you adore
the little sonofabitch.
He's gotta be your hero, Zero.
--
"You know, it's hard work to try to love her as best as I can, knowing full
well that the decision I made caused her loved one to be in harm's
way." -George W. Bush, presidential debate, Coral Gables, Fla., Sept. 30,
2004
Cheney's Ass to Casper
They're BOTH dickheads, but Hannity needs to have his
nuts crushed in a vise.
Jim Alder
Are you mentoring Al Franken in his attempts to become a more mature
political pundit?
> He's gotta be your hero, Zero.
I sometimes wonder how foulmouthed little punks like you manage to
maintain the slightest bit of self-esteem. Do you ever leave your parents'
basement?
Cheney's Ass to Casper
Did I mention? Suck my dick.
Jim Alder
> Jim Alder wrote:
>
>> Cheney's Ass to Casper <_> wrote in news:4188...@nntp.zianet.com:
>>
>>>But, Hannity IS a little piece of right wing shit, a massive
>>>liar of a little bastardly turd, and consequently you adore
>>>the little sonofabitch.
>>
>> Are you mentoring Al Franken in his attempts to become a more
>> mature political pundit?
>>
>>>He's gotta be your hero, Zero.
>>
>> I sometimes wonder how foulmouthed little punks like you manage to
>> maintain the slightest bit of self-esteem. Do you ever leave your
>> parents' basement?
>
> Did I mention? Suck my dick.
We'll call that a 'no' on the basement question.
ex_cathedra
No in his promo shots to make a sows ear look like a silk purse.
>
> > ... the pen, the pointing, the
> > responses (e.g. " Isn't that a LIBERAL newspaper you're quoting
> > from?"), are all artifical. He was molded and trained to do that. He's
> > put through rehearsals for every show, and repeats stock phrases and
> > lines in response to almost any issue. I know he didn't write his
> > books. The thought of him actually writing a coherent book is
> > phantasmagorical. Pigs would fly first. The books are outlined and
> > written by the Fox staff. Jill, his wife, does some editing. Sean
> > poses for the covers.
> >
> > I once heard him say that he'd only spent one semester in college,
> > that he just wasn't cut out for higher education. In other words, he
> > flunked out and never returned to school.
>
> Those are certainly 'other words' all right.
>
You certianly are a fart smeller er,smart feller for making that
deduction Jimmy Poo
> > He's just an ignorant bozo
> > who has the right looks, the meanness, and is just glib enough to make
> > it with the Fox crowd. Low brows love him.
>
> I'm surprised the Democrats didn't endorse him for President. I guess
> they don't share your opinion.
>
The Democrats LOL
Bush's cousin and fellow skull and bones frat brother
sure didn't waste any time concedeing that dog and pony election
wrought with fraud.
He just rolled over and said...
Seeeeee Ya !
I just finally rented Farenheiht 911 AND Farenhype 911
at the same time.
One from the controlled left,and one from the controlled right.
And when it came to the Carlyle Group you see the so called Democrats
and the so called Republicans are both fulla shit,and that they are
equally as crooked and complicit in thier corruption.
You're crazy if you think the Democrats and Republicans stink any
worse than the other.
Those of us who were awake didn't fall for the alleged two party
system fake election.
But you can hate each other or label anyone you want a liberal and
fall as a divided nation.
You need Hannity's and Moore's to make that shill game work.
They both snitch on each other in those movies and only an ignorant
fool wouldn't see through it.
It's Hannity Limbaugh's and Moores,and Frankens job
to keep your eyes off the prize.
And divide you in preperation for your conquering.
Love your neighbor as yourself.
The golden rule....
Don't follow it and there will be consequences....
Crime doesn't pay.
Another golden rule...
These corrupted fools will only get worse and eventually destroy
themselves.
And you with them.
Criminals are stupid and they will always f-things up
and destroy themselves and everything around them when left unchecked.
> --
> Kerry claims Republicans disenfranchised 1 million black voters in Florida
> in 2000, but neglects to mention that after extensive and expensive
> hearings, the U.S. Civil Rights Commission failed to name a single one of
> them. Can you name just one out of that "million," Sen. Kerry? We've found
> more WMDs in Iraq than we've found disenfranchised blacks in Florida.
>
> Indeed - to the contrary! - in 2000, blacks composed 11 percent of
> registered voters in Florida, but made up 17 percent of those who actually
> voted. If that's how Republicans "suppress" the black vote, blacks are
> better off when Republicans attack them than when Democrats pretend to be
> nice to them. - Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter is insane.
Part of the controlled right.
The anti-Moore so to speak.
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/
The exit polls matched the votes when there were no secret software
machines and didn't when there were secret software machines used.
It doesn't really matter because Kerry was a Fraud and the lie that
his Skull and Bones membership was just a college prank was only
believed by idiots.
The 10,000 lawyers was a nice touch LOL
He rolled right over.
So when the vote fraud was uncovered it would be too late to do
anything about it.
Dean had 70% and through the magic of the same dirty voting machines
(that the Russians are even laughing at) Skull and Bones cousin Kerry
magically got nominated to "run" against his cousin.
Hahahaha
===
American Sunset
"Look, dear! Don't the chemtrails look lovely tonight..."
By John Kaminski
sky...@comcast.net
11-6-4
Oh, the gnashing of teeth, the beating of breasts, the wailings of
woe.
Bush and the Republicans stole the election! Big surprise, eh? The
neocon Nazis have done nothing but break the law since before they
ever took office. You were expecting fair play from them, perchance?
Much as I admire many of my friends who are desperately trying to tell
everyone that the exit polls matched the election results in all the
states with a paper trail, but didn't in states without one -
suspiciously and substantially favoring Bush instead - they all are,
to put it politely, whizzing into the wind. Perhaps they hope to find
a prosecutor aspiring to career suicide, or maybe a judge who wishes
to see his family killed in some kind of odd accident, an inexplicable
plane crash, perhaps..
Of course, it is of some substantive concern that the American
electoral process has been placed in the hands of partisan
corporations, guaranteeing about as much integrity as typical
government reports saying antidepressants are good for children, or
the feds have no idea who committed the anthrax murders, or
corporations should not be held liable for their lethal products
because it's bad for business.
Your vote didn't count last time. Why would you expect it would now?
And anyway, here's a more important question.
How, in an election year where the central questions should have been
about waging wars based on well-known lies and throwing away the lives
of American soldiers chasing phantoms who don't exist - as well as
questioning the cynical coverup of the greatest crime in American
history, which 3,000 Americans were murdered by these same phantoms
.... how could these momentous questions be overshadowed on election
day by a relatively irrelevant brouhaha about gay marriage?
In fact, it was because the loyal opposition chose not to mention
these issues, but instead participated in the media coverup of these
crimes, because in fact there is only one party in this country - the
party of the banks. On that level this election was a complete sham.
There was no real contest. So why are you so upset about the results
of an election in which both candidates were saying the same thing?
Hell, it's only too appropriate the results were manipulated, given
the insincere similarity of the candidates.
Evil electronic electioneering and deliberately distracting debates
are not the top stories of this election.
When all was said and done, your vote didn't really matter because
John Kerry essentially agreed with everything Bush had done during his
capital-crime-plagued first term. (Capital crimes, as in treason and
mass murder.) Kerry promised to INCREASE the war effort in Iraq. He
accepts the reality of the cover story of Arab hijackers. He helped
write the Patriot Act. Fifteen years ago, he helped cover up the BCCI
scandal, another one of the great robberies in American history.
So, why are so many so upset that Republican vote-counting executives
stole the election for Bush in Ohio, Florida, Georgia, and God knows
where else? We know having Kerry, Bush's fraternity brother, in the
White House would have made absolutely no difference in terms of
government policy.
So why is everyone so upset that Kerry so quickly conceded, getting
himself out that contrived dog-and-pony show as fast as possible? Why
is anyone upset that Kerry lost? Nothing would have changed!
Why bother working to overturn an election when success would mean
installing a candidate who would do nothing different from the man who
won? Now that's what I call a totally futile effort.
No, there is a bigger question than vote fraud, or the manipulation of
public opinion by unscrupulous media corporations, or the fact that
the two political parties are actually one, and that the loyal
opposition seeks only to emulate the party in power rather than oppose
it, which means it no longer has a chance of winning anything.
The biggest question of all is about the caliber - and the sanity - of
the American people.
The mask is off now.
The lies used to justify the continuing slaughter of innocent people
in Iraq fester like an infected scab on the psyche of the American
people, who have become so twisted in their pursuit of narcotized
tranquility that they are now even cheering the deaths of their own
children who come home in boxes we are not allowed to see. How much
more insane can it get before blissful blackness will alleviate our
misery?
If souls were faces, Americans would gaze into their bathroom mirrors
each morning and see their rotting skin covered with oozing sores,
putrescent pustules of their suicidal disease caused by their
intransigent focus on tormenting trivialities, caused by their willing
ignorance of their soldiers - their own children - raping Iraqi
children, blowing Iraqi families to bits, then, as their deeds set
into their curdled spirits, coming home and hanging themselves in the
shattering silence of realizing their own horrified depravity.
Do you have a child in the military?
Chances are fairly good - if he is still alive - he has become a
murderer, or a rapist, or that he has become sickened to the point
that his life is ruined, which means that your life is ruined, if you
have any feelings at all.
This is America 2004. A willing blindness drapes the land like a
shroud, where old men beat their war drums and young men say, "hey,
this is really cool!" in the millisecond before they lose a limb to a
land mine, or frag an unknown family into bleeding bits of twitching
protoplasm.
Americans have not only lost their souls into insane religious
practices, they've lost their brains as well. What other country on
Earth can't even keep track of its own voting process, that offers two
candidates who are handpicked androids of the power elite, who both
cheerily endorse senseless killing of people already oppressed by
enemies invented by the very people who fight them?
I ask again: Do you have a child in the military?
Because if you don't, you will soon. What will you do when your child
is drafted into the military and sent to Iraq to kill innocent people
for reasons that you know in your heart are lies?
Will you wave your flag, like most Americans do, just as you have
dutifully cast your vote?
The election is over. It didn't matter who won. What matters is that
America has lost, and Americans eagerly helped her lose, just as
Americans eagerly kill people all over the world for reasons that they
know are lies. Since both candidates were pursuing the same policies
in regard to making unjust war, in this election, Americans voted
overwhelmingly - almost 100 percent - to kill their own children for
reasons that they know are lies. And kill anyone else within
convenient shooting distance.
Long live the empire. Let the killing continue.
Stop whining about the vote. You got exactly what you deserved. A
homicidal liar with the weaponry - and the willingness - to kill
everyone on the planet.
This is the new American dream, and it's your worst nightmare.
You have only yourself to thank for not paying attention. Have a nice
day.
John Kaminski's essays have appeared on hundreds of websites around
the world and have been collected into two anthologies. The latest,
titled "The Perfect Enemy," is available at
http://www.johnkaminski.com/
Jim Alder
news:a1928239.04110...@posting.google.com:
> Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote...
>> wexfo...@yahoo.com (Wexford) wrote:
>> > Sean got the job in New York -- hired mostly for his looks -- and
>> > the first thing they did was put him through eight weeks of
>> > training. All of that schtick of his -- the paper and "notes," the
>> > hair cut, the suits (which he never wore down here)
>>
>> On the radio?! LOL!!
>
> No in his promo shots to make a sows ear look like a silk purse.
So they took pictures to promote his new show and he got a haircut and
put on a suit! Why, that duplicitous motherfucker!!!!
Heh heh! You jerks are priceless. Like anyone would wear a suit in
Georgia. Hell, even Matlock only owns one suit!
>> > I once heard him say that he'd only spent one semester in college,
>> > that he just wasn't cut out for higher education. In other words, he
>> > flunked out and never returned to school.
>>
>> Those are certainly 'other words' all right.
>
> You certianly are a fart smeller er,smart feller for making that
> deduction Jimmy Poo
And you are apparently NOT a smart fella for not realizing my point,
that when MOST people say 'in other words' they say something that means
the same thing.
<gibberish snipped - a LOT of it>
--
"I miss voter fraud." - Jon Stewart; The Daily Show.
Wexford
> wexfo...@yahoo.com (Wexford) wrote in
> news:f53a27bf.04110...@posting.google.com:
>
> > Jim Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in message
> > news:<Xns95946D77FB328...@216.168.3.44>...
> >> excat...@eboxmail.net (ex_cathedra) wrote:
> >>
> >> Some revealing crap. Not about Hannity, but about him.
> >>
> >> Apparently having a normal manual labor job in the past
> >> disqualifies
> >> them to have an opinion in the present or the future. One must go
> >> right from the cradle to one's present job.
> >>
> >> I guess this shows why they feel so strongly about people like
> >> Kerry and
> >> Clinton, who never had any job other than political. People who
> >> actually work for a living are to be looked down on with scorn.
> >> They're only good for votes.
> >
> > Hannity was on the radio for several years down here in Georgia before
> > he was drafted and remade by Fox. While he was down here, he was
> > boring and seemed to be politically illiterate (really quite stupid),
> > certainly not the attack dog he is now. The only thing he had was a
> > firm right-wing prejudice,
>
> Which is why you found him politically illiterate (really quite stupid).
No, it was because he was stupidly right wing. If you have a point of
view and it's backed by some facts and some erudition, then, fine,
I'll respect it. If your point of view is based solely on a
superficial repetition of right-wing propaganda (or left-wing
propaganda for that matter), then you're just another talking head, a
glib idiot.
>
> > which kept him going on WQST, whose
> > programming largely appealed to the sports-talk and low-brow
> > right-wing radio crowd. When he left, he was replaced by Dr. Laura,
> > who has since been replaced by a sports-talk jock. I knew his wife,
> > Jill (in fact, she was my editor for several years), a very nice and
> > pleasant woman.
> >
> > Sean got the job in New York -- hired mostly for his looks -- and the
> > first thing they did was put him through eight weeks of training. All
> > of that schtick of his -- the paper and "notes," the hair cut, the
> > suits (which he never wore down here)
>
> On the radio?! LOL!!
He made a lot of appearances down here, and he invariably dressed in
jeans or chinos, even when he appeared on television. Suits weren't
part of his "look."
>
> > ... the pen, the pointing, the
> > responses (e.g. " Isn't that a LIBERAL newspaper you're quoting
> > from?"), are all artifical. He was molded and trained to do that. He's
> > put through rehearsals for every show, and repeats stock phrases and
> > lines in response to almost any issue. I know he didn't write his
> > books. The thought of him actually writing a coherent book is
> > phantasmagorical. Pigs would fly first. The books are outlined and
> > written by the Fox staff. Jill, his wife, does some editing. Sean
> > poses for the covers.
> >
> > I once heard him say that he'd only spent one semester in college,
> > that he just wasn't cut out for higher education. In other words, he
> > flunked out and never returned to school.
>
> Those are certainly 'other words' all right.
He admitted it.
>
> > He's just an ignorant bozo
> > who has the right looks, the meanness, and is just glib enough to make
> > it with the Fox crowd. Low brows love him.
>
> I'm surprised the Democrats didn't endorse him for President. I guess
> they don't share your opinion.
No, but the Republicans love him.
Wexford
Jim Alder
I know stupid when I hear it, and Hannity ain't it.
>> > which kept him going on WQST, whose
>> > programming largely appealed to the sports-talk and low-brow
>> > right-wing radio crowd. When he left, he was replaced by Dr. Laura,
>> > who has since been replaced by a sports-talk jock. I knew his wife,
>> > Jill (in fact, she was my editor for several years), a very nice and
>> > pleasant woman.
>> >
>> > Sean got the job in New York -- hired mostly for his looks -- and
>> > the first thing they did was put him through eight weeks of
>> > training. All of that schtick of his -- the paper and "notes," the
>> > hair cut, the suits (which he never wore down here)
>>
>> On the radio?! LOL!!
>
> He made a lot of appearances down here, and he invariably dressed in
> jeans or chinos, even when he appeared on television. Suits weren't
> part of his "look."
In Georgia? Even Matlock only has one suit. (He's in Georgia, isn't he?)
New York is a different world. People adapt, especially in show biz.
>> > ... the pen, the pointing, the
>> > responses (e.g. " Isn't that a LIBERAL newspaper you're quoting
>> > from?"), are all artifical. He was molded and trained to do that.
>> > He's put through rehearsals for every show, and repeats stock
>> > phrases and lines in response to almost any issue. I know he didn't
>> > write his books. The thought of him actually writing a coherent book
>> > is phantasmagorical. Pigs would fly first. The books are outlined
>> > and written by the Fox staff. Jill, his wife, does some editing.
>> > Sean poses for the covers.
>> >
>> > I once heard him say that he'd only spent one semester in college,
>> > that he just wasn't cut out for higher education. In other words, he
>> > flunked out and never returned to school.
>>
>> Those are certainly 'other words' all right.
>
> He admitted it.
Then why did you have to use "other words?" You said he said he wasn't
cut out for it. Did he leave or did he "flunk out?"
>> > He's just an ignorant bozo
>> > who has the right looks, the meanness, and is just glib enough to
>> > make it with the Fox crowd. Low brows love him.
>>
>> I'm surprised the Democrats didn't endorse him for President. I
>> guess they don't share your opinion.
>
> No, but the Republicans love him.
Oh, yeah. I want to have his baby.
ex_cathedra
It takes one to know one LOL
That why he seems sMaRt to you.
You can put a fat man deaf from Oxycontin abuse in his chair in front
of a microphone and get the same thing if you have a delay,and can
hang up on anyone intelligent .
All you need is your Frank Luntz (what a putz) talking points
« Puddentane, Puddentane . . . | Main | Revisiting the Goal Posts »
June 21, 2004
The Republican Talking Points
by Kevin
Atrios has a copy of a memo Luntz -- a Republican pollster who also
has his own show on MSNBC -- has issued consiting of talking points
for Republicans for the upcoming election. Essentially, they are going
to do their darnedest to tie Iraq to the war on terrorism directly,
and implicitly to 9/11. He also recommends, essentially, highlighting
the "flypaper" strategy Some highlights (and marvel in the manner in
which it treats voters as, well, children):
"9/11 changed everything" is the context by which everything follows.
No speech about homeland security or Iraq should begin without a
reference to 9/11.
2) The principles of "prevention and protection" still have universal
support and should be addressed prior to talking about Iraq.
3) "Prevention at home can require aggressive action abroad" is the
best way to link a principle the public supports with the policies of
the Administration. "It is better to fight the War on Terror on the
streets of Baghdad than on the streets of New York or Washington." 4)
"Terrorism has no boundaries, and neither should efforts to prevent
it." Talk about how terrorism has taken the lives of the British, the
Spanish, Italians, Germans, Israelis, innocents from all across the
globe. Remind listeners that this is truly an international challenge.
"Americans are not the only target."
5) "The world is a better place without Saddam Hussein." Enough said.
....
Connect the dots. You have to explain Iraq's role in the "Wider War on
Terror." Americans expected smoking-gun caliber evidence of weapons of
mass destruction. So long as that kind of irrefutable proof isn't
available, a different tact toward indicting the Saddam regime must be
taken. The Iraqi regime must be indicted because they committed same
kinds of actions as those of other terrorists. Associate them by their
actions, their goals, and their behavior. The following language from
President Bush is precisely the right way to make the case:
The violence we are seeing in Iraq is familiar. The terrorists who
take hostages or plants a roadside bomb near Baghdad is serving the
same ideology of murder that kills innocent people on trains in
Madrid, and murders children on buses in Jerusalem, and blows up a
nightclub in Bali and cuts the throat of a young reporter for being a
Jew. We've seen the same ideology of murder in the killing of 241
Marines in Beirut, the first attack on the World Trade Center, in the
destruction of two embassies in Africa, in the attack on the USS Cole,
and in the merciless horror inflicted upon thousands of innocent men
and women and children on September the 11th, 2001." -- President
George W. Bush
(emphasis added)
Obviously, Luntz is arguing that Republicans should connect Iraq and
9/11 in their speeches - -to give the impression that 9/11 and Iraq
are tied together, in nature if not in casue.
That last bit is good, too: Luntz is arguing that Republicans should
make the case that because there are terrorists in Iraq now -- largely
because of the incompetence of the Bush Administration -- that it was
the right tactic in the war on terrorism to invade Iraq when, even
though there were no WMDs and no ties to al-Queda.
And now, the moral black-hole that is the "flypaper" strategy:
If you describe it simply as "preemptive action," some Americans will
carry deep reservations about the rightness of the cause. Americans
are conditioned to think that hitting first is usually wrong. If,
however, you have successfully connected Iraq to the wider War on
Terror, and if you are able to personalize this policy ("attacking
them before they can attack us"), then you will have addressed their
concerns. By far, the better word to use than "preemption" is
"PREVENTION." And how do you personalize prevention? By letting your
audience know that we should make every effort to fight the war on
terror on THEIR turf, not ours – that it be fought on THEIR soil, not
ours
http://www.leanleft.com/archives/003171.html
>
> >> > which kept him going on WQST, whose
> >> > programming largely appealed to the sports-talk and low-brow
> >> > right-wing radio crowd. When he left, he was replaced by Dr. Laura,
> >> > who has since been replaced by a sports-talk jock. I knew his wife,
> >> > Jill (in fact, she was my editor for several years), a very nice and
> >> > pleasant woman.
> >> >
> >> > Sean got the job in New York -- hired mostly for his looks -- and
> >> > the first thing they did was put him through eight weeks of
> >> > training. All of that schtick of his -- the paper and "notes," the
> >> > hair cut, the suits (which he never wore down here)
> >>
> >> On the radio?! LOL!!
> >
> > He made a lot of appearances down here, and he invariably dressed in
> > jeans or chinos, even when he appeared on television. Suits weren't
> > part of his "look."
>
> In Georgia? Even Matlock only has one suit. (He's in Georgia, isn't he?)
> New York is a different world. People adapt, especially in show biz.
Thats right... its just a show.
And Sean Handyman is the monkey dancing around the organ grinder.
Too bad you can't adapt intelligence.
>
> >> > ... the pen, the pointing, the
> >> > responses (e.g. " Isn't that a LIBERAL newspaper you're quoting
> >> > from?"), are all artifical. He was molded and trained to do that.
> >> > He's put through rehearsals for every show, and repeats stock
> >> > phrases and lines in response to almost any issue. I know he didn't
> >> > write his books. The thought of him actually writing a coherent book
> >> > is phantasmagorical. Pigs would fly first. The books are outlined
> >> > and written by the Fox staff. Jill, his wife, does some editing.
> >> > Sean poses for the covers.
> >> >
> >> > I once heard him say that he'd only spent one semester in college,
> >> > that he just wasn't cut out for higher education. In other words, he
> >> > flunked out and never returned to school.
> >>
> >> Those are certainly 'other words' all right.
> >
> > He admitted it.
>
> Then why did you have to use "other words?" You said he said he wasn't
> cut out for it. Did he leave or did he "flunk out?"
>
A sea slug could replace him
> >> > He's just an ignorant bozo
> >> > who has the right looks, the meanness, and is just glib enough to
> >> > make it with the Fox crowd. Low brows love him.
> >>
> >> I'm surprised the Democrats didn't endorse him for President. I
> >> guess they don't share your opinion.
> >
> > No, but the Republicans love him.
>
> Oh, yeah. I want to have his baby.
I bet you tried !
(But his baby wouldn't grow in your colon)