Git repo branches

12 views
Skip to first unread message

Mike Gunderloy

unread,
May 22, 2009, 10:03:10 AM5/22/09
to Cerberus
At first glance, it looks like Cerberus in its current state will only
build the master branch from a git repo. Is this correct, or have I
just not looked deeply enough?

Craig Jolicoeur

unread,
May 22, 2009, 10:13:26 AM5/22/09
to cerbe...@googlegroups.com
Correct,

Git support was just added in the past few months, and at the moment
it only operates off of the master branch.

Branch support would be a good feature however, so if you are
interested we'd love to have you add it in or open up a support ticket
so we can add the support in for a future release.

- Craig

Craig Jolicoeur

unread,
May 22, 2009, 10:22:16 AM5/22/09
to cerbe...@googlegroups.com
I think that adding branch support for git is actually probably an
excellent idea.

We could just add a :branch option to the project config file to
specify which branch to operate of off.

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mike Gunderloy <Lark...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

Mike Gunderloy

unread,
May 22, 2009, 10:26:05 AM5/22/09
to cerbe...@googlegroups.com
Well, it would eliminate a blocker for me :)

I may take a look at the code if I can steal a few minutes later
today. That sounds like the right approach; just a matter of figuring
out the most git-efficient way to handle.

Mike

Mike Gunderloy

unread,
May 22, 2009, 12:23:46 PM5/22/09
to cerbe...@googlegroups.com
I did a simple-stupid implementation of this and sent you a pull
request on github. Looks to be working OK.

On May 22, 2009, at 9:22 AM, Craig Jolicoeur wrote:

Craig Jolicoeur

unread,
May 22, 2009, 12:59:07 PM5/22/09
to cerbe...@googlegroups.com
awesome thanks. I'll check it out and make sure git branch support is
included in the next upcoming release (version 0.5)

- Craig
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages