Fwd: For Reference, Record, & Action: Thursday, April 3, 2014: Scheme Options

[D S Kataria]

please r

ead this most interesting opinion of Mr.Anup S

ood

regards

kataria

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Anup Sood <anup...@gmail.com>
Date: 3 April 2014 14:22
Subject: For Reference, Record, & Action: Thursday, April 3, 2014: Scheme Options
To: Vippan Kapur <vippan...@ihcor.com>, Vir Singh <noo...@gmail.com>, Ranjan Narula <rna...@indiaiprights.com>, Manish Nagpal <manish...@anmindia.com>, D S Kataria <dska...@gmail.com>, Anju Malik <anjum...@gmail.com>, Ashok Bhaskar <ashokb...@gmail.com>, Rohitashwa Prasad <ricky_...@yahoo.com>
Cc: Kuldip Sindhu <kuldip_2...@yahoo.com>, Sp Singh <spsin...@gmail.com>, Padma Kumar <pad...@yahoo.co.in>, Anurag Sharma <ashar...@gmail.com>, Maharaj Ganju <brigganju....@gmail.com>

Dear All,

Pls find attached the Scheme Options along with a Cover note below, & attached Observations, Opinions, Dissent Notes etc.

Kindly revert with any further inputs, before tabling to the General Body of ALL Nirvana residents.

Thanks,

Anoop

98101931189810193118

On behalf of Review Committee

Cover Note: 

30-50% OF THE STRENGTH OF EACH BLOCK COLLEGIUM IS RESERVED FOR WOMEN, HENCE 90-150 WOMEN (based on a Maximum strength of 300 Collegium members) WILL BE AMONGST THE COLLEGIUM MEMBERS. THIS IS SUBJECT TO FULFILLMENT OF THE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

 

ANY SHORTFALL IN THIS NUMBER MAY BE FILLED BY ELIGIBLE PERMANENT MALE MEMBERS. 

Call

Send SMS

Add to Skype

You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype

[Ashish Agarwal]

I think cedar crest is being made to look like a "bechara"by a bunch of DW people who themselves were at loggerheads till a few days back and there was a suggestion for them to make their own RWA in view of their unresolved conflicts.
On top of this is the issue of clubbing DW EXTN which does not exist in first place.

I think we should strongly convey to this review committee:

1. By being a part of NRWA we are not looking for any special status or funds, as seems to be from a mail Mr Chawla wrote to Vippan Kapur, combining DW EXTN & CC, We will only seek our fair share from the corpus for CC betterment, whatever can be achieved from such share.

2. Advocate DW EXTN clubbing with DW itself for reasons discussed earlier in the dissent note forwarded by Deepak to the review committee.

I also suggest we meet with the review committee ASAP to emphasise these issues.
The fight with Unitech is a long drawn battle, whose issues could be avoided at this stage for our proper representation into the RWA first.

Inputs please.

Thank you.

Ashish Agarwal

[raj...@gaartexx.com]

the whole group is so confused amongst themselves...

1. At one stage, they convey that CC is not part of RWA, as the bye laws (so submitted) have not been approved by Registrar.

2. If thats the case, then CLOSE should be part of NRWA. Which conveniently they have decided to cede with..

3. Unitech has never sold a block with a name as DW extension.

4. DW exten still has a access thru the DW, so it should be part of DW itself.

5. There could be a few common issues between CC & DW(EXT), but that does not mean that we are siamese twins.

Even if NRWA decides to give a preferential status to CC + DW (extn)  - (I'm very sure that same set of DW will not agree to this extra funds doled to CC / DWE) - these funds should be allocated based on number of paying members from each block. We as CC residents had worked hard to get our fellow neighbors become member & pay NRWA charges, where as from DWE - there are only 2 paying members.

Best Regards,

Rajesh Kinra

Gartex Overseas Limited

(India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka)
raj...@gaartexx.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cedar Crest" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cedar-crest...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.