Re: [CFML] Moderator's spam report for cfml-conventional-wisdom@googlegroups.com

13 views
Skip to first unread message

Alan Williamson

unread,
Feb 4, 2011, 3:51:06 PM2/4/11
to CFML Conventional Wisdom

--
aw2.0 www.aw20.co.uk

-----Original Message-----
From: cfml-conventiona...@googlegroups.com
Sender: cfml-convent...@googlegroups.com
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 20:49:16
To: Spam Moderators<cfml-convention...@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: cfml-convent...@googlegroups.com
Subject: [CFML] Moderator's spam report for cfml-convent...@googlegroups.com

This message is being sent to you because you are a moderator of the group cfml-conventional-wisdom.

The following suspicious messages were sent to your group, but are being held in your moderation queue because they are classified as likely spam messages.

If you take no action, all the messages below will be discarded automatically as spam.

However, if you see any messages that are not spam below, you may approve them individually by going to:

http://groups.google.com/group/cfml-conventional-wisdom/pendmsg

Please do not mark this notification as spam; this is a service for group moderators. If you do not wish to receive these notifications in the future, you may change your preferences by going to:

http://groups.google.com/group/cfml-conventional-wisdom/manage_post


------- 1 of 1 -------
Subject: Re: [CFML] ParseDateTime Patterns
From: Sean Daniels <daniel...@gmail.com>
Date: Feb 02 05:32PM -0500

On Feb 2, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Peter J. Farrell wrote:

> <cfset dt = "Wed Dec 23 05:34:28 +0000 2009">
> <cfdump var=#parsedatetime( dt )#>

Railo 3.2.1.000 (latest production release) in New York time zone returns:

{ts '2009-12-23 00:34:28'}

Approve: http://groups.google.com/group/cfml-conventional-wisdom/pendmsg?view=full&pending_id=227718814575526829


For more information about this message, please visit:
http://groups.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=165806

--
CFML Conventional Wisdom
http://groups.google.com/group/cfml-conventional-wisdom?hl=en?hl=en
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages