Interesting question.
So far we’ve seen
- Companies ‘just doing it’ as the cost of business, for the good of the Internet, etc – e.g., the Google logs
- CA’s running it for their own certs, as part of the cost of doing business in the “CT world”
- Subscription logs, where a CA pays the log operator to get their certs listed
I don’t think we’ve seen any “pay to use” logs.
--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
IM: rich...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
On 20 January 2017 at 13:41, Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote:
> Interesting question.
>
>
>
> So far we’ve seen
>
> - Companies ‘just doing it’ as the cost of business, for the good
> of the Internet, etc – e.g., the Google logs
>
> - CA’s running it for their own certs, as part of the cost of doing
> business in the “CT world”
>
> - Subscription logs, where a CA pays the log operator to get their
> certs listed
>
>
>
> I don’t think we’ve seen any “pay to use” logs.
They wouldn't be much use, since the Chrome CT policy forbids it.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
>
> Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
>
> IM: rich...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "certificate-transparency" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an