Hi Steffen,
I would have expected these lower and upper bounds as well.
In most cases this is also true, but in some lumped reactions something goes wrong. I have two examples:
Ecample1:
Reaction1: NADP+[vc] + Isocitrate[vc] -> H+[vc] + NADPH[vc] + CO2[vc] + 2-Oxoglutarate[vc] lb= 0 ub= 1000
Reaction2: H2O[vc] + Acetyl-CoA[vc] + Oxaloacetate[vc] -> CoA[vc] + Citrate[vc] lb= 0 ub= 1000
Reaction3: Citrate[vc] <=> H2O[vc] + cis-Aconitate[vc] lb= -1000 ub= 1000
Reaction4: Isocitrate[vc] <=> H2O[vc] + cis-Aconitate[vc] lb= -1000 ub= 1000
R1+R2+R3+R4 lumped: NADP+[vc] + H2O[vc] + Acetyl-CoA[vc] + Oxaloacetate[vc] -> H+[vc] + NADPH[vc] + CO2[vc] + 2-Oxoglutarate[vc] + CoA[vc]
lb= 2.5614 ub= 1000
Example 2:
Reaction1: UDP-glucose[vc] + D-Fructose 6-phosphate[vc] -> UDP[vc] + Sucrose 6'-phosphate[vc] lb= 0 ub= 1000
Reaction2: H2O[vc] + Sucrose 6'-phosphate[vc] -> Pi[vc] + Sucrose[vc] lb= 0 ub=1000
R1+R2 lumped: 7.6555 UDP-glucose[vc] + 7.6555 D-Fructose 6-phosphate[vc] + 7.6555 H2O[vc] -> 7.6555 UDP[vc] + 7.6555 Pi[vc] + 7.6555 Sucrose[vc]
lb= 7.3363e-04 ub= 24.0668
Do the changed stoichiometric coefficients destroy the lower and upper bounds here?
I have no idea what's happening. But something goes wrong. Do you maybe have an explanation?
Best regards,
Marina