Hi all,
Sorry for the mass e-mail, but I just came across a 2004 ref (Rogers et al., 2004, J. Clin Microbiol, 42:5176-5183) wherein they reverse transcribed 16S RNA and then performed traditional phylotyping after producing 16S amplicons from the cDNA. This seems like a reasonable and straightforward method to identifying the fraction of the community that it is transcriptionally active (as compared to 16S typing from DNA wherein non-viable cells and free DNA will also be typed).
I'm a bit surprised that I haven't this method in more widespread use, so I wanted to poll you experts to (i) get a sense of what you think about the method and (ii) to see if there any methodological pitfalls with this approach that aren't obvious to me.
Hope all are well,
Jim
James C. Sullivan, PhD
Associate Director, Clinical Biomarkers
Translational Medical Sciences
Vertex Pharmaceuticals
130 Waverly Street
Cambridge, MA 02139
Tel:
617-961-7536
This email message and any attachments are confidential and intended for use by the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately by replying to this message, and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.