Proposal for next meeting

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Garrett Smith

unread,
Jan 25, 2010, 12:37:48 PM1/25/10
to Chicago Erlang Users Group
On Sat we were batting around some ideas for content for the next CEUG meeting.

I can still present on Landshark, a web framework that will be hitting
the open source market in a few months.

Here's another option though, which is based on some side
conversations from the Sat meeting...

I think it'd be valuable to have a show-and-tell on work flows that we
use in day-to-day Erlang development.

I'm not thinking of anything advanced like continuous integration,
etc. Just how individuals are most productive in writing Erlang.

As a format, we could have two - three people demo a scenario of how
they write Erlang. This would include stuff like:

- Create a new project (including any VCS setup, which I think would
also be interesting and informative)
- Write, compile, and tinker with (e.g. using on shell, unit test,
etc.) Erlang code
- Package/deploy code (release, application, home brewed, whatever)

Naturally, Sinan/Faxien would be duly represented. I can demo the
makefile approach that I use (and am modifying based on Saturday's
sprint). If anyone else uses another tool chain (Eclipse/ErlIDE comes
to mind as something that folks might be very interested in), it'd be
great to have more points of view. One thing I've never bothered to
setup in my Emacs env is any type of code checker or auto complete.
I'd love to see a kick ass Emacs setup that had some of the goodness
of Eclipse.

Assuming technical issues are preemptively addressed (we need a bad of
VGA dongles at each meeting :) and presenters have run through their
demo before the meeting, I think a limit of 15 - 20 minutes per
presenter should be enough to convey the gist of the work flow. This
would give us plenty of time for ad hoc back-and-forth, beer drinking,
etc.

Thoughts?

Garrett

P.S. Many, many thanks to Peak6 for hosting Saturday's sprint! Beer,
pizza, original art -- not to mention kick ass presentations on OTP
packaging and distribution -- ni

Tristan Sloughter

unread,
Jan 25, 2010, 12:46:27 PM1/25/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
This sounds cool. I'd be interesting to see how others work and hopefully learn something.

I can show my work flow, sinan/faxien, git, emacs. I have emacs setup with ECB that gives it some nice features (function lists, file lists, history, etc), though I don't always bother with them -- an old screenshot of mine can be seen here: http://www.chicagolug.org/wiki/images/6/68/Emacs_screenshot_2.png. And some autocomplete stuff.

Tristan


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chicago Erlang User Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to ce...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ceug+uns...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ceug?hl=en.


Chris Duesing

unread,
Jan 25, 2010, 12:46:37 PM1/25/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
a big hearty +1 on this.

I especially would love to have someone explain Emacs + Erlang in detail. As I mentioned to Martin, I essentially use it as a glorified Notepad with Erlang syntax highlighting.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Garrett Smith <g...@rre.tt> wrote:

selizondo

unread,
Jan 26, 2010, 12:57:59 PM1/26/10
to Chicago Erlang User Group
+1,
since I'm starting out, a demo a of a vim or emacs dev env would be
extremely helpful.

Salomon

Martin Logan

unread,
Jan 26, 2010, 4:01:46 PM1/26/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
looks like you have a winning idea here Garrett. I would be happy to
detail my "git + emacs + vim + faxien + sinan + portius" workflow

Adam Walters

unread,
Jan 27, 2010, 1:06:33 PM1/27/10
to Chicago Erlang User Group
+1 to this as well. Just starting out myself w/ Erlang and would love
to see what others are using to get an idea of my options for editor/
ide.

Look forward to hearing more.

-Adam

Jordan Wilberding

unread,
Jan 27, 2010, 2:19:46 PM1/27/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
There is only one choice: emacs.

Sorry.
JW

Tristan Sloughter

unread,
Jan 27, 2010, 3:16:16 PM1/27/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
Well... There are more... 

GNU Emacs, XEmacs, SXEmacs, Chrome-Emacs, MicroEMACS, mg, Climacs, Yi, .......

Martin Logan

unread,
Jan 27, 2010, 4:39:17 PM1/27/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
Ok, so lets get a sign up list, I am thinking each person gets 10
minutes with a 5 minute setup time. Presenters are as follows so far:

Garrett Smith
Martin Logan

Adam Walters

unread,
Jan 28, 2010, 9:57:32 AM1/28/10
to Chicago Erlang User Group
Is there a date set?

On Jan 27, 3:39 pm, Martin Logan <martinjlo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, so lets get a sign up list, I am thinking each person gets 10
> minutes with a 5 minute setup time.  Presenters are as follows so far:
>
> Garrett Smith
> Martin Logan
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tristan Sloughter
>
>
>
> <kungfoog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well... There are more...
> > GNU Emacs, XEmacs, SXEmacs, Chrome-Emacs, MicroEMACS, mg, Climacs, Yi,
> > .......
>

> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Jordan Wilberding <digi...@gmail.com>


> > wrote:
>
> >> There is only one choice: emacs.
>
> >> Sorry.
> >> JW
>

> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Adam Walters <ajwalt...@gmail.com>

Tristan Sloughter

unread,
Jan 28, 2010, 10:06:10 AM1/28/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
I'll present as well.

Martin Logan

unread,
Jan 28, 2010, 12:17:48 PM1/28/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
Nope, no date yet, how about the wed or thursday the third week of Feb?

Garrett Smith

unread,
Jan 29, 2010, 9:55:27 AM1/29/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
I think keeping with our Wed schedule would be a good idea, all else
equal. That week works fine for me.

Adam Walters

unread,
Jan 29, 2010, 10:02:08 AM1/29/10
to Chicago Erlang User Group
Wed would work for me (so would Thursday).

On Jan 29, 8:55 am, Garrett Smith <g...@rre.tt> wrote:
> I think keeping with our Wed schedule would be a good idea, all else
> equal. That week works fine for me.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Martin Logan <martinjlo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Nope, no date yet, how about the wed or thursday the third week of Feb?
>

> >> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/ceug?hl=en.

Tristan Sloughter

unread,
Jan 29, 2010, 10:06:28 AM1/29/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
Thursday would be better for me.

Jordan Wilberding

unread,
Jan 29, 2010, 10:18:45 AM1/29/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
Wed and Thu good for me as well.

Brian Chamberlain

unread,
Jan 29, 2010, 12:14:38 PM1/29/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
Wednesday would be better for me (class on Tues/Thurs evenings)

-Brian
-Brian

blcham...@gmail.com
@breakpointer

Martin Logan

unread,
Jan 29, 2010, 4:22:11 PM1/29/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
Ok, Wed Feb 17 will be the day. We now need a location. I can secure
Orbitz again but if anyone has an alternate location preference please
speak up.

Cheers,
Martin

Martin Logan

unread,
Jan 29, 2010, 4:24:12 PM1/29/10
to ce...@googlegroups.com
Will Wed work though? Looks like more people can make Wed.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages