Note: this was written on the original prompt.
Euripides Medea
Women have, for centuries, been a lower social class of society.
This is just as true for ancient Greece where Euripides lived and
where he writes "Of all things that are living and can form a judgment
we women are the most unfortunate creatures." (9) Medea, his heroine,
live in a patriarchal society where a woman's only power is in
emotional appeals: her love that she once had for her husband... her
despair of her current situation... her hatred of Jason and his
betrayal... her resolve strong enough that she can kill her own children
in cold blood... The emotions of this woman are portrayed vividly in the
text. It is these emotions that both determine her course of action,
and allow her to complete a most terrible revenge. Though deeply
wounded and emotional she is also cruel and Medea explains herself
that "in other ways a woman is full of fear, defenseless, dreads the
sight of cold steel; but, when she is wronged in the matter of love no
other soul can hold s many thoughts of blood." (9) This terrible
anger, and ferocious determination could be read in two ways: the
feminists argue that if she had had more power, and equal status she
could have solved the problem in a much less drastic way. Defenders of
the patriarchy system would look at the same evidence as proof of the
need to control women because, if left on their own, they are capable
of monstrous acts. The evidence in the text balances both views so
that the final interpretation is left up to the individual reader. As
a feminist supporter I read it as blatant proof of her capabilities
and thee frustration of her caged existence, but it would be
impossible to project this onto Euripides designs.
We find Medea in a land that is contemptuous of her, and her
culture. Jason even argues that he has saved her from "living among
barbarians" and has taught her "how to live by law instead of sweet
will of force" (17). His steadfast belief that he has done her a favor
by tearing her from her home rankles an audience sympathetic to
Medea's plight. He feels that she is a charity case he has helped to
enlighten, similar to the missionaries attitudes towards Native
Americans, Medea is considered to come from an inferior culture and in
need of a good dose of civilization. Nationalism, on the part of the
Greeks is shown at its worst. Such blunt statements force the audience
to realize the absurdity of such a blind love for ones own country.
However, at the same time that Euripides points this out he also uses
the sympathy of the towns women to illustrate the importance of having
a place of belonging, a native land is essential and they cry that "...
There is no sorrow above the loss of a native land." (21). Nationalism
is not all bad, and the love for ones own country is also something
that should not be easily put aside.
Medea, a smart, courageous woman is judged to be barbaric because
of her country. As a woman, the men of power feel threatened by her
and, therefore, fear her for her cleverness. Though Jason continues to
argue that in Greece Medea is honored for her intelligence "while, if
[she] were living at the ends of the earth nobody would have heard of
[her]" (18); Medea, who is indeed very clever and perceptive, sees
that "...for being clever [she] find[s] that some will envy [her],
others object to [her]." (10) Her perception of herself, her identity,
is still that of an outsider. She is estranged by her unusual customs
and marginalized by the society that cannot accept her as an empowered
woman. Her hatred of her husband and his betrayal is all the more
intensified because of these conditions. Her husband was the one link
that held her into this society, and yet it is the same society that
makes it acceptable for him to leave her on a whim. Her frustration
with being beaten down from her potential and to her rage so that she
wishes not only to hurt her husband but to impress upon his society
her power. She knows herself to be smart and powerful- capable and
independent, and she wants her final act to prove this to the citizens
that they may never again think less of her than she sees in herself.
While the play, Medea, does not expressly show themes of sexism or
xenophobia, it shows a time period & a culture where these themes were
accepted, and men were considered greater than women. The title
character, Medea, was cheated on by her husband, who decided to marry
a new wife who was "better." However, her husband, Jason, saw no
wrong in this. He believed he was doing his children a favor, as his
new wife was royalty. The way Jason treats Medea is very sexist, but
he only sees it as normal.
Creon, the king of Corinth, decides to banish Medea from his land.
Some may see this as sexist, but he does this out of concern for his
and his people's safety. He does not banish Medea because she is a
woman, but because she was being violent, outspoken, and threatening.
The only character who could be considered sexist in this play is
Jason.
Many men in Medea say that she is smart, clever, skilled, etc. They
would not be saying these things if they truly thought that Medea was
just an inferior woman. However, Medea herself says:
"Of all things which are living and can form a judgment
We women are the most unfortunate creatures.
Firstly, with an excess of wealth it is required
For us to buy a husband and take for our bodies
A master; for not to take one is even worse." (8)
She is talking about how unfair marriages are for women, and how men
can just do whatever they please. This further illustrates how sexism
was accepted in their culture.
The only example of xenophobia is very minor. It is when Jason says
Medea used to live among barbarians in her homeland. This shows that
he considered the place Medea was from to be inferior to Greece, and
with the term "barbarian" it shows he could be a little scared of
them.
In response to Michael's position, I agree with most of it. He makes
many of the points that I did, and a few that I didn't. I like how he
went more in-depth about the themes of xenophobia in the play than I
did. Also, he references other Greek stories at the beginning of his,
and says how Medea is different.
Michael also mentions how Jason is stereotypical. I agree with parts
of this. I don't believe he saw Medea as a "weak, defenseless woman."
After all, he has said that she is intelligent. However, I do believe
she wouldn't do anything as extreme as she did. Also, I think he only
saw her as partly replaceable. He didn't want to sever all ties with
her - he pretty much wanted her to stay and be his mistress. I believe
he still had some feelings for her, but socially & politically,
marrying the princess was a better choice. He mentions how he was
making their children kings; I believe he really meant to do that, and
that was one of the reasons behind this new marriage.
The culture of ancient Greece, while thriving, had many people whom
were xenophobic and sexist. As a male dominated society, many stories
would revolve of how the hero is a man. Euripides, a Greek writer of
tragedies who writes Medea, changes it up a bit. The main character is
a woman, and while the Greek society may be xenophobic and sexist, the
text does not perpetuate xenophobia, and challenges sexism to a small
degree.
While Medea is an outsider, there weren't any extreme signs of fear
or hatred toward her, merely because she was a foreigner from Colchis.
She may have been insulted several times by her own husband- Jason;
her and her people being called "barbarians." Though it is insulting,
it merely shows people like Jason see their society as more "superior
and advanced." It does not really warrant the description of
xenophobic.
After all, if Jason had been xenophobic, why would he choose to marry
Medea? His hatred or fear would have kept him away; obviously he was
able to overlook the "barbaric Medea." Creon, the King of Corinth, has
her exiled out of fear she may do something - as Jason is marrying his
daughter. He does not banish her just because she is foreign.
There is sexism, but not a very extreme case of it; it was how the
time period was. Even though Medea is a woman, Aegus, Creon, and even
Jason look past that and tell her often she is "clever," or
"intelligent." The characters may have not displayed sexism directly,
but it can clearly be seen when Medea states her reasons for
vengeance. She instead speaks of how sexist the society can be how a
woman can only sit back and watch her husband be with other woman and
she is to stay at home and endure it all.
Jason is the most prominent character that be said as being "sexist."
He sees her nothing as a woman - that is replaceable - as he has moved
on to Creon's daughter. Jason is the stereotypical male who sees his
wife Medea was a weak, defenseless woman who will just sit back and
endure it all. But, because of his stereotypical and sexist views, he
does not expect that Medea will do a thing; unlike King Creon.
Jason's sexist views eventually lead to the death of his children, new
wife and Creon.
Gabe makes some interesting points and I'm glad that I am not the
only one who sees the lack of xenophobia and that Jason was mainly the
sexist. However, I don't really believe Jason was acting in best
interests for his children. If he had really cared about his children
why does he neglect them? Surely a bond between a father and his
children is much more important than a position in the royal family.
The man was just trying to cover himself.
Even though men like Creon and Jason accepted Medea's intelligence,
they still saw her as a woman and kept their sexist views about her.
The prime culprit of this was Jason. He really did not think she was
going to do a thing because he saw her as a stereotypical woman.
On Aug 19, 6:48 pm, rosie_m...@yahoo.com wrote:
Instead Medea remains consistent with the ideal of the time; women
were lower on the social hierarchy than men. This isn't sexism but
instead just false mental programming. Not limited to Grecian ideas,
male superiority was a dominating thought of the era. Furthermore,
sexism or xenophobia is not to blame when Jason takes another wife; a
lack of morals and a lack of compassion is the root problem. Jason
felt a right to flex his male superiority and hoped that Medea would
just understand, a fault that would be fatal to him.
Xenophobia is present in the secondary character's reactions toward
Medea. They consider her to be "barbaric" and inferior. It's this
blunt generalization that evokes xenophobia.
Rosie's reader response provides a coherent and different
interpretation of the book. It shows Medea as a victim of a
patriarchal society with no solution other than to murder. Rosie was
also show aspects of racism shown throughout the book that I missed or
could not see. A fierce nationalism and evidence of spite towards a
smart barbaric woman was missed on my part and I thank Rosie for
providing me with such insight.
The play Medea by Euripides represents four concepts which occur in
various ways throughout. They are gender, ethnicity, patriarchy, and
nationalism. Gender is represented by women's inferiority to men, and
Medea, who is the main character, experiences this defamation which
during this time period was not uncommon. As for ethnicity, Medea was
not Greek, and Jason, her husband, refers to this in an effort to
console her. Finally, patriarchy and nationalism. Patriarchy is
displayed through Medea's husband. As for nationalism many of the
characters have a pride for the country from which they come. In her
despair, Medea gives an accurate description of what life is like for
a woman. "We woman are the most unfortunate creatures. With an excess
of wealth it is required for us to buy a husband. Nor can she say no
to her marriage. How best to manage him who shares the bed with
her" (9). When Medea gives the description of what life is like for a
woman, she explains how hard it is for a woman to live with her
husband. How the woman will need some amount of control over her male
companion in order to be content. Also, how women are devoted to one
man while men may flaunt their desire to whomever they wish. Women
also tend to be more sensitive than men, and much of Medea's complaint
is based off of her fragile emotions that any other woman may feel
sympathy for, but not every man would be considerate towards. When
Jason himself confront Medea, he reiterates the past of their meeting
together. He states that Medea saving him was an act of love. In this,
Jason thinks he gave more to her than she gave to him by taking her
from a "barbaric" land. He says the following: "'Firstly, instead of
living among barbarians, you inhabit a Greek land and understand our
ways, how to live by law instead of the sweet will of force. And all
the Greeks considered you a clever women. You were honored for it;
while, if you were living at the ends of the earth, nobody would have
heard of you'" (17,18). Here Medea's ethnicity is mentioned. Or
perhaps what Jason "believes" is her ethnicity. From what is quoted it
is easy to infer that Medea comes from a far off land, or a
civilization not as well known as the Greeks. Because Medea's
ethnicity is not well known, she is something of a philistine, and
inferior to those who live in the city of Corinth.
Jason represent the idea of patriarchy in the play. It's known at the
moment in which Jason confronts his wife, Medea, trying to explain his
reasoning for betrayal. He professes the following: "'...it was not
because of a woman I made the royal alliance in which I now live, but,
as I said before, I wished to preserve you and breed a royal progeny
to be brothers to the children I have now, a sure defense to
us'" (19). This statement is the display of patriarchy. It seems
likely that the talk of "strengthening the lineage" is just a lie to
calm Medea down; that in reality Jason may have ended up abandoning
his first wife to gain higher status and appreciation in society.
However, it is obvious lineage plays an important role nonetheless by
determining respect, and Jason had described himself as exile and
thought himself lucky to be able to marry someone with great power.
Finally, nationalism. Many of the characters in Medea have a patriotic
appeal to the country in which they come from. Not only that, but
where families reside as well. Medea expresses a kind of nostalgic
feeling for here home country when she says: "O my country! How
bitterly now I remember you!" (11). Medea exclaims this when she
learns of her exile. Now she has nowhere to go, and nobody to comfort
her . She is both an exile of Corinth, and of her home country, and
she did not realize how horrible it is to be exiled from a place where
your family and people you know reside. After Medea says this, king
Creon says how he loves his country as well, and that is why he wants
Medea to leave. The characters are big on where they come from, and
what they represent. Overall, Medea falls quite easily into her
stereotype of a woman, and Jason falling into the stereotype of a
patriarch. Both contribute to ethnicity and nationalism, especially
Medea who mentions her home frequently. Many of the characters seem to
take pride in the most petty aspects of a person, and each of them
play the role of their stereotype well. Overall, each of the concepts
of gender, ethnicity, patriarchy, and nationalism, helps in adding
depth to Euripides work.
Medea, the unstable, yet aggressive main character in Euripides,
Medea, was a woman who was married to Jason, a tactless man. Medea had
saved Jason's life, she made sure that everyone knew this, and often
reminded Jason. She also had two children and was a common housewife,
until Jason left her for a princess, daughter of the King, Creon.
Medea was extremely distraught by this news and could not seem to
overcome it. Medea thought that Jason did not love her anymore and she
hated him for it, she felt like she had done everything for him. Medea
had such a great love for Jason and he had trampled all over her
heart.
As a woman, Medea was expected to just overcome this hardship,
and move on with her life, but Medea was a different kind of woman.
She would not stand back and watch Jason ruin her life, she would not
leave peacefully as Creon had asked, and she definitely would not
watch Jason marry the new princess. She had to make them all pay for
her distress. This novel suggests that patriarchy is highly regarded,
that men could do anything they wanted without any consequences, but
Medea did not believe this to be true.
Despite the fact that Medea was a woman, she was very strong-
willed. She was expected to be quiet and not complain about her
marriage, but she was stubborn and did not care that she was a woman,
she acted the same way a man would, but perhaps with more force. There
were no gender-boundaries for her like there were to the rest of the
people in this novel. I think that Medea acted strongly because people
expected her not to be, and she wanted to prove them that she could be
strong, by doing things like poisoning and killing people, even her
own children. Medea even says that, "women, though most helpless in
doing good deeds, Are of every evil the cleverest of contrivers" (14).
Medea shows that women can be just as evil as men are.
This novel also shows much nationalism throughout the separate
countries. As Medea was planning to kill Creon and the princess, she
knew she had to find somewhere else to live because she knew that
after she killed them, the people of Corinth would come after her and
kill her as well. Medea spoke to Aegeus and made him vow that "[he
would] never cast [her] from [his] land, Nor, if any of [her] enemies
should demand [her], [Would Aegus], in [his] life, willingly hand
[her] over" (24). Of course, he accepted this and swore, "by the
Earth, by the holy light of Helius, By all the gods" (24), that he
would protect her. Medea knew that the people of Corinth were so
devoted to their king and country that they would come after her and
try to kill her.
Medea is a play that was probably unique for its time. For thousands
of years, and even now in a lot of cultures, women are not seen to be
on the same level as men. Sexism has been widely accepted until very
recently. In the play, Medea is outraged when she finds out that her
husband, Jason, is deserting her for a Princess, the daughter of King
Creon. She feels she has been discriminated against not only because
she is a woman and has lower status compared to the Princess, but also
because she is an outsider. She is seen as a barbarian by her
neighbors and by Jason himself.
Nationalism is common. People are always suspicious of outsiders,
because they are unfamiliar with them and fear the unknown. When
Creon exiles Medea, she really has nowhere to go because she will not
be truly accepted by other nations. Aegeus invites her to his land if
she can make it on her own, because he "'does not wish to incur blame
from [his] friends'" (24). This shows that other countries are
reluctant to take in Medea. The only thing on her mind is revenge,
and she succeeds. Her poisoned gifts kill the Princess, and she
"saves" her children by killing them. Medea's actions are horrifying
to Jason, who feels much pain.
For that time period, sexism was considered okay. A woman truly
standing up for herself was unheard of. Medea goes against the
general ideas of her society, and the rulers of nations have taken
notice of this. I think that Medea would have been more welcomed by
other places if she had not built up her reputation as a strong
woman. It was normal for females to be submissive in that era. Creon
feared that she might do something horrible if he let her stay in
Greece, because he was aware of her intelligence and the fact that her
behavior was the opposite of most women.
Medea's actions were a result of her society. She wanted to show how
disgusted she was with her treatment. Nowadays, Jason would have been
criticized for deserting his family for a woman of higher status.
People did not think that way back then, and Medea was ahead of her
time.
In Euripides Medea, the character Medea demonstrates qualities
opposite of the common woman role for the time period. After bieng
left by her husband, Medea take a role of revenge toward her husband
and children. SHe turns agains the common genter and ethnic roled of
her people. For example, women are typically given the role of caring
for the children, however Medea killer them in anger towards her
husband. The text shows views in favor of patriarchy and
nationalism. They portray the deeds of Medea that would be against
these two ideas as radical and wrong. The text does not show sympathy
to Medea's dilemas and trials, however it portrays her as idiotic and
insane. They show Jason, Medea's former husband, as calm and rational
and as a positive man with good intentions. As a reader, I lfelt bad
for Medea's condition and the grief she felt, bu I also found her
tactics to be very extreme and unnecessary. At the same time I felt
bad for Jason because he did not mean harm and was punished cruely by
Medea.
The text also talks positively toward nationalism. The fact
that Meda was asked to leave her town shown nationalism among the
people there who required her to leave. Also mentioned was the fact
that Medea would have trouble finding another nation to be accepted
among. It seemed that everyone had a specific town that they belonged
to. Being asked to leave showed that she no longer belong with the
beliefs and characteristics of her region. She would have to find
another civilization that would accept her, which sounded difficult to
do.
Medea is very ostracized throughout the book. Her actions set
her apart from the other members of her town, and rightfully so. She
did not act in a proper way, and her actions were cruel, unusual, and
unnecessary. However, I still find it hard not to sympathize with her
in any way. Medea was an emotional character who let her emotions
take over her life.
Euripides' Medea is one of very few works that first brought up social
issues like xenophobia and sexism that are still heavily discussed
today. Even in the time of the Ancient Greeks, women have been seen
as second-class citizens but in this play, the title-character, Medea,
made the decision to finally break free from the patriarchal society
that had left her wronged, infuriated, and hungry for revenge. After
years of undying love and have born children to him, Jason completely
betrays the promises he made to Medea when they wedded and chooses to
marry the king of Corinth's daughter. Finding this out was horrible in
more ways than one to Medea and she chose to gain revenge by not only
ruthlessly killing Jason's new bride but also, her own children in the
process of doing so; "when once she is wronged in the matter of love,
No other soul can hold so many thoughts of blood" (9).
It is clear to see that women's abilities were undermined, "Of all
things that are living and can form a judgment we women are the most
unfortunate creatures" (9) and men felt that repercussions will not
come to them even after poor decisions. Jason never stopped to
consider how him remarrying another could affect his children and
Medea, but once called a "coward in every way" (15), with his ego
wounded, he begins to back track and offers to help her before she
goes into exile, believing this would make things right. Euripides
plays off of the undermining of women and has allows Medea to be aware
that not only can she use emotions to her advantage but she also very
witty and clever. Though how she used her abilities in a rather
extreme action, she did what she felt was best and did not want to be
taken advantage of anymore. Her anger and hatred directed to Jason
can be used a metaphor of how women's oppression under men can not be
tolerated and will not go unsettled.
Along with sexism and women oppression, xenophobia is another subtle
reason to what made Medea finally break, "there is no sorrow above the
loss of a native land" (21). She had become looked down upon because
she left her home country to marry Jason, later explained by saying
that he ultimately did her a favor because in Greece, she would be
"honored by her cleverness" (17). But even in Corinth , she was seen
as "barbaric" and the Creon even saw it acceptable to exile her with
prior knowledge that she had no where else to go. Ancient Greeks took
great pride in their own "city-states" and did not want to unblemished
the image that they have built up, if one bad seed infiltrates, they
have to get it out fast.
As I read Rosie's response, I agreed with virtually all points that
she made. She mentioned that "men of power feel threatened by her"
and that is very reasonable and shown when the King decides to exile
her, "I greatly dread that you are plotting some evil" (11). Her
comparison of Jason taking Medea to Greece and what settles did to
Native Americans was a very interesting metaphor choice that made
sense.
Medea is a work ahead of its time and its subject matter has been an
eyebrow raiser for centuries. What readers get out of this ability
that revenge has to bring out the dark in some people. Many find
Medea's actions understandable and just, a little overkill but right,
others are appalled by the thought of a mother killing children; but
people cannot act like things like this have not happened in this day
and age. It is important for women and anyone estranged by their
society to speak out and do what
Euripides' Medea takes place in ancient Greek, which was a male
dominated society. When Euripides wrote this play, women were not
typically the protagonist, which was why it created such a
controversy. The play itself doesn't express sexism opinions, but
simply takes place in a society where women had lower status.
Xenophobia is also expressed in this play, but it appears as more of a
stereotype towards Medea's homeland rather than an actual fear of
outsiders.
The actual conflict in Medea occurs when Jason, Medea's husband
decides to marry the princess of Corinth in hopes of bettering himself
in society. What he fails to recognize is his wife sacrifice in order
to be with him. Medea left her home, family, and gave up everything
to be with Jason and now she feels betrayed and humiliated. Jason,
thinking Medea is just an ordinary woman, fails to think twice about
his actions and the repercussions they will bring.
Medea's revenge on Jason and the royal family would be considered an
unforgivable crime in today's society, but in ancient society, this
type of revenge was unheard of. This is where sexism can be seen in
the ancient society, because they failed to recognize women as being
capable of such plans. Even though they suspected Medea of planning
something, they still were confident that she wouldn't go through with
it. Medea's extreme rage comes from the lack of appreciation of the
sacrifice she made for Jason. Jason is not only sexist, in the way he
disrespects his wife, but also selfish. His decision to marry another
woman was based on the chance that he would be king someday. He even
offers Medea the spoils of being king, assuming she will be happy
about it and just accept his bribe. It is understandable why Jason
thinks that marrying a girl to become king is a good plan, but he
should have thought of it before he met Medea. Medea is faced with
the hardships of being an outsider in a foreign land where she is
unfamiliar with people. Even though Medea was put through so much,
her actions of revenge were completely out of line. Perhaps if she
had somewhere to go, things might have turned out different, but for
her, that was the only way out.
I agree with Sam's interpretation of Medea because it gives a simple
yet sophisticated outlook on Medea's situation. At the time the play
was written, women did have a lower status than men, but it was
Jason's inconsideration towards his wife that really sparked the
problem. However, if being a "barbaric" was the stereotype she faced,
then didn't she only prove them right with her actions? It is hard to
feel sorry for either of the characters, but the revenge Medea took
upon Jason certainly didn't match the crime.
The darkest fears of men can be powerful weapons in the hands of one
with the motivation to use them. Medea, the protagonist of Euripides'
play of the same name is the prime example of this. Xenophobia and
sexism make her appear inferior in the eyes of her newfound
countrymen, and she uses this greatly to her advantage.
Medea is the incarnation of the an old adage- 'Hell hath no fury like
a woman scorned." Furious at her husband's betrayal, especially given
the sacrifice she has made for him, Medea plots to wreak her terrible
revenge. However, it is difficult to take revenge on one who knows
how dangerous their foe can be. So, how does Medea hide her
intentions? She uses the very minds of her enemies. The play shows a
definite xenophobia which afflicts much of the general populace.
However, due to her descent, Medea is seen as a barbarian, one of
slight intelligence. If the play did not perpetuate this viewpoint,
Medea's plan would be unable to succeed, as she would be held suspect
as to her motives without this veil. Additionally, the play continues
the view of women as the inferior sex. Weaker, less cunning, neither
sounds like a description of a killer. Behind yet another wall of
illusion, Medea seems assured of victory. However, the views
expressed by the play are not merely an implicit statement. Medea
herself actively maintains her veils. For example, when she first
devises her vengeance, Medea speaks with her husband. During this
conversation, she drops her strength and her will in order to seem the
part of an obedient housewife. In this way, she assuages Jason's
fears of her scheme. The sexist viewpoint does not, however, end
there. Medea even goes so far as to prey on the stereotypical
behavior of other women, such as the princess. Medea knows that, as a
woman, the princess will be excited by her gifts and thus succumb to
the poison. Again, the play has shown a very sexist point of view.
However, there are some points where one might confuse the play's
point of view.
Some may argue that the play does not perpetuate the aforementioned
stereotypes, but, rather, that these views are challenged. One point
some may argue is the very nature of Medea herself. She is scheming
and conniving, strong-willed and forceful. Almost the exact opposite
of what a woman is expected to be in the time of Medea. However, the
inner thoughts are not what defines a stereotype. Rather, it is the
conduct of an individual that ultimately decides whether or not that
individual fit's the mold. Medea may be strong in her mind, but she
acts in such a way as to fit the role that is expected of her. Some
may bring up the point that Jason took Medea, a foreigner, to be his
wife as a challenge to the play's xenophobic motif. This is also
incorrect. Jason, after a time, grows bored with Medea, thus creating
the story's conflict. Additionally, the Corinthian women absolutely
love to gossip about the "barbarian."
In the end, the play Medea only serves to perpetuate the xenophobia
and sexism that existed at the time of its production. These themes
are not only implied, but actively maintained by the titular
character. Though an intriguing read, Medea fails to free itself from
the conventional thinking of its time.
Euripides does an interesting job of balancing xenophobia and sexism.
Though both are clearly present in "Medea," neither is a prominent
theme or overriding message in the story. An excellent example of
xenophobia would be the calling of Medea and the people from her
homeland "barbarians". However; in this time period, thinking that
any culture other than their own was barbaric was a common belief of
many. Consider the conflict between the Trojans and the Greeks in The
Iliad, for instance. It would not be correct to refer to Jason's
contempt for Medea and her people as xenophobia, because while by
today's standards it would be fitting to label his behavior as
xenophobic; in ancient Greece, it was commonplace.
In other stories similar to Medea, the hero of the story is almost
always male. So upon knowing the protagonist is, in fact, female;
the assumption will be that she is made to feel inferior, that in the
hierarchy of her culture, she is nowhere near the top. But arguably
in Medea, the level of sexism is low. This issue relates directly to
the xenophobia issue in that by today's standards, the men in "Medea,"
especially Jason, are sexist. Yet considering women's roles in
society in ancient Greece, one would realize Medea was not treated any
worse than what was expected. Besides his condescending attitude
towards Medea, Jason's betrayal of her by leaving her for Glauce is
argued by some as sexist. However, this act was not in itself
sexist. Jason accepted Creon's offer of his daughter with no thought
for Medea of course, and with his own best interest at mind. Yet this
decision was not sexist. This decision, much like the illustrations
of supposed xenophobia, were nothing out of the ordinary back then.
Yet even in this day and age, when a man leaves his wife for another
woman, would it be considered sexist? While this was a hurtful
action, it can hardly be considered sexist.
The example that brings xenophobia and sexism together would be the
exile of Medea. This, however, further proves that neither Creon nor
Jason are exceptionally xenophobic and/or sexist. Medea was exiled
because of violent behavior, in her jealousy of Glauce and anger
towards Jason. Creon exiled Medea out of fear of safety for himself,
his daughter, and his people. Banishing her was a practical decision
he felt compelled to make, and cannot be taken as xenophobia or
sexism. If Medea had been from Corinth, and even if she had been a
man, Creon would still have exiled her out of fear for security.
The ancient Greeks were known to be proud of their nationalism, and
"Medea" illustrates it well. There is a fine line between nationalism
and xenophobia, and the Corinthians walk it carefully. As previously
stated, the reference to Medea and her people as barbarians can be
effortlessly described as nationalist views. While it may seem like
extreme nationalism in today's society, it was simply pride in their
country to them, which the core of the definition of nationalism.
Even in today's society, offending other cultures and labeling it
nationalism is common. And while the Greeks were often violent in
their nationalist beliefs, it was not based on fear of others so much
as it was based on their own pride and ambition, or simple revenge.
So while some of the themes and events in "Medea" could be seen as
xenophobic or sexist by today's standards, Euripedes was clearly
showing the nationalism of the Greeks and accurately portraying their
ethos. The actions taken by the characters, especially Jason and
Creon, were not xenophobic or sexist, and cannot be interpreted as
such. Considering setting is key while reading literature, and once
done, the reader can easily agree that events in "Medea" were typical
examples of nationalism and hierarchy, and not telling of xenophobia
or sexism.
However, when viewed as a whole, the play portrays both genders with
their share of character flaws and virtues and challenges stereotypes,
particularly the presumed inferiority of women, which leads to
treatment that begets violence and widespread misery. Medea is not
alone in bad behavior. Jason displays infidelity to his wife, lack of
concern for his children, and dishonesty about his motives for
remarrying. He breaks his marriage vow, and leaves his wife who has
endured broad spectrum sacrifice for his sake, to take up with a
younger "virgin" (44) woman. Jason neglects his children. He claims
that he only had Medea's "best interests" (18) in mind when he
abandoned her and married the princess. Both the nurse and the
townswomen display an awareness of the evil nature of Medea's answer
to her jilting. The townswomen ask the god to stop Medea: "O heavenly
light hold back her hand." (40). King Aegeus sympathizes with Medea's
grief and also understands that an oath before the gods is solemn and
punishable by death which he refers to as "what comes to those who
have no regard for heaven" (25).
I do not believe that Medea promotes fear of foreigners since there
are not enough characters to draw a generalization about non-Greeks.
Indeed, Medea has let her heartbreak rip herself up and seeks brutal
vengeance, but she is only one person.
I appreciated Rosie pointing out that women at the time were limited
to emotional power and had other avenues been available to her, Medea
may have found a more peaceful solution. I think of war torn
countries where revolutionaries in the minority resort to terrorism as
a means of addressing injustices as they perceive this method as the
only avenue attracting sufficient attention to their cause..
On Aug 20, 3:00 am, Gabe <aurace1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > that they may never again think less of her than she sees in herself.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
The character of Medea was marginalized by both the
patriarchal society of ancient Greece, and through a set of inflexible
laws, within the parameter of nationalism. It essentially held women
powerless within that society. In order to understand Euripides'
tragic play, we need to examine it within the historical context of
women in ancient Greece. The woman's role was that of a nurturer,
although she added to the financial security of the home by producing
textiles, and performing burial rights. Her main function was to bear
children and tend to the home. This was a lonely task, often performed
while men went off to war.
Medea was abandoned twice, first by Jason, then by her homeland. The
later was of her choosing. She kills her brother, to help Jason gain
safe passage home, after acquiring the Golden Fleece. Then, she
abandons her father and her home, knowing she can never return. Medea
understands this mistake too late. Within the Greek culture, family is
everything, and murdering one's family would never be tolerated, no
matter how much passion one felt. That act of betrayal foreshadows
Medea's downfall. "I betrayed my father and my house" (16). Medea will
have to live with the choice she has made, "we women are the most
unfortunate creatures" (8). When a woman makes a poor choice in
marriage, "there is no escape" (8).
The gender issue comes into play here, because a woman's fate is
sealed with marriage, while "a man when he's tired of his house, puts
an end to his boredom" (9). Jason leaves Medea for a new wife. It is
Medea who must "keep her eyes on one alone" (9). When Jason marries
the princess of Corinth, King Creon's daughter, who is a more
advantageous partner than a foreigner, Medea feels betrayed. She has
obeyed her vows, while Jason walks away from his. "The husband lives
with us and lightly bears his yolk" (9). Medea, furthermore, is not
allowed to express her pain through insulting Jason, that is, without
facing exile. Creon tells Medea that she is, "clever, versed in the
evil arts" (10). She replies, "some envy me, some reject me, for all
my cleverness" (10).
It is evident that Medea's pride, cleverness, and outspoken nature,
are frowned on as traits in women, but admired in men. Women are to be
seen but not heard from. Jason warns her, "you inhabit Greek land,
understand our ways, how to live by the law" (17). Greek laws always
take precedence over the individual's will. Morally, by the God's
decrees, Jason is an adulterer, but in the end, the state has supreme
power.
Jason, too, recognizes Medea's powerlessness within their marriage.
He tells Medea, "I wished to preserve you and breed a royal progeny to
be brothers" (19). Jason feels Medea should welcome such a fortune,
not curse it. She is making his, as well as her own, life miserable.
Jason wants the benefits of marriage, without the inconvenience, "it
would be better if women didn't exist, life would be good" (18). This
statement shows Jason's arrogance where women are concerned.
Consequently, for Medea, her fate was sealed, as both a foreign wife,
and an independent woman. Just as Athena, the patron deity of Athens,
rejects marriage, so too, does Medea. Medea realizes that her
obligation to bear children carries with it overwhelming restraints,
not to mention, a reminder of a soured marriage. She states, "I'd
rather stand three times in front of battle that to bear one
child" (9). She, furthermore, questions why the gods make women bear
children to begin with, when they bring so much pain, "vain waste your
care of children" (41).
Later, when the nurse tries to intercede on behalf of the children,
telling Medea they are not responsible for their father's sins, Medea
refuses to listen to reason. She knows her children will be looked
down on by society, "my children, there is no one who can give them
safety" (26). Medea knows the murder she is contemplating is wrong, "I
weep to think of what a deed I have to do" (26). She knows she can not
take the children into exile with her, "I have no land, no home, and
no refuge for my pain" (26). For Medea, there is no way out, forcing
her to commit the unthinkable act for a Greek woman, the murder of her
children. Medea does not take this act lightly, "this is the most
terrible grief of all" (36). Medea knows her children, like herself,
will be ridiculed a far worse fate, "for it is not bearable to be
mocked by my enemies" (26).
Like many women in the same situation, Medea's reasoning starts to
spiral into madness, "the gods and I, in a kind of madness, have
contrived all this" (33). Medea's love for Jason has turned diseased;
her hatred turned to rage. Her thinking becomes impaired, and she
turns that rage toward her children, as well. They have become pawns
in the marriage, "she turns from her children and doesn't like to see
them" (2). Medea views Jason as a coward, "O coward in every way, that
is what I call you" (15). She knows Jason does not care about his
children. If he has married behind her back, what else is her capable
of? Medea blames Jason for the fate of the children. Jason blames
Medea, "O children, what a wicked mother she was to you! (44)"
The final act of Medea's despair is revenge. She loves her children,
but hates Jason more, "I loved them and killed them to make you feel
pain" (46). We understand Medea's pain stems from not wanting them to
be ostracized. It is a painful decision based on alternatives that are
too hard to bear. They are better off dead, "I wish you luck, but not
in this world" (35). The tragedy is in believing there is no way out
of one's misery. Medea knows that she will have the upper hand by
destroying not only the children, but Jason's bride, Clauce as well.
Medea becomes the avenger of evil, Jason the tragic victim of his own
arrogance and ambition. If Medea were a modern day story, she might be
compared to Andrea Yates, who drowned her five children in the
bathtub, striving to live up to the ideal of perfection as a wife and
a mother.
On Jul 17, 12:13 pm, Charles.Weinb...@gmail.com wrote:
> The prompt for Medea has been altered to suit the purposes of this
> discussion board. You are still required to argue whether or not the
> text perpetuates xenophobia (fear of outsiders) and sexism or
> challenges it. However, besides stating your argument, you must also
> provide a comment on or rebuttal to another student's post. This
> should require approximately one page of typed, single-spaced text.
After reading this play, I am intrigued at the ways in which Euripides
plays around with concepts of gender and ethnicity. One of the many
things I noticed from the beginning was the way he danced around the
understood status role of women. The Nurse, Tuitor, and Chorus of
Women raved on and on about Medea's emotional status because of her
tainted marriage. The fact that these characters consistently
emphasized the issue of marriage gave me certain impressions. I,
myself, think that marriage and wedding vows are a big deal. However,
the Nurse and Chorus of Women made it seem as if these things in
itself were Medea's core of existence; as if loyalty to her "husband's
bed" and children were her very life, and all she could ever imagine
living for! In fact, Medea herself even says she's met her end. Her
life was over! The fact that Medea was a women and a mother only
intensified the gravity of what she does at the end of the play. It's
amazing and terrifying all at once. It's amazing to me because on page
8, Medea tells the women that women are the most unfortunate creatures
on earth because they're expected to take on a husband as "master"
over their bodies. Women were illustrated as weak, feeble creatures,
bound to house and home, dependent on their husbands. Yet, amazingly,
Medea's rage breaks all limiting bonds of womanhood and motherly
duties! Instead of just excepting her disgrace, obeying the King's
orders, and raising her children as expected, she seeks vengeance!
In addition, Euripides seems use Medea's ethnic background to further
explain her cruel, fatal actions. After realizing the tragic state he
was in, Jason brings up the fact that Medea is from Colchis; that
she's not Greek. After awhile, I began to translate Jason's use of the
term "Greek" to mean "civilized". After all, Medea told Jason she
believed the reason why he betrayed her was partially because, after
being home for awhile, he felt ashamed to have married a foreign
woman. It kind of gives a sense that Medea wasn't truly welcome long
before she began speaking out against Creon and his court. Once Jason
discovered the fate of his children he mentions that he brought her
from a foreign home to a Greek house; as if he did some huge favor for
her or something. Then he says she killed the kids for "the sake of
pleasure in bed", which I found to be interesting because it was like
saying foreigners are so uncivilized that their women, although they
way be wives, are really just whore who would do anything for pleasure
from their husbands. Clearly, not only did Euripides create Medea's
character as that of a woman, (which was low in itself), but he
combines it with the bitter dislike of a Colchis native, thus making
Medea the ultimate monster. Like Jason said, "There is no Greek( or
"civilized") woman who would have dared such deeds".
By analyzing Medea's character and the ways in which she was
portrayed, I've come to the conclusion that patriarchy and nationalism
was a big deal to Euripides. Medea, as I said before, spoke for all
women when she described the unfortunate factors that made women the
most unfortunate beings alive. Her entire speech could be easily
summarized by saying, "Men rule the world! Women are but the servants
of men". But I think Jason gets the idea across best when he very
passionately declares that the creation of women was a tragic mistake.
He went as far as to say it would've been better if children came into
the world in any other form other that via a woman's body. That's a
deep, deep thing to say. And, again, there was never a moment that
went by that Jason didn't make sure everyone remembered Medea wasn't
Greek. He gave a clear message that Greeks were the dominant culture,
displaying nationalism throughout the play.
On Sep 3, 2:36 pm, destiny woods <heavenly_kisse...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
In response to to what Anna wrote, I agree with what she had to
say. Most of what she had to say I had said as well. I like how she
articulates the little amount of influence women had at the time. I
also like the fact that Anna includes information concerning women and
their fathers. She states that while a women wasn't married, she
looked up to her father as the "head" or dominant force in her life.
The father had rule over the woman as long as she remained single. I
think this was good information that she included because it helps to
better illustrate the fact that a woman lived her entire life under
the oppressive thumb of a male. So while the play focuses on marriage
and the social connection between a woman and her husband, Anna's
writing shows that the status of women at the time of Euripides was
low for any female from the time of birth until death. Weakness was a
label that followed all women. Lastily, I appreciate and agree with
what she had to say about Medea's character in connection to her
betrayal towards her father's house and homeland. Madea's actions
concerning the matter definitely makes her seem much more monstrous
then before.
A classic example of a tragic hero, Medea is in the spotlight as she
endures numerous ordeals,
each one more traumatic than the previous. However, of all the things
she has suffered, none
of it was endorsed, including Xenophobia and sexism. Euripides
cleverly constructed the syntax
to focus on the injustices that Medea had to go through in a third
person point of view, as if the
reader among the 3rd person narrator were helplessly watching as
things unraveled and quickly
spiraled downwards into the inevitable tragedy. This is clearly done
to invoke specific emotions
from the reader, including sympathy toward Medea and outrage at the
causes of her misfortunes.
Xenophobia is apparent in the story, but portrayed in a light that
shows how harmfulit can be,
in the case of her husband commenting on her people being barbarians.
The same is done with sexism, when Medea lamented on her helplessness
due to being born
a woman and denied an opportunity to follow her ambitions. Especially
noteworthy were some
of the things she said about being a wife, including "of all things
which are living
and can form a judgement... women are the most unfortunate
creatures," (8) and "because all their wealth goes into buying a
husband
and "take for [their] bodies a master; for not to take one is even
worse"(8). These passages are obviously there for ethos, that is, they
are there solely for
the purpose of bringing to light how different men and women were in
her society. From her
lamenting tone, it is then implied that Medea refuses to accept her
fate as a woman, and decides
to break all ties with this culture she has learned to despise.
However, she must first cut the bonds
that tie her to her husband before she can reconcile with herself and
move on. Those bonds are
the children she bore him, proven by his own actions, as he was more
concerned about the children
than his wife. And so, driven by grief and backed into a corner, Medea
severs the bonds and tries to
come to terms with her actions.
In response to Rosie
While there are certain elements in the play portraying Medea as a
strong and intelligent heroine
who was destined for tragedy due to factors outside her control, there
is more to it than just that.
Medea is not just a victim, as she partly brought all of this onto
herself. One must take into account
the time when this play was written. It was no secret back then that
women had fewer rights than men,
and Medea should have been aware of that in the beginning. Also, after
carefully re-reading the story, it
seems that Jason never really loved Medea, and in fact used her to his
advantage. Feeling guilty for what
he had done, and against his better judgment, he brought Medea with
him.
Again, who would truly feel comfortable with a woman who killed her
family for her fanatical "love" for a person? Her impulsive and
psychotic behavior when it came to her devotion
for Jason should have been enough of a warning sign. In a way, Medea
herself was a punishment from the gods
to Jason.
(I know I have already posted, but I don't agree with some of what
the
poster said.)
Response to Jame's Response of Rose's:
"While there are certain elements in the play portraying Medea as a
strong and intelligent heroine who was destined for tragedy due to
factors outside her control, there is more to it than just that.
Medea is not just a victim, as she partly brought all of this onto
herself."
Perhaps, however where in the play is it stated that Medea brought
any
of what happened on to herself?
"One must take into account the time when this play was written. It
was no secret back then that women had fewer rights than men, and
Medea should have been aware of that in the beginning."
What strikes me as slightly off here is that you're intending to say
that Medea should have been prepared for everything that happened,
however the final bit comes off as if you're assuming Medea was not
aware of her own time.
"Also, after carefully re-reading the story, it seems that Jason
never
really loved Medea, and in fact used her to his advantage."
I agree with part of this, however it seems now you're not giving
Jason a fair judgement. Jason is not evil, he didn't plan all of
this
in advance, he simply acted as a man of the time. What he did was an
attempt to gain favor and power,(I am not saying I agree with what he
did) something that fit the time quite well.
"Feeling guilty for what he had done, and against his better
judgment,
he brought Medea with him."
Umm...the flow of the story in your prior response to this one is a
bit out of sync. Medea went with Jason because she fell in love with
him, which was before the play begins.
"Again, who would truly feel comfortable with a woman who killed her
family for her fanatical "love" for a person? Her impulsive and
psychotic behavior when it came to her devotion for Jason should have
been enough of a warning sign. In a way, Medea herself was a
punishment from the gods to Jason."
I think you took thinking about the "time" a bit far. Medea's anger
for Jason came from disregarding their promise to be each others.
Before the play Jason was exiled from another kingdom, and in attempt
to better political ties and his own position he planned to marry a
princess. This can seem fine, you can say he had the entire family
in mind, his children, he wanted to raise them with a good name,
however
when he did this he angered not only Medea but also the Gods. It was
breaking their pact, their love, that Medea's actions are what
appears to be justified. (In Greek Mythology Jason is doomed by the
Gods
because of this, to die a lonely man, eventually crushed by Argo in
his sleep.)
What I'm trying to say is that you're mis-representing the real
conflict, Jason was troubled by Medea yes, however Medea's following
behaviour is exactly as can be expected, she gave up everything for a
man that in the end broke his promise.