why again cheminf.owl and cheminf-core.owl?

[Egon Willighagen]

Hi all,

I was looking at identifiers, and noted that sometimes information is
split up over cheminf.owl and cheminf-core.owl... For example, for the
HMDB identifier the label and description are in the cheminf-core.owl,
while the subClassing is done in cheminf.owl...

What is the reason for that?

Egon

--
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286

[Janna Hastings]

Hi Egon,

I think this was as a result of a failure of the modularisation strategy adopted a while back. I think initially it was the idea that cheminf-core.owl would contain the content and cheminf.owl only have import statements. It didn't end up working out that way and now we appear to have a pretty random and even distribution of content :-(

Cheers, Janna

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cheminf-ontology" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cheminf-ontolo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.