I thought that it would be a good addition to the validation list.
Thanks for your consideration,
Regards
Kevin McGrattan
unread,
Dec 9, 2022, 2:58:20 PM12/9/22
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CFAST
Do you know if the experimental data is available?
dr_jfloyd
unread,
Dec 12, 2022, 2:51:02 PM12/12/22
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CFAST
The data looks odd for the experiment based on the description given in the original reference. It is supposedly a 1.6 MW fire in an atrium with no openings other than some 0.2 m high vents at the bottom. The data in Figure 9 shows the temperature in the atrium rising 20 K and then staying steady after ~200 s. In the origingal referenced paper for the test the fire was supposedly still burning at this point in time and the layer at 200 s was ~5 m above the floor z (above the vents). The atrium is 12 m x 22 m x 27 m. This makes the wall and ceiling area above the layer ~1800 m2. For steady-state to be achieved with a temperature rise of 20 C all the heat from the fire must be leaving the layer through the walls. At a 20 C temperature rise this would need a heat transfer coefficient of 1,600,000 W / (1800 m2 * 20 K) = 44 W/m/K. This a pretty large average h for a layer.
fde
unread,
Dec 15, 2022, 10:11:50 AM12/15/22
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CFAST
Unfortunately I am not aware. I have not contacted the author.
fde
unread,
Dec 15, 2022, 10:24:34 AM12/15/22
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to CFAST
Based on your remarks, I understand that the results need deeper review. Thank you for your response.