I am looking at the ontology for a ongoing project here on KI around
toxicology, and into converting the BODO to be based on CHEMINF.
This resulted in these two questions/ideas about 'dimensionality
extent quality'.
- can we move this one level up, as not just 'molecular entity's have
such quality?
- how can we extend the current entries to cover ranges and/or
distributions? e.g. for polymers?
The latter could be done with 'length range' or 'radius range', etc...
then a single 'length' is basically just a more specialized version of
it... (where the standard deviation is 0)...
Ideas, comments?
Egon
--
Dr E.L. Willighagen
Postdoctoral Researcher
Institutet för miljömedicin
Karolinska Institutet (http://ki.se/imm)
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
Hi all,
I am looking at the ontology for a ongoing project here on KI around
toxicology, and into converting the BODO to be based on CHEMINF.
This resulted in these two questions/ideas about 'dimensionality
extent quality'.
- can we move this one level up, as not just 'molecular entity's have
such quality?
- how can we extend the current entries to cover ranges and/or
distributions? e.g.' for polymers?
The latter could be done with 'length range' or 'radius range', etc...
then a single 'length' is basically just a more specialized version of
it... (where the standard deviation is 0)...
Ideas, comments?
Egon
--
Dr E.L. Willighagen
Postdoctoral Researcher
Institutet för miljömedicin
Karolinska Institutet (http://ki.se/imm)
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers