I also read that article. I was amazed, shocked really, about the role
of Calvin and Calvinism in the Mars Hill Church. I had heard about the
church, but had no idea it was even remotely interested in Calvin. It
seems like most such ventures are virulently anti-Calvin and anti-
Reformed.
The pastor of MHC seems to have a very nineteenth century reading of
Calvin. I wonder if he also has Charles Hodge and B.B. Warfield on his
reading list.
While I know that it is possible to read Calvin in a pre-Enlightenment
and pre-critical manner, I don't recommend it! We live on this side of
the Enlightenment; Calvin lived on the other side of it. I think it
best to read Calvin with both deep appreciation and with critical
judgment. While in a thousand ways Calvin speaks to us in our "world,"
he is not from our context and probably could never have imagined it
if he tried.
I like what Karl Barth said once about reading Calvin (paraphrasing):
"One does not honor Calvin by simply aping what Calvin said. One
honors Calvin rightly by thinking with him about the issues that he
raises." That strikes me as good Reformed and Presbyterian wisdom.
Gordon
> > Here's the link if you'd like:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/magazine/11punk-t.html?em- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -