That was an attempt to spark a participatory debate on a school
trustee issue. A better example of the overall method (but still a
clumsy application) is this provincial policy debate:
http://rabble.ca/babble/western-provinces/possible-strategy-ginger-group-bc-new-democrats
We just started developing the method, and documenting it here:
http://u.zelea.com/w/User:Mike-ZeleaCom/Discussion_refit
http://u.zelea.com/w/User:Mike-ZeleaCom/Guerilla_gardening
OTOH, I'm not sure an election would be a good atmosphere to explore
any kind of paticipatory approach. It's rare for an electoral debate
to focus sufficiently on concrete issues that people might grapple
with them in any meaningful way. You'd definitely be swimming against
the tide of expectations, in that regard. (Midterm is perhaps better,
with debates focued more on pending bylaw issues.)
And there isn't much time, as you mention. But if you're looking for
ideas, that's one. And I can help if you need more info,
--
Michael Allan
Toronto, +1 647-436-4521
http://zelea.com/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChangeCamp Canada" group.
To post to this group, send email to chang...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to changecamp+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/changecamp?hl=en.