FW: Retrospective payment of NRWA subscriptions - no EC can grant reprieve

4 views
Skip to first unread message

MANISH NAGPAL

unread,
Apr 11, 2014, 8:36:49 AM4/11/14
to <cedar-crest@googlegroups.com>, raj...@gaartexx.com
Dear All

Please see the mail below

Dear Rajesh

I agree with your opinion I need your view to represent to the Adhoc
committee, I have also made my reasons for not paying the subscription now.



Thanks

Regards
FOR ANM AND ASSOCIATES
Partner
Address : 2nd Floor SCO 11 12 Sector 15 Part II
Gurgaon-122001
Tel No. 0124-4270450 4270451,4270452
Mobile No 09811213396
Www.anmindia.com






On 11/04/14 5:19 PM, "kuldip_2...@yahoo.com"
<kuldip_2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Brig Ganju,
>
> This is a no brainer - am afraid in any Society the rule of law &
>equality in opportunity & responsibility prevails for all.
>
> Surely non-paying residents cannot 'smooch' or enjoy the facilities
>provided by Nirvana on money of those who have paid subscriptions. This
>is one law that has to be enforced strictly, and backlog of dues cannot
>be condoned. We also invite the attention of all such residents to the
>Annexures of the "Buyers Agreement" signed by all owners when bookin the
>plots/villas - answer will be clear to them.
>
> As Vippan has stated, we have to jointly share the burden in creating a
>"Sinking Fund" - money for this will not fall from heaven - all of us
>have to contribute.
>
> Payment is mandatory under the HRRS Act, and it is immaterial whether
>an elected or an illegal EC has passed the instruction. The payment is
>nonetheless legal, and has been made by many residents without quibbling.
>
> Do advise the nay sayers /non payers to cooperate and be part of the
>society and not against. Subscription is only for their long term benefit.
>
>Regards.
>
>Maj Gen (Retd) KS Sindhu, vsm
>Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Vippan Kapur <vippan...@ihcor.com>
>Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:59:35
>To: Maharaj Ganju<brigganju....@gmail.com>
>Cc: Rajan Narula<rna...@indiaiprights.com>; Vir
>Singh<noo...@gmail.com>; Manish Nagpal<manish...@anmindia.com>; D S
>Kataria<dska...@gmail.com>; Anju Malik<anjum...@gmail.com>; Ashok
>Bhaskar<ashokb...@gmail.com>; Rohitashwa
>Prasad<ricky_...@yahoo.com>; Padma Kumar<pad...@yahoo.co.in>; Kuldip
>Sindhu<kuldip_2...@yahoo.com>; Nirvana Residents
>Group<nirvanar...@googlegroups.com>
>Subject: Re: Communication of complaint/suggestion from residents to the
>Adhoc EC
>
>Dear Brig Ganju , All,
>
>i ( and there are 271 other residents) have paid my dues every year ,
>legality / illegality notwithstanding .
>
>Fact is, that successive EC¹s have been lax with this matter , and even
>gone the extra mile by having an office bearer who is in default , has
>not paid his dues .
>
>i see absolutely no justification for accommodating defaulters , and you
>may like to enlighten these residents that payment of subscription is a
>requirement under the HRRS Act 2012 .
>
>In addition to the above , the potential low participation should be
>reason enough for them to make good their dues .
>
>Surely we do not live in a LIG colony where paying dues is going to cause
>a severe financial strain on the residents ?
>
>Thank you,
>
>Regards,
>
>Vippan
>On 11-Apr-2014, at 4:04 pm, Maharaj Ganju
><brigganju....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>> Two ladies from DW 231 and 255 visited the RWA office
>>today and suggested that the criteria of having paid the NRWA
>>subscription update for illegibility for voting in the elections should
>>not be stressed ,rather the cut off date should be changed.The
>>justification to this suggestion given by them on behalf of a large
>>chunk of DW residents are:
>> 1.Since only 271 residents are update in RWA subscription and not many
>>people have responded to our circular of paying the subscriptions;the
>>participation in the ensuing elections is going to be meagre and the
>>resultant collegiums/EC will not be the true representation of the
>>entire Nirvana.
>> 2.The decision to restart the subscriptions for 2013-14 was made by the
>>earstwhile EC which was not legally elected,therefore defunct,and hence
>>dissolved.
>> They have suggested that the cut off date should be before 12 May
>>2013,when the legally elected EC was in place.
>> FYI Pl.
>> Rgds.
>


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages