Uniform dose inside the target

55 views
Skip to first unread message

Samuele Cavinato

unread,
Oct 21, 2019, 6:12:32 PM10/21/19
to CERR FORUM
Hello everybody!
I'm new with CERR and I have some problem to understand the dose calculation it applies to the target. 
I'm working with one of the test examples, the prostate.
I can't understand the reason why the dose distribution inside the target is always uniform, independently on the beam configuration.  I've tried, for example, with two beams, one at 0° and one at 90° and I would expect it to be non uniform, but it doesn't happen! Is there something more I need to know about?

If anyone could help me to understand I would be very glad!
Thank you!

Aditya Apte

unread,
Oct 22, 2019, 12:08:08 PM10/22/19
to cerr-...@googlegroups.com
Can you please provide more detIails regarding the settings used? The beamlet weights default to 1. Here is documentation on applying beamlet weights to the influence matrix:


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CERR FORUM" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cerr-forum+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cerr-forum/445edb3d-7a39-4666-a490-47d204cdfb84%40googlegroups.com.

Samuele Cavinato

unread,
Oct 22, 2019, 1:15:39 PM10/22/19
to cerr-...@googlegroups.com
Hello,
Thank you for your answer. I'll briefly explain what I do. 

1) I load the plan prostex_9may03.mat.bz from the folder CERR/Unit_Testing/data_for_cerr_tests/CERR_plans
2) From the menu IMRT I create a new IMRTP plan with two beams: the first with gantryAngle 0°, the second with gantryAngle 90°. You can find the screenshot of the IMRTP window in attachment. 
3) As you can see, I decide to work with the PTVHD as target and the BLADDER as OAR. 
4) I click on "Go" and then on "Show", in order to generate the dose map. 
 
Then I go on the "Metrics" panel in order to visualize the DVH for both the BLADDER and the PTVHD. 
You find the result in attachment.  

The point is that I cannot understand why the dose distribution inside the target is so uniform considering that I'm using two beams at 0 and 90 degrees and I'm not performing any optimization. Maybe there's something I'm missing, but I need your help to understand what. 

I hope it's clear now.

Thank you very much, 
    Samuele


Screenshot from 2019-10-22 18-52-20.png
Screenshot from 2019-10-22 19-01-26.png


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages