So, what do we do about urban blight? Is it a matter of fixing the
cosmetics? Will imposing stricter aesthetic standards automatically
bring prosperity back to the neglected areas of town? I'll have to
agree with Michael Pyatok as he wrote in his NewVillage article that
this is a "chicken and egg" problem. Designers and planners do tend
to look at blighted real estate as mainly a design problem. I think
it is partly that, but it certainly goes deeper. We have to remember
that the visible signs of decay in a neighborhood are just the
symptoms of the real underlying issues. I believe there are actually
at least four basic issues that need to be considered in relation to
reversing blight and boosting a local economy: work & business
opportunities, education, crime prevention, and housing. I know there
are many ways to slice this. However, I think these categories might
work pretty well as a way of organizing our thinking concerning
community action and neighborhood economic development. Think of it
this way, when someone is moving their place of residence what are
they generally going to look at when making a decision about where to
live? These factors are all usually high on the list. "Can I find a
good place to work nearby?" "How are the schools?" "Is there a lot
of crime? (will my children be safe?)" and, "Can I find housing that
meets my needs?"